New York Personal Injury Lawyers

The High Cost of Slip and Fall Accidents in NYC

By Dansker & Aspromonte

Related Posts

January 16, 2025

Legal Rights and Remedies in Slip, Trip & Fall Cases

Snowy-NYC-Sidewalk

Annually, the City of New York spends substantial amounts to settle personal injury claims, including slip-and-fall cases. In Fiscal Year 2023, the city paid out approximately $739.6 million in tort claims, which encompass personal injury and property damage claims (New York City Comptroller’s Office).

Slip-and-fall incidents contribute significantly to these expenditures. For example, sidewalk-related personal injury claims frequently result in costly settlements, with the city allocating millions annually to resolve such cases. In Fiscal Year 2023, the city resolved 13,741 claims and lawsuits, reflecting the significant caseload these incidents impose on the judicial system (New York City Comptroller’s Office).

Settlements for similar injuries on private property can also be substantial. In New York, slip-and-fall claims often result in sizable compensation depending on the severity of injuries and circumstances, as outlined in general premises liability guidance

Beyond direct financial costs, NYC taxpayers bear additional burdens, including expenses for emergency response and medical treatment through public hospitals and Medicaid reimbursements. Medicaid often asserts liens on personal injury settlements to recover costs of care provided to injured individuals (Medicaid.gov).

Addressing the prevalence of slip-and-fall incidents is crucial to alleviating financial and systemic pressures on New York City.

Scope of the Problem

This article examines the scope of the slip-and-fall injury problem in NYC from a broad perspective. Some key points to consider include:

  • Informational Context: Understanding the causes of slip-and-fall injuries and why they are particularly problematic in NYC.
  • Instructional Guidance: Highlighting possible preventative measures to reduce such incidents.
  • Comparative Insight: Examining the legal implications of premises liability injuries, such as slip-and-falls.

Understanding the Basic Components of a Slip-and-Fall Accident

Generally, a slip-and-fall injury is not truly an “accident.” As outlined below, property owner negligence, which is essentially a lack of care, is usually the cause of these incidents. If a public or private property owner negligently maintains their property, injury victims may be entitled to substantial compensation in court (FindLaw).

Specifically, hazardous property conditions are typically responsible for slip-and-fall injuries. Common hazardous conditions include uneven walkways, slippery surfaces, poorly-lit walkways, and obstructed pathways (Justia).

These incidents often result in catastrophic (life-threatening) injuries, particularly if the victim is physically vulnerable, such as an individual with advanced age or a pre-existing medical condition. Such injuries may lead to costly medical bills and long-term recovery (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)).

Special Slip-and-Fall Issues in NYC

In many parts of the country, slip-and-fall incidents, especially those occurring outdoors, are not a significant concern. However, New York City presents unique challenges that exacerbate these incidents.

  • Excessive Foot Traffic: New York City attracts over 62 million visitors annually. These individuals navigate crowded sidewalks and frequently move in and out of unfamiliar buildings. The sheer number of pedestrians also makes it difficult for employees to spot property hazards, which may lead to increased incidents (NYC & Company).
  • Severe Weather: NYC experiences high winds, freezing temperatures, and considerable precipitation for about six months each year. In fact, New York City saw its first measurable snow of the 2024 season in December, and such weather conditions can make outdoor walkways hazardous (New York Post).

Compounding these issues, the NYC Department of Buildings notes that many private and commercial structures lack the latest pedestrian safety measures. In addition, safety features that were once effective may have become worn down or degraded over time, further increasing the risk of accidents (NYC Department of Buildings).

Legal Framework of Slip-and-Fall Claims

The legal principle of negligence is grounded in the moral principle of the Good Samaritan, who went out of his way to assist an injured traveler. Similarly, property owners must take proactive steps to prevent injuries on their premises.

Duty of Care

Under both state and city laws, individual public and private property owners must properly maintain outdoor walkways, such as sidewalks, directly adjacent to their buildings so they are safe for all users.  Historically, the level of responsibility varied depending on the relationship between the injury victim and the property owner.  Today, the legal duty to maintain your property in a reasonably safe condition applies regardless of your relationship to the owner.

Knowledge of Hazard

Property owners are legally responsible for slip-and-fall damages if they knew, or should have known, about the injury-causing hazard.

Maintenance reports that point out injury hazards, prior complaints about such hazards, and prior injuries usually establish actual knowledge. These cases merit special attention among owners because compensation is typically higher in these cases. Quite simply, owners who ignore such warning signs may appear callous, and jurors tend to view them unfavorably (FindLaw).

Sometimes, the “time-notice rule” establishes constructive knowledge (should have known). For instance, imagine a banana peel on the floor. If the peel is yellow, it most likely just fell, so the owner may not be liable for damages. However, liability likely attaches if the peel is brown or black, indicating it has been there for some time (Justia).

Additionally, owners have a duty to put two and two together. Assume that ABC’s owner knows about a depression on a sidewalk where water collects. If the weather forecast calls for freezing rain, ABC could be legally responsible for a slip on that ice patch, even though no employee actually saw the ice (Legal Information Institute).

How Slip-and-Fall Injuries Affect Public Resources

The recent COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fragile nature of New York City’s public health and safety infrastructure. Additionally, slip-and-fall injuries are a consistent issue among NYC’s elderly population. Almost half of nursing home residents experience fall-related injuries each year. Given the city’s growing elderly population and the strain this places on resources, this statistic is nothing short of alarming.

Incidents and Public Safety Impacts

A slip-and-fall 9-1-1 call usually prompts an “all hands on deck” response. Within moments of that call, multiple law enforcement personnel and other first responders arrive to secure the scene and assist injured victims.

The responding agency may ultimately be reimbursed for that expense. For example, negligent property owners are typically responsible for all injury-related medical bills, including transportation expenses. However, this reimbursement, if available, does not change the fact that these responders were unable to assist other people in need at the time of the incident (Justia).

Crumbling infrastructure and winter weather contribute not only to the risk and severity of slip-and-fall injuries but also extend response times, increasing the opportunity cost of emergency responses. Simple precautions, such as timely snow and ice removal, salting surfaces, and displaying adequate warning signage, significantly reduce these risks and costs (OSHA – Snow Removal).

Injuries and Public Health Problems

Slip-and-fall injuries directly contribute to public health problems in NYC, mostly due to the strain these injuries place on the public health system:

  • Broken Bones: Typically, slip-and-fall-related broken bones do not fully heal. As a result, less active and less mobile victims are at greater risk for a subsequent fall. Subsequent fall victims almost always require time in a long-term care facility, and a significant number of these individuals cannot subsequently live independently. This increased care requirement places significant strain on healthcare resources (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
  • Brain Injuries: Similar to broken bones, brain injuries are permanent, as dead brain cells do not regenerate. As a result, brain injury victims often need ongoing medical care, placing an additional burden on an already strained healthcare system.
  • Emotional Injuries: Many fall victims become so afraid of falling again that they essentially withdraw from society. This inactivity not only increases the risk of future falls but also leads to depression and other mental health issues that the healthcare system, as well as family members, struggle to manage (National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)).

Property owners should not breathe a sigh of relief if injury victims do not immediately seek medical treatment. Adrenaline frequently masks pain, and many victims do not “feel” hurt, but they may still be seriously injured. Timely medical attention is crucial to preventing long-term complications (CDC – Injury Prevention).   Even if the injury victim receives medical care long after an injury, a medical doctor can relate the treatment to the incident.

All New York City property owners ultimately share these costs, through higher taxes and insurance premiums.

Consequences of Slip-and-Fall Claims to the Legal System

When an excess number of slip-and-fall claims go to court, everyone suffers. These cases are time-consuming, and litigants in these cases, as well as those in other cases, experience additional frustrating delays. Furthermore, these claims usually involve multiple parties—victims, property owners, and insurance companies—which adds complexity and drives up the costs of legal matters (FindLaw).

On the plus side, court verdicts often have a deterrent effect, as these matters are public record and the results are broadcast to the public. However, this deterrent effect often does not make up for the lost time and money that accompany slip-and-fall claims.

Prevention Strategies for Slip-and-Fall Injuries in Public Spaces

Regular property inspections, especially during busy tourist seasons, may be the best way to prevent outdoor slip-and-falls. Designating an employee to perform such inspections and follow up as necessary can be an additional cost. However, this cost is lower than the cost of a liability judgment. As risk management expert Annabel Lewis points out, “A sound maintenance program for sidewalks and entrances, coupled with real-time weather monitoring, can reduce slip and fall claims by up to 50 percent in urban centers.”

Prompt maintenance is essential as well. Do not delay repairs and upkeep, such as plugging leaks and changing burned-out lightbulbs. Such maintenance is particularly necessary in places like nursing homes, which tend to have a high number of elderly visitors. In fact, slip-and-fall injuries in nursing homes often result in serious long-term consequences for elderly residents (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)).

Liberal use of warning signs can also help. As mentioned earlier, merely warning an invitee does not satisfy the full duty of care. However, a well-placed warning sign makes the assumption of risk—a key legal defense in slip-and-fall claims—much easier to prove.

Briefly, assumption of risk often drastically reduces the amount of a liability judgment. The defendant must prove that the victim saw the sign, could read it, and understood its meaning. This defense can be a key factor in reducing liability in such cases (Justia).

Property owners should also take proactive measures to prevent slip-and-fall injuries. Upgrade exterior lighting, especially in areas like parking lots and stairwells. Additionally, property owners should prepare for winter weather by stocking up on shovels, salt, de-icing chemicals, and other such tools (OSHA – Snow Removal).

Solutions in Action: Winter Weather and Slip-and-Fall Risks in NYC

The winter of 2021-22 was particularly harsh in New York City. Several large, dangerous snowstorms hit the area hard. Complaints of snowdrifts on sidewalks increased significantly, and slip-and-fall injury claims rose accordingly.

New Yorkers responded to the challenge. Several community organizations conducted aggressive public awareness campaigns to warn people of the danger. Additionally, some groups provided resources for property owners, such as free salt distribution. Snowdrift complaints and slip-and-fall injury claims dropped noticeably in these areas (The New York Times).

Other northern cities faced similar challenges during that winter. Their solutions offer valuable lessons for NYC stakeholders:

  • Chicago: Chicago businesses face heavy fines if they fail to properly maintain sidewalks, specifically failing to timely remove snow and ice. Additionally, the city aggressively enforces these ordinances (Chicago Tribune).
  • Boston: Boston officials have focused on infrastructure upgrades. Citywide sidewalk repair projects have significantly reduced the number of slip-and-fall hazards, mostly uneven walkways and potholes.

The takeaway is clear: NYC’s slip-and-fall problem is indeed daunting. But this problem is not unsolvable and is not unique. If other municipalities have successfully reduced these dangers, NYC can do so as well.

Key Slip-and-Fall Prevention Stakeholders in NYC

Property managers and owners have a legal and moral responsibility to ensure that sidewalks and other walkways are safe and passable. They also have a legal and moral obligation to properly address any dangerous conditions in these areas (FindLaw).

Municipal agencies also play a crucial role. The NYC Department of Transportation (DOT) sets and enforces sidewalk safety standards and snow/ice removal deadlines. This authority also oversees public spaces, such as subway entries and exits, and is responsible for citing property owners who violate these standards and regulations (NYC DOT).

Despite the best efforts of these stakeholders, some slip-and-fall incidents are inevitable. Victims must take it upon themselves to seek medical attention and secure legal representation.

For their part, healthcare providers should offer designated injury treatment and physical rehabilitation services for fall injury victims. Many fall-related injuries, such as head injuries, are difficult to diagnose and treat. Busy general ER doctors may not have sufficient expertise in these areas. Later, during physical therapy, patients often progress in fits and starts, especially if they’re over 65 (National Institutes of Health (NIH)).

Frequently, personal injury attorneys have the most difficult role of all. They must pull it all together. Attorneys advocate for victim-friendly laws that raise awareness of the problem, connect victims with necessary medical help, and most importantly, advocate for victims in the judicial process to obtain fair settlements based on the injuries, legal theories involved, and relevant laws and codes (American Bar Association).

Five Fast FAQs About Slip-and-Fall Injuries in NYC

How many slip-and-fall accidents happen in NYC each year?

It is difficult to determine the exact number of slip-and-fall injuries, as many hospitals do not have specific slip-and-fall admissions codes, and many victims are treated and released in emergency rooms without a formal record. However, we do know that slip-and-falls are the leading cause of injury-related hospitalizations in NYC.

How much do slip-and-fall accidents cost NYC taxpayers?

A significant amount. In addition to the $1 billion in settlements, NYC taxpayers spend over $100 million annually in direct costs, which include legal fees, medical expenses, and lost productivity from slip-and-fall incidents (New York City Comptroller’s Office).

What are the most common causes of slip-and-fall accidents in NYC?

Preventable hazards, such as uneven walkways, slippery surfaces, poor lighting, snow/ice buildup, and pathway obstructions, are the most common causes of slip-and-fall injuries in NYC. Property owner negligence is the common denominator among these causes.

Are property owners liable for slip-and-fall accidents in NYC?

Yes, property owners are liable if they have a duty of care to maintain a safe environment, or if city codes, such as NYC’s Administrative Code § 7-210 (which mandates the safe maintenance of sidewalks), impose such a duty on them. Additionally, a personal injury attorney must typically prove that the owner knew about, or should have known about, the injury-causing hazard (NYC Administrative Code).

How can I prevent slip-and-fall accidents on sidewalks?

Simple steps, such as regular inspections, prompt follow-ups, and adequate signage, can reduce the number of slip-and-fall injuries in NYC. Proactive measures, like installing non-slip surfaces and upgrading lighting, are even more effective. Non-property owners also play a role by advocating for victims and raising awareness of the problem (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)).

Five Fast Takeaways

Slip-and-fall injuries are not unavoidable accidents. Property owner negligence is the primary cause of most NYC slip-and-falls, with contributing factors including high foot traffic levels and outdated pedestrian infrastructure.

These injuries cost New Yorkers hundreds of millions of dollars annually through higher taxes and insurance premiums, covering medical treatment, emergency response, lost productivity, and personal injury settlements.

Generally, public and private property owners are liable for significant damages in these cases. Compensation typically includes economic losses, such as medical bills, and non-economic losses, such as pain and suffering.

Proactive measures can significantly reduce the risks and costs, especially for outdoor slip-and-fall injuries. These measures include making thorough winter weather preparations, having the right tools available (such as warning signs), performing regular inspections, and promptly removing fall injury hazards.

Reducing the number of slip-and-fall injuries requires a joint effort from property owners, city officials, lawyers, and community advocates.

Five-Point Property Owner Checklist

Assume that at least one person will slip and fall on your property this winter, and plan accordingly:

  • Upgrade infrastructure, including lighting and walkways.
  • Schedule frequent inspections and establish protocols for promptly addressing fall injury hazards.
  • Use warning signs with American National Standards Institute (ANSI)-approved information and graphics.
  • Carefully document all slip-and-fall incidents, whether or not the injury results in immediate hospitalization.

Do You Want to Know More?

Working together, concerned citizens, landlords, property owners, and other stakeholders can make winter streets safer for NYC residents and visitors. If you have been injured in a slip and fall accident contact the experienced personal injury lawyers at Dansker & Aspromonte Associates, LLP. for a free consultation. We routinely handle premises liability matters throughout the New York City metropolitan area.

Recover Your Life

Let Us Fight For You
Free & Confidential Consultation

By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request.

Unfortunately, based on your query, we are unable to assist you at this time. Our firm specializes in serious accidents and negligence cases, such as car accidents, slips and falls, construction accidents, and other accidents that require hospitalization or ongoing treatment.

Proven Record of Success

Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP has been advocating for the rights of the injured since 1986. We have the tools, resources, knowledge, and commitment to get you the best possible outcome.

Providing Answers & Solutions

Our team is committed to always being able to provide you with updates on your case and answers to your questions. This is your case and we want to be sure you are confident every step of the way.

Small Firm Dedication & Focus

Our firm is different from most firms in our area in that we are a “boutique” type firm that is small enough to give personal attention to our clients and yet experienced and powerful with a reputation as a hard-hitting litigation firm.

Innovative Legal Strategies

Each client that comes to our team gets a managing partner and trial partner dedicated to their case. We put our collective 100 years of experience behind your case to obtain the best possible outcome on your behalf.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, lo que lo dejó en coma y con graves lesiones cerebrales.
Esta contable caminaba después del trabajo en Battery Park en el paseo peatonal cuando de repente fue golpeada por una motoneta de la policía que iba a gran velocidad.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
La Sra. Y-H, pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un niño sufrió lesiones graves después de caerse mientras corría detrás de su autobús escolar y ser atropellado por las ruedas traseras. Este caso demuestra la habilidad de la firma para obtener compensación en accidentes que involucran autobuses escolares y menores.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
La Sra. Y-H era una pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, sufriendo lesiones graves, incluyendo un coma. Aunque es un caso de peatón, el incidente involucra un vehículo y demuestra la experiencia de la firma en manejar accidentes graves de tránsito.
A pesar del hecho de que este caso fue referido a Dansker & Aspromonte LLP Associates por otro abogado 17 años después de que ocurriera el accidente, se obtuvo un veredicto impresionante a través de una investigación cuidadosa y una preparación incansable.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este caso involucró a una niña de 6 años que estaba en una camioneta que fue golpeada por una ambulancia en un choque de varios autos en el Northern State Parkway en Long Island, Nueva York.
Una oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años sufrió lesiones graves mientras era pasajera en un automóvil policial en camino a una llamada de emergencia.
Un carpintero de 46 años cayó de una escalera que resbaló en el sitio de trabajo, lo que le causó lesiones significativas. Este caso ilustra la experiencia de la firma en accidentes de equipo defectuoso en entornos de construcción.
Un carpintero de 30 años cayó de una escalera en un sitio de trabajo en una tienda minorista, resultando en lesiones graves. Este caso subraya la capacidad de la firma para asegurar compensación en accidentes de caídas en proyectos de construcción.
Un inmigrante mexicano sin documentación cayó 30 pies desde un andamio en un sitio de construcción, sufriendo lesiones graves al impactar contra el cemento. Este caso demuestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas en el lugar de trabajo, comunes en la construcción.
Un trabajador de construcción sufrió fracturas en el hombro, clavícula, costillas y cadera, además de lesiones internas que requirieron múltiples cirugías. Este caso destaca la habilidad de la firma para manejar lesiones graves en el lugar de trabajo.
Baby S was born with a congenital hip dislocation which was not anyone’s fault. However, malpractice occurred when the doctors and hospital did not recognize the condition after she was born. Their failure to diagnose and properly treat the condition resulted in a slight but permanent deformity.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.
A 46-year-old carpenter was working on a straight ladder which had been leaned against the wall on a jobsite. He fell when the ladder slipped away from the wall. As a result, he suffered facial injuries and a fractured knee that required surgery. The property owner and general contractor were found to be responsible because Jian S. should have been provided with a more suitable A-frame ladder or scaffolding.
A 30-year-old carpenter who was working at a job site in a retail store fell from a ladder onto both feet. He suffered bilateral calcaneus fractures requiring multiple surgeries.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Maria, a housekeeper, was walking across Ocean Parkway in Brooklyn in the crosswalk when she was struck by a school bus and thrown over 25 feet. She sustained severe injuries, including multiple fractures. The bus driver claimed that he had a green light and was travelling at a safe speed. Unfortunately, Mrs. S. could not recall any of the facts of the accident. Our investigator combed the area for witnesses. He found a woman who lived on the sixth floor of an adjacent apartment building. Although she didn’t see the accident, she happened to look out her window and saw Maria’s body lying in the roadway down the street. Using this testimony, our accident reconstruction expert was able to prove that the bus had to be speeding to knock Maria that far from the crosswalk. The case was settled immediately after that testimony.
Our client was a married NYC Parks Department employee. On a snowy night in Staten Island, he was preparing his truck to spread salt on the roadways. He drove the spreader truck to the salt storage yard. As he waited alongside his truck, the operator of a front loader truck used to place the salt in the spreader lost control of the loading bucket. Sadly, he was struck by the bucket, suffered massive injuries and died in the hospital several hours later.
A 21-year-old developmentally disabled Chinese boy was walking with some friends after school when he stepped out into the crosswalk against the light and a City bus which was turning a little too close to the corner struck him. The young man had crippling injuries which prevented him from leaving the hospital where he died several months later. Despite the fact that eyewitnesses said the boy stepped into the street against the light, the law reduces an injured person’s share of liability in accordance with their mental capacity. At trial, it was proven through a guidance counselor from his school that he was intellectually comparable to a seven-year-old. Thereafter, the jury determined that this young man was not legally responsible for his actions and awarded 100% in his favor on the liability portion of the trial
In one of the most tragic cases this office has seen, two mothers and their four teenagers were driving to a high school swimming meet on the New York State Thruway in a van. When the driver suspected a flat tire, instead of pulling over onto the shoulder, the mother of two of the children inexplicably stopped the van in the right moving lane of traffic. Within a very short time, the driver of a tanker truck traveling at a steady 65 miles an hour who claimed not to see the stopped van, struck it at full speed, literally cutting the van in half. There were two survivors with grave injuries and four fatalities. We secured the maximum insurance that was available to cover these claims.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Un trabajador de construcción de 50 años estaba montando su bicicleta cuando cayó debido a un defecto en la carretera y sufrió pequeñas fracturas y daños cognitivos leves.
Un trabajador de mantenimiento de 31 años golpeó un sensor de presión de control de tráfico de la ciudad de Nueva York mientras montaba su bicicleta. Debido a un mal mantenimiento del sensor, el trabajador sufrió lesiones graves.
Una mujer y su novio estaban andando en bicicleta cuando entraron en un sitio de excavación sin protección en una zona completamente oscura bajo un paso elevado. La bicicleta de Rhonda cayó en un pozo y su cara se estrelló contra la carretera.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
La madre de Taylor había subido más de 50 libras durante el embarazo, estaba atrasada, y tuvo una prolongada primera y segunda etapa del parto.
Una joven madre china por primera vez resultó herida debido a la negligencia médica de los médicos y el personal de lo que entonces era el Hospital Beekman Downtown.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un guardia de seguridad resbaló en una superficie helada frente a un edificio propiedad de Metropolitan Life, lo que le causó una fractura de rodilla.
Una asistente de salud en el hogar de 56 años tropezó con un cable expuesto que se extendía desde una cabina telefónica en la plataforma del metro, resultando en una lesión que requirió un reemplazo de rodilla.
Un conductor de servicio se bajó de su vehículo para recoger dinero en el carril de un Burger King cuando cayó a través de una rejilla de alcantarillado rota, resultando en una caída de 4 pies y lesiones significativas.
Un trabajador de construcción indocumentado cayó desde un andamio a 30 pies de altura, impactando contra el cemento y sufriendo lesiones graves. Este caso muestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas graves en el trabajo, que se relacionan con incidentes de resbalones y caídas en entornos peligrosos.
Un niño de 16 años fue atropellado por un camión que estaba retrocediendo lentamente y quedó atrapado contra una pared, sufriendo una grave laceración en el bazo, que tuvo que ser removido.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
Adjudicado a la familia. Un hombre de 49 años cayó por el hueco de un ascensor cuando las puertas del ascensor se abrieron, pero la cabina del ascensor estaba en un piso superior.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este accidente ocurrió en el Bronx cuando Rafael C. estaba trabajando en un camión de saneamiento. El conductor perdió el control al girar el vehículo.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Un Oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años era una pasajera en un automóvil de la policía que iba a una llamada de emergencia.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.