New York Personal Injury Lawyers

Truck Accidents in New York: Statistical Analysis & Legal Implications

By Dansker & Aspromonte

Related Posts

August 22, 2024

Successful NYC Truck Accident Cases

Categories

Truck-Accidents-in-New-York

In 2021, there were over half a million large truck accidents across the United States, representing a 26% increase in large truck accidents from 2020 to 2021.1 Thankfully, a majority of these accidents do not result in fatalities or injuries. In 2020, 4,444 commercial trucking collisions—or roughly 1% of large truck accidents—resulted in fatalities.2

New York is not immune from the danger of trucking accidents. The American economy is logistically dependent on the trucking industry, but this does not mean truck drivers and trucking companies are entitled to behave however they choose. Negligence on the part of truck drivers and trucking companies causes enormous economic loss in the United States each year. Even worse, commercial trucking accidents cause devastating injuries and deaths.

If you or a loved one has been injured in a commercial trucking accident, call the attorneys at Dansker & Aspromonte Associates. Our attorneys have significant experience litigating commercial trucking accidents. We are available to consult with you about your legal rights and options in the wake of a devastating trucking accident.

The Unique Challenges of Truck Accidents in NYC

The Impact of Weather, Road Conditions & Local Infrastructure on NYC Truck Accidents

Weather, road conditions, and local infrastructure all play a role in determining the frequency of commercial trucking accidents. Weather conditions such as high wind speeds can impact vehicle performance metrics such as stability. The Federal Highway Administration (“FHA”) collected statistics on the impact of weather events on the frequency of automotive collisions from 2007 to 2016. The FHA’s data showed that there are an average of 1,235,145 crashes every year, and approximately 21% of those crashes—nearly 259,000—occur either in adverse weather such as rain, sleet, snow, fog, severe crosswinds, or blowing snow, sand, or debris, or on slick pavement.3 Despite their size and enormous power, commercial vehicles are not immune to these conditions.

Road conditions account for the vast majority of weather-related accidents. Seventy percent of these crashes occur on wet pavement. Surprisingly, winter conditions account for a much smaller percentage of weather-related crashes: only 18% of crashes occur during snow or sleet, 13% occur on icy pavement, and just 16% take place on snowy or slushy pavement.4

Surprising Statistics: Rural Trucking Accidents Are More Common Than Urban Collisions

Despite the risks seemingly posed by dense urban environments, fatal truck accident injuries are less common in NYC than in rural areas. Significantly larger proportions of trucking accidents involving commercial trucks, 18-wheelers, or big rigs occur on high-speed roads in rural areas. Twenty percent of people in the U.S. live in rural areas, yet in 2022 almost 54% of all fatal truck accidents occurred in rural areas, compared to the roughly 46% of fatal truck crashes that occurred in urban environments.5

These statistics are partly attributable to the fact that commercial vehicles tend to move at much higher speeds in rural areas than in urban areas for two reasons. First, commercial trucks, semi-trucks, 18-wheelers, and other big rigs operating in rural areas are more frequently driving on roads with higher speed limits. Second, the operators of these commercial vehicles are more likely to drive faster than the speed limits on the less congested roads typical of rural areas.

However, speed is not the only factor at play here. The roads in rural areas often present significantly different conditions than their urban counterparts. Rural roads are often much darker than urban ones, increasing the risk of a collision due to enhanced driver fatigue. The layout of the land also increases the risk of a trucking accident in rural areas. Urban roads are often designed in a predictable grid, but rural roads are often laid out in more complicated ways.

The Economic Cost of Truck Accidents

Commercial trucking is big business in America: American truckers carried 10.23 billion tons of freight and generated $732.3 billion in revenue in 2020.6 These trucks are responsible for carrying 72.5% of the nation’s cargo, and there are more of them on America’s highways than ever before. With that increase in trucks has come an increase in both the frequency of truck accidents and fatalities in those accidents.

Trucking accidents cause enormous economic losses. Quantifying the economic costs of trucking accidents is an uncomfortable endeavor, especially those in which a human being is injured or killed, but these costs are too large to ignore. Safe trucking policies, procedures, and practices are not just intended to keep people safe; they function to protect the American economy.

According to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (the “FMCSA”), the average cost of a commercial truck accident in which one person is injured is $148,279. A fatal trucking accident is even more expensive: the FMCSA reports that the average total cost associated with a fatal trucking accident is $7.2 million.7 These numbers do not account for the legal liability faced by truck drivers and their employers in the aftermath.

Commercial trucking accidents impose both visible and invisible costs. The visible costs include the damage to the truck itself, damage to the truck’s cargo, injury costs from the accident, medical costs associated with the accident, administrative fees, increased insurance premiums for the trucking company, the cost of tow trucks, and the costs of storing the damaged vehicles.

However, the hidden costs associated with trucking accidents are often even more expensive. These costs include the salaries paid to employees involved in a truck accident, the trucking company’s loss of clients, the employee’s lost time at work due to the accident, the unavailability of the damaged trucking equipment, workers’ compensation premiums that must be paid, hiring replacement drivers, and paying any fees or fines owed to the government. The broader economic disruption caused by trucking accidents may be impossible to calculate.

The Scope of Truck Accidents in NYC

NYC Truck Accident Statistics by Borough

It is difficult to precisely measure the impact of dense urban environments on truck accidents, but the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) keeps updated records of all motor vehicle collisions in New York City. As of June 2024, there were 599 motor vehicle collisions involving large commercial vehicles (defined as vehicles with 6 or more tires) in New York City and another 80 collisions involving smaller commercial vehicles (defined as vehicles with 4 tires).8

Brooklyn—which had 219 collisions involving large commercial vehicles and another 37 collisions involving small commercial vehicles—had the greatest number of these collisions. Staten Island had the fewest such collisions, with only 15 large commercial vehicle collisions and just 2 small commercial vehicle collisions. Queens, Manhattan, and the Bronx fall between these two poles, with 141, 132, and 92 large commercial vehicle collisions, respectively, and another 17, 12, and 12 small commercial vehicle collisions, respectively.9

New York is Among the Safest States in the Nation

As previously stated, there were 4,444 fatal accidents involving large trucks such as semi-trucks, big rigs, or eighteen-wheelers in 2020. In that year, there were 108 fatal trucking accidents in New York. That number is unacceptably high, but New York is one of the safest states when the number is put into its full context.10

Per capita, New York had the third fewest fatal trucking accidents of any state, with just 5.52 trucking fatalities per one million people in 2020. The five states with the highest number of fatal trucking accidents per capita—specifically Nebraska, Mississippi, South Dakota, Alabama, and Wyoming—had an average of 28.44 fatalities caused by trucking accidents per million people.11

Unfortunately, these numbers have increased in New York. In 2022, there were 143 fatalities in large truck accidents in New York. These accounted for 2% of all trucking fatalities in the United States in 2022.12

Causes of Truck Accidents in NYC

In July 2007, the FMCSA released a study examining the reasons why accidents involving large trucks happen. That study, which selected a nationally representative sample, ultimately found a statistically significant link between ten associated factors and crashes of both ordinary automobiles and trucks. Those factors are:

  1. Interruptions in the flow of traffic;
  2. A driver’s lack of familiarity with a roadway;
  3. Inadequate surveillance of the road;
  4. Driving faster than is appropriate for a given set of conditions;
  5. Drivers performing illegal maneuvers;
  6. Inattentive driving;
  7. Driver fatigue;
  8. Drivers who are sick;
  9. Drivers wrongly assuming what other drivers will do on the road; and
  10. Driving while distracted by an object or another person in the vehicle.13

This study notes that these factors are not exhaustive. This is especially true in examining trucking accidents, as there was a statistically significant link between trucking accidents and issues with the truck’s brakes and tires, jackknifing, and cargo shift.14

Ultimately, the most common cause of trucking accidents is driver error. The term “driver error” encompasses the following:

  • Nonperformance: Nonperformance in this context means things like the driver falling asleep, being disabled by a medical issue such as a heart attack or seizure, or being physically impaired for some other reason.
  • Recognition: A driver errs in recognition by being inattentive, getting distracted by something inside or outside of the truck, or failing to adequately observe the situation in front of them for some other reason.
  • Decision: Driver errors also include the decisions that a driver consciously makes, such as the decision to drive too fast or follow other vehicles too closely.
  • Performance: This component of driver error recognizes that the driver attempted to perform their duties but failed due to panicking, overcompensating, or exercising poor control over the vehicle.15

It makes sense that inadequate training of a commercial vehicle’s driver is a prominent cause of trucking accidents given that driver error is the most common cause of trucking accidents. Trucking companies must be proactive in ensuring their drivers are properly certified and able to handle the tasks at hand.

In the same vein, trucking companies need to perform proper substance abuse screening at the time they hire the trucker and continue these screenings throughout their employment. Substance abuse runs rampant in the trucking industry and is a major cause of commercial trucking collisions.

Equipment failure is another broad category that can cause a trucking accident. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s Fatal Causation study found that 55% of truck accident injuries involved a truck with at least one mechanical failure, and 30% of trucks have at least one out-of-service equipment issue. Common equipment failures include:

  • Faulty or poorly maintained brakes;
  • Improperly inflated or worn tires;
  • Defective or missing safety equipment such as underride rails;
  • Improperly functioning or defective lights or turn signals;
  • Generally poor vehicle maintenance;
  • Unbalanced cargo;
  • Transmission failure; and
  • Defectively manufactured parts.16

Finally, it is the priorities of the trucking companies themselves that often cause trucking accidents. The sad truth is that companies often prioritize meeting client delivery deadlines above all else, leading to unrealistic schedules for their drivers, improper loading of the trucks, and driver fatigue. This, in turn, results in an increased likelihood of an accident. Tragically, many of the crashes caused by the poor practices implemented by the company in pursuit of client satisfaction could be prevented if only the company would prioritize the safety of its drivers and other motorists.17

Legal Implications of Truck Accidents in NYC

People who are injured in trucking accidents, and their families, may be entitled to compensation under the law if they can prove that the truck driver or the trucking company was negligent. Evidence of violations of federal or New York state regulations by the truck driver or company goes a long way toward proving the trucking company’s negligence. More specifically, a skilled NYC truck accident lawyer can use their knowledge of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (the “FMCSRs”) and New York state regulations to identify a legal obligation set forth by those regulations, determine if the defendant truck driver or trucking company met that obligation, and, if they did not, determine whether that failure was the cause of their client’s injury.18

Under the FMCSRs, trucking companies—known as carriers—are required to establish financial responsibility for a minimum of $750,000 in either insurance policies, bonds, or self-insurance. This requirement that the trucking company maintain an insurance policy worth at least $750,000 serves two purposes. First, it ensures that parties who are injured in a trucking accident are able to seek compensation for those injuries from the company that caused them. Second, requiring the companies to obtain insurance is an indirect way of encouraging them to maintain safe practices and procedures through the insurance company’s monitoring of its insured. The idea is that insurance companies will charge higher premiums or refuse to issue a policy to companies engaged in unsafe practices, thereby incentivizing safe practices.19

Given the gravity of the harm that befalls truck accident plaintiffs, it should come as no surprise that there are numerous types of damages available to people injured in trucking accidents under New York law. New York recognizes that plaintiffs are entitled to damages to replace what they lost due to the truck accident injury. These will generally include expenses for medical bills and other financial issues necessitated by the injury. In rare cases, the plaintiff may receive punitive damages where the truck driver’s or trucking company’s actions were egregious.20

Conclusion

As has been demonstrated, trucking accidents have many contributing factors, including road conditions, weather, driver errors, faulty equipment, and bad procedures on the part of the trucking companies. When disaster strikes, trucking accidents can cause millions of dollars in quantifiable economic damages. All too often, these trucking accidents permanently alter human lives for the worse or end them altogether. Effective trucking accident litigation is crucial in helping to prevent the social and physical harms caused by negligent trucking practices.

Call our attorneys at Dansker & Aspromonte Associates if you have been injured in a trucking accident. Our attorneys understand the difficulties you and your family are facing during this time and will walk with you every step of the way. We understand that, at the end of the day, your case is critical to getting your life and the lives of your family members back on track after suffering a horrific injury.

Whether you’re dealing with injuries from a car accident, construction accidents, or a wrongful death case, our attorneys are here to provide compassionate support.

 

  1. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, “Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts,” 2021.
  2. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, “Fatality Analysis Reporting System,” 2020.
  3. Federal Highway Administration, “Weather Impacts on Safety,” 2019.
  4. Id.
  5. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, “Fatality Analysis Reporting System,” 2022.
  6. American Trucking Associations, “Trucking Industry Revenues,” 2020.
  7. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, “The Economic Cost of Large Truck Crashes,” 2021.
  8. New York City Police Department, “Traffic Collision Statistics,” 2024.
  9. Id.
  10. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, “Fatality Analysis Reporting System,” 2020.
  11. Id.
  12. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, “Fatality Analysis Reporting System,” 2022.
  13. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, “Large Truck Crash Causation Study,” 2007.
  14. Id.
  15. Id.
  16. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, “Fatal Causation Study,” 2021.
  17. Id.
  18. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, “Large Truck Crash Causation Study,” 2007.
  19. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, “Financial Responsibility Requirements,” 2021.
  20. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, “Compensation for Injuries,” 2024.

 

Recover Your Life

Let Us Fight For You
Free & Confidential Consultation

By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request.

Unfortunately, based on your query, we are unable to assist you at this time. Our firm specializes in serious accidents and negligence cases, such as car accidents, slips and falls, construction accidents, and other accidents that require hospitalization or ongoing treatment.

Proven Record of Success

Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP has been advocating for the rights of the injured since 1986. We have the tools, resources, knowledge, and commitment to get you the best possible outcome.

Providing Answers & Solutions

Our team is committed to always being able to provide you with updates on your case and answers to your questions. This is your case and we want to be sure you are confident every step of the way.

Small Firm Dedication & Focus

Our firm is different from most firms in our area in that we are a “boutique” type firm that is small enough to give personal attention to our clients and yet experienced and powerful with a reputation as a hard-hitting litigation firm.

Innovative Legal Strategies

Each client that comes to our team gets a managing partner and trial partner dedicated to their case. We put our collective 100 years of experience behind your case to obtain the best possible outcome on your behalf.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, lo que lo dejó en coma y con graves lesiones cerebrales.
Esta contable caminaba después del trabajo en Battery Park en el paseo peatonal cuando de repente fue golpeada por una motoneta de la policía que iba a gran velocidad.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
La Sra. Y-H, pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un niño sufrió lesiones graves después de caerse mientras corría detrás de su autobús escolar y ser atropellado por las ruedas traseras. Este caso demuestra la habilidad de la firma para obtener compensación en accidentes que involucran autobuses escolares y menores.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
La Sra. Y-H era una pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, sufriendo lesiones graves, incluyendo un coma. Aunque es un caso de peatón, el incidente involucra un vehículo y demuestra la experiencia de la firma en manejar accidentes graves de tránsito.
A pesar del hecho de que este caso fue referido a Dansker & Aspromonte LLP Associates por otro abogado 17 años después de que ocurriera el accidente, se obtuvo un veredicto impresionante a través de una investigación cuidadosa y una preparación incansable.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este caso involucró a una niña de 6 años que estaba en una camioneta que fue golpeada por una ambulancia en un choque de varios autos en el Northern State Parkway en Long Island, Nueva York.
Una oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años sufrió lesiones graves mientras era pasajera en un automóvil policial en camino a una llamada de emergencia.
Un carpintero de 46 años cayó de una escalera que resbaló en el sitio de trabajo, lo que le causó lesiones significativas. Este caso ilustra la experiencia de la firma en accidentes de equipo defectuoso en entornos de construcción.
Un carpintero de 30 años cayó de una escalera en un sitio de trabajo en una tienda minorista, resultando en lesiones graves. Este caso subraya la capacidad de la firma para asegurar compensación en accidentes de caídas en proyectos de construcción.
Un inmigrante mexicano sin documentación cayó 30 pies desde un andamio en un sitio de construcción, sufriendo lesiones graves al impactar contra el cemento. Este caso demuestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas en el lugar de trabajo, comunes en la construcción.
Un trabajador de construcción sufrió fracturas en el hombro, clavícula, costillas y cadera, además de lesiones internas que requirieron múltiples cirugías. Este caso destaca la habilidad de la firma para manejar lesiones graves en el lugar de trabajo.
Baby S was born with a congenital hip dislocation which was not anyone’s fault. However, malpractice occurred when the doctors and hospital did not recognize the condition after she was born. Their failure to diagnose and properly treat the condition resulted in a slight but permanent deformity.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.
A 46-year-old carpenter was working on a straight ladder which had been leaned against the wall on a jobsite. He fell when the ladder slipped away from the wall. As a result, he suffered facial injuries and a fractured knee that required surgery. The property owner and general contractor were found to be responsible because Jian S. should have been provided with a more suitable A-frame ladder or scaffolding.
A 30-year-old carpenter who was working at a job site in a retail store fell from a ladder onto both feet. He suffered bilateral calcaneus fractures requiring multiple surgeries.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Maria, a housekeeper, was walking across Ocean Parkway in Brooklyn in the crosswalk when she was struck by a school bus and thrown over 25 feet. She sustained severe injuries, including multiple fractures. The bus driver claimed that he had a green light and was travelling at a safe speed. Unfortunately, Mrs. S. could not recall any of the facts of the accident. Our investigator combed the area for witnesses. He found a woman who lived on the sixth floor of an adjacent apartment building. Although she didn’t see the accident, she happened to look out her window and saw Maria’s body lying in the roadway down the street. Using this testimony, our accident reconstruction expert was able to prove that the bus had to be speeding to knock Maria that far from the crosswalk. The case was settled immediately after that testimony.
Our client was a married NYC Parks Department employee. On a snowy night in Staten Island, he was preparing his truck to spread salt on the roadways. He drove the spreader truck to the salt storage yard. As he waited alongside his truck, the operator of a front loader truck used to place the salt in the spreader lost control of the loading bucket. Sadly, he was struck by the bucket, suffered massive injuries and died in the hospital several hours later.
A 21-year-old developmentally disabled Chinese boy was walking with some friends after school when he stepped out into the crosswalk against the light and a City bus which was turning a little too close to the corner struck him. The young man had crippling injuries which prevented him from leaving the hospital where he died several months later. Despite the fact that eyewitnesses said the boy stepped into the street against the light, the law reduces an injured person’s share of liability in accordance with their mental capacity. At trial, it was proven through a guidance counselor from his school that he was intellectually comparable to a seven-year-old. Thereafter, the jury determined that this young man was not legally responsible for his actions and awarded 100% in his favor on the liability portion of the trial
In one of the most tragic cases this office has seen, two mothers and their four teenagers were driving to a high school swimming meet on the New York State Thruway in a van. When the driver suspected a flat tire, instead of pulling over onto the shoulder, the mother of two of the children inexplicably stopped the van in the right moving lane of traffic. Within a very short time, the driver of a tanker truck traveling at a steady 65 miles an hour who claimed not to see the stopped van, struck it at full speed, literally cutting the van in half. There were two survivors with grave injuries and four fatalities. We secured the maximum insurance that was available to cover these claims.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Un trabajador de construcción de 50 años estaba montando su bicicleta cuando cayó debido a un defecto en la carretera y sufrió pequeñas fracturas y daños cognitivos leves.
Un trabajador de mantenimiento de 31 años golpeó un sensor de presión de control de tráfico de la ciudad de Nueva York mientras montaba su bicicleta. Debido a un mal mantenimiento del sensor, el trabajador sufrió lesiones graves.
Una mujer y su novio estaban andando en bicicleta cuando entraron en un sitio de excavación sin protección en una zona completamente oscura bajo un paso elevado. La bicicleta de Rhonda cayó en un pozo y su cara se estrelló contra la carretera.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
La madre de Taylor había subido más de 50 libras durante el embarazo, estaba atrasada, y tuvo una prolongada primera y segunda etapa del parto.
Una joven madre china por primera vez resultó herida debido a la negligencia médica de los médicos y el personal de lo que entonces era el Hospital Beekman Downtown.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un guardia de seguridad resbaló en una superficie helada frente a un edificio propiedad de Metropolitan Life, lo que le causó una fractura de rodilla.
Una asistente de salud en el hogar de 56 años tropezó con un cable expuesto que se extendía desde una cabina telefónica en la plataforma del metro, resultando en una lesión que requirió un reemplazo de rodilla.
Un conductor de servicio se bajó de su vehículo para recoger dinero en el carril de un Burger King cuando cayó a través de una rejilla de alcantarillado rota, resultando en una caída de 4 pies y lesiones significativas.
Un trabajador de construcción indocumentado cayó desde un andamio a 30 pies de altura, impactando contra el cemento y sufriendo lesiones graves. Este caso muestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas graves en el trabajo, que se relacionan con incidentes de resbalones y caídas en entornos peligrosos.
Un niño de 16 años fue atropellado por un camión que estaba retrocediendo lentamente y quedó atrapado contra una pared, sufriendo una grave laceración en el bazo, que tuvo que ser removido.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
Adjudicado a la familia. Un hombre de 49 años cayó por el hueco de un ascensor cuando las puertas del ascensor se abrieron, pero la cabina del ascensor estaba en un piso superior.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este accidente ocurrió en el Bronx cuando Rafael C. estaba trabajando en un camión de saneamiento. El conductor perdió el control al girar el vehículo.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Un Oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años era una pasajera en un automóvil de la policía que iba a una llamada de emergencia.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.