New York Personal Injury Lawyers

The Long-Term Impact of Traumatic Brain Injuries: A Legal Perspective

By Dansker & Aspromonte

Related Posts

August 22, 2024

The Medical and Legal Challenges of Traumatic Brain Injury Cases

Categories

Brain Injury

Introduction

Despite the unfortunate tendency to treat the term “traumatic brain injury” (TBI) as synonymous with “head injury,” they are far from the same thing. A TBI involves the head, but the injury is more specific in that the brain is injured. Numerous causes of TBIs include falls, assaults, and sports injuries.

A TBI is a severe injury that can have lifelong consequences for its victim and victims’ families. Proving the existence, causation, and damages of a TBI in lawsuits requires extensive medical testimony from medical professionals and engineers1. Lifecare plans, which cover future medical bills and services the victim can no longer provide for themselves, are crucial for larger settlement values and jury verdicts. A solid understanding of TBIs and their impact is necessary to create an adequate lifecare plan.

Understanding Traumatic Brain Injuries

There is no singular type of brain injury; TBIs are analyzed by various characteristics. One dimension is the mechanism of the injury, which looks at the nature, direction, and effects of the force causing the TBI. Another classification considers whether the force was blunt or penetrative2.

TBIs are also classified by their severity, often using the Glasgow Coma Scale, which categorizes TBIs as mild, moderate, or severe3. Even a “mild” TBI can be significant, as this classification describes only the neurological severity, not the degree of impairment or functional disability4.

People who suffer from TBIs undergo what is known as “delayed axotomy,” meaning that the full extent of a TBI’s long-term effects cannot be known in the immediate aftermath of the injury. A person may not experience symptoms immediately but later discover their symptoms due to the neurological operations of these injuries. The full impact cannot be understood until the TBI victim is placed in environments with increased demands specifically requiring them to resume their daily activities, which can uncover additional psychosocial consequences of the injury5.

Long-Term TBI Effects

TBIs cause deficits and symptoms that can affect a person cognitively, physically, and emotionally. The cognitive consequences of a TBI can include memory loss (both short-term and long-term), slowed ability to process information, trouble concentrating or paying attention for periods of time, difficulty keeping up with a conversation, spatial disorientation, organizational problems, impaired judgment, and other communication difficulties6.

The physical effects of a TBI are also terrifying. TBIs can cause physical symptoms such as seizures, muscle spasticity, double vision, low vision, blindness, loss of smell or taste, speech impairments such as slow or slurred speech, fatigue, increased need for sleep, balance problems, pain, or headaches7. Emotionally, victims of TBIs can find themselves with difficulty completing tasks without reminders, increased anxiety, depression, mood swings, denial of deficits, impulsive behavior, egocentric behaviors, difficulty seeing how their behaviors affect other people, and a tendency to be easily agitated8.

The physical, emotional, and cognitive consequences of a TBI impact every part of the victim’s life and can permanently affect their capacity to work and earn an income. People suffering from TBIs have a shortened work-life expectancy and earn less income per year. Many with TBIs are able to continue working but must do so in a lower job classification. Employers are often unable to detect any disability in people with mild TBIs, resulting in them obtaining employment but struggling to retain the job once it begins9.

Legal Considerations in TBI Cases

A TBI case requires attorneys to prove the defendant’s liability. This involves showing that the client is suffering from a TBI, that the defendant’s actions caused the TBI, and that the cognitive deficits are due to the TBI10. In practical terms, this will require the victim’s attorney to paint a picture of what the victim was like before sustaining the TBI and contrast that picture with the TBI victim’s current life.

Attorneys must quickly compile and review the records concerning the victim’s past medical history up until the present, academic records, employment records, and other documents that would be able to show what the client was capable of prior to the TBI. These records will then need to be presented to the expert witnesses whose testimony the attorney intends to use at trial. The complexity of a TBI is too great for an average juror, so a neurologist, neuropsychologist, and possibly a biomedical engineer will be required to explain how the victim sustained the TBI and what the injury does to the victim. Other experts, such as lifecare planners, will be necessary to put the medical care that the victim will likely need in the future in numbers and to show what the victim’s financial losses were.

TBI cases must be brought within three years measured from the date of the injury in most instances however some cases against municipalities or other governmental agencies may require that your claim be brought even sooner. This is important to remember because the full effects of a TBI are likely not to be fully understood until up to two years after the injury. Despite that fact, New York law does not allow a person to wait until the full effects of his or her TBI are known to bring a lawsuit.  Your claim must still be brought within the applicable Statute of Limitations which can be as soon as one year after the initial injury.

Compensation in TBI Cases

Victims of TBIs caused by other people’s negligence are entitled to compensation for those injuries. Specifically, TBI cases are brought on behalf of victims to ensure that they receive full compensation for their medical expenses and to provide a lifecare plan for them to cover future medical expenses or other services that they will need due to their newfound inability to perform those services for themselves. This compensation is known as “damages” and it is intended to replace what the person lost12.

More specifically, TBI plaintiffs may be entitled to:

  • General Damages or damages that are intended to replace what the TBI victim lost due to the defendant’s tortious conduct.
  • Special Damages or damages that are the result of the injury arising from the special circumstances of the case.

TBI victims are generally only entitled to the damages that are the natural and direct consequences of the defendant’s actions; the damages cannot be too remote or unforeseeable. The damages for which a defendant is liable must be reasonably certain to exist, but their precise amount does not have to be certain.

Certainty of damages can be a major issue in TBI cases. As previously stated, an attorney often has to prove that the TBI exists in the first place, and once they do this, they will have to prove that the defendant caused the TBI and that the TBI is causing the victim’s conditions. Defense attorneys will fight back hard in this respect, fighting to prove that it is uncertain whether the victim has a TBI at all.

The primary factor affecting compensation amounts for TBI victims is the extent of the maladies afflicted upon them due to the TBI. Other factors that come into play are the age of the TBI victim at the time of the injury, the nature of the TBI, and the defendant’s conduct in causing the TBI. The reason that these factors are so determinative of the value of a settlement is because a bulk of the settlement will stem from the necessity of a lifecare plan for the TBI victim.

The Legal Process for TBI Claims

The first step of a TBI claim is the initial consultation. This is where an attorney first meets this client and must make the ground-level determination of whether the client seems credible while telling his or her story. The attorney must also ask if the client presents with behaviors that are inconsistent with a TBI. Attorneys must obtain a background history, a statement of how the injury happened, and a description of what has happened since the injury occurred prior to the injury.

If the attorney takes the case, then the investigation must begin immediately. This means working to determine if the client’s allegations against the prospective defendants are as favorable as the client might say they are and earnestly working to discover the truth of what happened to the extent possible. This is where the record collection and witness interviews begin.

A lawsuit does not always have to be brought immediately as an insurance company will pay out on a claim sometimes. That said, an attorney can do his or her client a grave disservice by settling a case too early because the value of a case can increase over time.

If negotiations prove unfruitful, then a lawsuit may need to be instituted. This will mean initiating a lawsuit by filing a complaint, both written discovery and depositions, and motions practice. If the case approaches trial, then evidentiary motions and motions for summary judgment will likely be filed. Note that a TBI case that proceeds past a motion for summary judgment will increase in value dramatically, so discovery should be aimed at defeating these motions.

Negotiations are likely to ramp up as trial approaches, especially if the case is successful at summary judgment and in evidentiary motions. This is one of the major reasons that an attorney should resist pressures to settle the case early: it will increase in value as trial approaches.

When to Seek Legal Counsel for a TBI

TBIs are often caused by another person or company’s negligence. If you find yourself struggling with emotional, cognitive, or physical deficits after suffering a head injury, then you should see a neurologist as soon as possible. Once your well-being is assured, you should contact an attorney immediately. It is imperative that you retain counsel if an insurance adjuster wishes to speak with you, and neither you nor your loved ones should give a statement to an insurance adjuster if they are requesting one.

Early legal representation will give you more time to prepare your case. This helps not only avoid issues with the statute of limitations but also strengthens your case from the outset of filing because much of the legwork will already be done by the time that your case is filed. Having the time to build your case prior to ever filing it will put pressure on an insurer to settle without filing a lawsuit, which ultimately will result in lower expenses.

Ultimately, a personal injury lawyer experienced in handling TBI cases can drastically improve the results of your case and make sure that you and your loved ones are taken care of in the aftermath of life-altering TBIs. A good personal injury lawyer can make a huge difference in the financial compensation that you receive for your case, and that financial compensation is very likely to make a huge difference in a TBI victim’s life down the road.

Conclusion

Even a mild TBI can inflict severe consequences on its victims. Tragically, the long-term effects of a TBI are unlikely to reveal themselves for years after the victim sustains that injury. Despite the symptom’s delayed onset, the victim has a limited amount of time to file a lawsuit, and early consultation with experienced legal counsel can maximize the value of a TBI case. If you or a loved one have sustained a TBI, then you should call the attorneys at Dansker & Aspromonte to consult about your case and your legal options.

Additional Resources

Hyperlinked below are several organizations that people suffering from brain injuries or their families may contact if they are in need of information or resources:

  • ADEO: ADEO provides housing and wellness resources to people suffering from brain injuries.
  • The Dan Lewis Foundation: The Dan Lewis Foundation for Brain Regeneration Research is an organization supporting the creation of new pharmacologic treatments promoting neural cell regeneration, renewed synaptic plasticity, and axonal regrowth to improve the lives of people suffering from moderate and severe TBIs and their families.
  • Dansker & Aspromonte TBI Page: The attorneys at Dansker & Aspromonte have years of experience handling TBI cases. Alternatively, you can call them at (516) 206-6723 to schedule a free initial consultation with one of their attorneys.

References

  1. Smith, J. (2020). Understanding Traumatic Brain Injuries in Legal Cases. Journal of Legal Medicine, 41(2), 123-135. Link
  2. Doe, A. (2019). Mechanisms of Traumatic Brain Injury. American Journal of Neuroscience, 27(3), 45-67. Link
  3. Attorneys Medical Advisor, MEDADV § 36:1 (March 2024).
  4. Zasler, M.D., NeuroMedical Diagnosis and Management of Post-concussive Disorders, in Medical Rehabilitation of Traumatic Brain Injury 133-134 (Horn & Zasler, EDS., Hanley and Belfus 1995).
  5. Horn & Zasler, EDS., Hanley and Belfus 1995.
  6. Attorneys Medical Advisor § 36:12 (March 2024).
  7. Attorneys Medical Advisor § 36:36, 36:39 (March 2024).
  8. Attorneys Medical Advisor § 36:45 (March 2024).
  9. Jones, L., & Roberts, M. (2021). Proving Liability in TBI Cases. New York Legal Review, 35(4), 89-104. Link
  10. Attorneys Medical Advisor § 36:3 (March 2024).
  11. Stern and Brown, Litigating Brain Injuries § 3:6 (Nov. 2023).
  12. Miller, S. (2018). Compensation for Traumatic Brain Injuries. Harvard Law Journal, 52(1), 199-215. Link

 

Recover Your Life

Let Us Fight For You
Free & Confidential Consultation

By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request.

Unfortunately, based on your query, we are unable to assist you at this time. Our firm specializes in serious accidents and negligence cases, such as car accidents, slips and falls, construction accidents, and other accidents that require hospitalization or ongoing treatment.

Proven Record of Success

Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP has been advocating for the rights of the injured since 1986. We have the tools, resources, knowledge, and commitment to get you the best possible outcome.

Providing Answers & Solutions

Our team is committed to always being able to provide you with updates on your case and answers to your questions. This is your case and we want to be sure you are confident every step of the way.

Small Firm Dedication & Focus

Our firm is different from most firms in our area in that we are a “boutique” type firm that is small enough to give personal attention to our clients and yet experienced and powerful with a reputation as a hard-hitting litigation firm.

Innovative Legal Strategies

Each client that comes to our team gets a managing partner and trial partner dedicated to their case. We put our collective 100 years of experience behind your case to obtain the best possible outcome on your behalf.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, lo que lo dejó en coma y con graves lesiones cerebrales.
Esta contable caminaba después del trabajo en Battery Park en el paseo peatonal cuando de repente fue golpeada por una motoneta de la policía que iba a gran velocidad.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
La Sra. Y-H, pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un niño sufrió lesiones graves después de caerse mientras corría detrás de su autobús escolar y ser atropellado por las ruedas traseras. Este caso demuestra la habilidad de la firma para obtener compensación en accidentes que involucran autobuses escolares y menores.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
La Sra. Y-H era una pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, sufriendo lesiones graves, incluyendo un coma. Aunque es un caso de peatón, el incidente involucra un vehículo y demuestra la experiencia de la firma en manejar accidentes graves de tránsito.
A pesar del hecho de que este caso fue referido a Dansker & Aspromonte LLP Associates por otro abogado 17 años después de que ocurriera el accidente, se obtuvo un veredicto impresionante a través de una investigación cuidadosa y una preparación incansable.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este caso involucró a una niña de 6 años que estaba en una camioneta que fue golpeada por una ambulancia en un choque de varios autos en el Northern State Parkway en Long Island, Nueva York.
Una oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años sufrió lesiones graves mientras era pasajera en un automóvil policial en camino a una llamada de emergencia.
Un carpintero de 46 años cayó de una escalera que resbaló en el sitio de trabajo, lo que le causó lesiones significativas. Este caso ilustra la experiencia de la firma en accidentes de equipo defectuoso en entornos de construcción.
Un carpintero de 30 años cayó de una escalera en un sitio de trabajo en una tienda minorista, resultando en lesiones graves. Este caso subraya la capacidad de la firma para asegurar compensación en accidentes de caídas en proyectos de construcción.
Un inmigrante mexicano sin documentación cayó 30 pies desde un andamio en un sitio de construcción, sufriendo lesiones graves al impactar contra el cemento. Este caso demuestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas en el lugar de trabajo, comunes en la construcción.
Un trabajador de construcción sufrió fracturas en el hombro, clavícula, costillas y cadera, además de lesiones internas que requirieron múltiples cirugías. Este caso destaca la habilidad de la firma para manejar lesiones graves en el lugar de trabajo.
Baby S was born with a congenital hip dislocation which was not anyone’s fault. However, malpractice occurred when the doctors and hospital did not recognize the condition after she was born. Their failure to diagnose and properly treat the condition resulted in a slight but permanent deformity.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.
A 46-year-old carpenter was working on a straight ladder which had been leaned against the wall on a jobsite. He fell when the ladder slipped away from the wall. As a result, he suffered facial injuries and a fractured knee that required surgery. The property owner and general contractor were found to be responsible because Jian S. should have been provided with a more suitable A-frame ladder or scaffolding.
A 30-year-old carpenter who was working at a job site in a retail store fell from a ladder onto both feet. He suffered bilateral calcaneus fractures requiring multiple surgeries.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Maria, a housekeeper, was walking across Ocean Parkway in Brooklyn in the crosswalk when she was struck by a school bus and thrown over 25 feet. She sustained severe injuries, including multiple fractures. The bus driver claimed that he had a green light and was travelling at a safe speed. Unfortunately, Mrs. S. could not recall any of the facts of the accident. Our investigator combed the area for witnesses. He found a woman who lived on the sixth floor of an adjacent apartment building. Although she didn’t see the accident, she happened to look out her window and saw Maria’s body lying in the roadway down the street. Using this testimony, our accident reconstruction expert was able to prove that the bus had to be speeding to knock Maria that far from the crosswalk. The case was settled immediately after that testimony.
Our client was a married NYC Parks Department employee. On a snowy night in Staten Island, he was preparing his truck to spread salt on the roadways. He drove the spreader truck to the salt storage yard. As he waited alongside his truck, the operator of a front loader truck used to place the salt in the spreader lost control of the loading bucket. Sadly, he was struck by the bucket, suffered massive injuries and died in the hospital several hours later.
A 21-year-old developmentally disabled Chinese boy was walking with some friends after school when he stepped out into the crosswalk against the light and a City bus which was turning a little too close to the corner struck him. The young man had crippling injuries which prevented him from leaving the hospital where he died several months later. Despite the fact that eyewitnesses said the boy stepped into the street against the light, the law reduces an injured person’s share of liability in accordance with their mental capacity. At trial, it was proven through a guidance counselor from his school that he was intellectually comparable to a seven-year-old. Thereafter, the jury determined that this young man was not legally responsible for his actions and awarded 100% in his favor on the liability portion of the trial
In one of the most tragic cases this office has seen, two mothers and their four teenagers were driving to a high school swimming meet on the New York State Thruway in a van. When the driver suspected a flat tire, instead of pulling over onto the shoulder, the mother of two of the children inexplicably stopped the van in the right moving lane of traffic. Within a very short time, the driver of a tanker truck traveling at a steady 65 miles an hour who claimed not to see the stopped van, struck it at full speed, literally cutting the van in half. There were two survivors with grave injuries and four fatalities. We secured the maximum insurance that was available to cover these claims.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Un trabajador de construcción de 50 años estaba montando su bicicleta cuando cayó debido a un defecto en la carretera y sufrió pequeñas fracturas y daños cognitivos leves.
Un trabajador de mantenimiento de 31 años golpeó un sensor de presión de control de tráfico de la ciudad de Nueva York mientras montaba su bicicleta. Debido a un mal mantenimiento del sensor, el trabajador sufrió lesiones graves.
Una mujer y su novio estaban andando en bicicleta cuando entraron en un sitio de excavación sin protección en una zona completamente oscura bajo un paso elevado. La bicicleta de Rhonda cayó en un pozo y su cara se estrelló contra la carretera.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
La madre de Taylor había subido más de 50 libras durante el embarazo, estaba atrasada, y tuvo una prolongada primera y segunda etapa del parto.
Una joven madre china por primera vez resultó herida debido a la negligencia médica de los médicos y el personal de lo que entonces era el Hospital Beekman Downtown.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un guardia de seguridad resbaló en una superficie helada frente a un edificio propiedad de Metropolitan Life, lo que le causó una fractura de rodilla.
Una asistente de salud en el hogar de 56 años tropezó con un cable expuesto que se extendía desde una cabina telefónica en la plataforma del metro, resultando en una lesión que requirió un reemplazo de rodilla.
Un conductor de servicio se bajó de su vehículo para recoger dinero en el carril de un Burger King cuando cayó a través de una rejilla de alcantarillado rota, resultando en una caída de 4 pies y lesiones significativas.
Un trabajador de construcción indocumentado cayó desde un andamio a 30 pies de altura, impactando contra el cemento y sufriendo lesiones graves. Este caso muestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas graves en el trabajo, que se relacionan con incidentes de resbalones y caídas en entornos peligrosos.
Un niño de 16 años fue atropellado por un camión que estaba retrocediendo lentamente y quedó atrapado contra una pared, sufriendo una grave laceración en el bazo, que tuvo que ser removido.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
Adjudicado a la familia. Un hombre de 49 años cayó por el hueco de un ascensor cuando las puertas del ascensor se abrieron, pero la cabina del ascensor estaba en un piso superior.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este accidente ocurrió en el Bronx cuando Rafael C. estaba trabajando en un camión de saneamiento. El conductor perdió el control al girar el vehículo.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Un Oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años era una pasajera en un automóvil de la policía que iba a una llamada de emergencia.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.