New York Personal Injury Lawyers

Legal Rights and Protections in Nursing Home Abuse Cases in NYC

By Dansker & Aspromonte

Related Posts

April 7, 2025

Successful Nursing Home Abuse Lawsuits in NYC

Categories

Nursing Home Justice

Legal Rights and Protections in Nursing Home Abuse Cases in NYC

A 2021 study estimated that roughly 11.4% of older adults in New York State will experience some form of abuse over a ten-year period.[1]  That jarring statistic translates to more than 360,000 older people suffering this type of abuse over that ten-year period.[2]  New York State has made great efforts to reduce these numbers, but, sadly, New York State’s incidence rate of the abuse of older people is higher than the national average of 9.5%.[3]

Elderly people are some of the most vulnerable people in New York and in our society.  It is imperative that they be treated with dignity and respect, and it anyone who abuses older people must be held accountable under both federal and New York law.

Recognizing this, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed legislation requiring nursing homes to publicly display their most recent ratings for their health inspections, staffing, and quality measures as determined by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (the “CMS”) rating system.[4]  These star ratings will help consumers find quality nursing homes that can best meet their needs, but New York can and must do more to protect these vulnerable people.

If you or an older person you care about have been the victim of nursing home abuse then reach out to our nursing home abuse attorneys at Dansker & Aspromonte to schedule your free consultation.  Our attorneys will fight for you to ensure that you receive the dignity, respect, and ultimately, the compensation you deserve.  Call us today at (516) 774-3988, or contact us through our online portal, which is linked here.

Types of Nursing Home Abuse

Nursing home abuse is a common problem that takes many forms.  Defined broadly, nursing home abuse is any action or lack of appropriate actions that cause harm, risk causing harm, or distress a person who is sixty-years (60) of age or older when that action or inaction (a) occurs in a relationship where there is an expectation of trust or (b) occurs when the action is directed towards the older person because of the person’s age.[5]

Each of the most common forms of nursing home abuse will be addressed below.

Physical Abuse

While it seems unimaginable, there are those who would inflict physical pain on the elderly.  The term physical abuse pertains to any intentional application of physical force to an elderly person’s body that results in bodily injury, pain, or any other type of impairment.[6]  Physical abuse is a common form of nursing home abuse, as roughly 9.3% of all nursing home abuse victims are the victims of physical abuse.[7]

The typical signs of physical abuse include:

  • unexplained bruises, cuts, burns, or scars;
  • weight loss that cannot be explained;
  • the older person have a dismissive attitude or making dismissive statements regarding his or her injuries;
  • the older person having unreasonable fears or suspicions regarding seemingly innocuous things; and
  • sudden, unexplained changes in behavior.[8]

Neglect

Another very common form of abuse is neglect.  Neglect differs from physical, financial, and emotional abuse in that neglect occurs when someone fails to fulfill his or her duties to the older person for whose care he or she is responsible.[9]  Neglect can be unintentional, but the term also encompasses an intentional failure to provide care to the older person.[10]

Instances of neglect by a caretaker will commonly come in two forms[11]:

  • Active Neglect: This form of neglect is intentional. It is the withholding of items necessary for the older person’s daily life—including food, exercise, medicine, personal hygiene, companionship.
  • Passive Neglect: The second form of neglect is unintentional. Common forms of passive neglect include leaving the older person alone for long periods of time, isolating the person, or just forgetting about or ignoring them altogether.

Though this list is not exclusive, these are a few signs of neglect:

  • unexplained bruises or cuts indicating that the older person has fallen;
  • a lack of basic hygiene;
  • unexplained weight loss in the older person due to a lack of food or water;
  • dirty or inappropriate clothing for the weather or conditions;
  • untreated bedsores; or
  • unpaid bills despite having adequate financial resources.

Financial Exploitation

Somewhere around 13.8% of all nursing home abuse cases will involve some kind of financial abuse.[12]  In this context, financial abuse is defined broadly because it can appear quite complex, but at bottom, financial abuse is the unauthorized use or theft of the older person’s funds, property, or other resources.[13]

The financial exploitation of an older person can be difficult to detect because of the myriad complexities in the ways that it can happen.  However, there will be signs of financial exploitation, including:

  • large withdrawals from bank accounts;
  • unusual ATM activity; and
  • unpaid bills or other signs of insufficient care.

Emotional Abuse

Emotional abuse refers to incidents of abuse in which the abuser intentionally inflects mental or emotional anguish by threatening, humiliating, or intimidating the older person.[14]  A few concrete examples of emotional abuse include:

  • isolating the older person from family and friends;
  • treating the older person like a child; or
  • intentionally interrupting the older person’s daily activities.[15]

Approximately 64.2% of all reported incidents of nursing home abuse are incidents of emotional or psychological abuse, and it is the most commonly reported form of nursing home abuse.[16]

Legal Rights and Protections

Thankfully, both New York State and the federal government have taken steps to address the scourge of nursing home abuse.  These protective measures are addressed below.

New York Public Health Laws

The New York Nursing Home Bill of Rights

New York has also adopted a “Bill of Rights” protecting nursing home residents.  This Bill of Rights must be posted in a public place in every nursing home or facility providing health-related services.[17]  Under the Bill of Rights, nursing home residents in New York State have the right to:

  • dignity, respect, and a comfortable living environment;
  • quality care and treatment without discrimination;
  • freedom of choice to make their own decisions;
  • written notice and information regarding the services and fees they will incur from a nursing home;
  • security in their money and property;
  • appeal any transfer or discharge from a nursing home with the New York State Department of Health;
  • privacy in their communications;
  • choose their schedule, what activities they do, and any other preferences that are important to them;
  • receive visitors at the time of their choosing;
  • a navigable, responsive complaint procedure when the nursing home fails in some aspect;
  • be free from all verbal, sexual, mental, and physical abuse—including restraints; and
  • exercise all of these rights without the fear of retribution.[18]

Minimum Staffing and Direct Residential Care Spending Requirements

Beyond the Bill of Rights, New York’s Public Health Laws also dictate how nursing homes spend their revenue.[19]  New York nursing homes are required to spend—at a minimum—seventy-percent (70%) of their revenue on direct resident care.[20]  Moreso, forty-percent (40%) of their revenue must be spent on resident-facing staff—though this 40% is included as part of the 70% that must be spent on direct resident care.[21]  The New York Public Health Laws intend to protect residents’ safety by mandating investments in both the facility and in adequate staffing. New York nursing homes that fail to comply with the New York Public Health Laws are subject to financial penalties of up to $2,000 per day for each day in a quarter that a facility fails to comply with these minimum nursing staff requirements.[22]

Filing Suit Against Nursing Home Facilities

New York explicitly authorizes the filing of a lawsuit whenever a nursing home resident’s rights are violated by a nursing home.[23]  In the context of filing a lawsuit, a nursing home resident’s rights are violated whenever a nursing home facility fails to comply with:

  • the terms of a contract;
  • any New York State statute, code, rule, or regulation; or
  • any applicable federal statute, code, rule, or regulation.[24]

A violation of those rights is actionable in a lawsuit if both (a) the right or benefit violated was created for the benefit of the nursing home resident and (b) the nursing home resident has suffered an injury.[25]  The “injury” can be physical or emotional harm, financial loss, or even death—reflecting the realities of nursing home abuse and its multi-faceted harms.[26]

The Elder Justice Act

Passed in 2009, the Elder Justice Act is an act of congress established by Section 6703(b) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the “ACA”).[27]  The ACA established new enhanced reporting requirements for owners, operators, employees, managers, agents, or contractors for any “long-term care facility.”[28]

The phrase “long-term care facility” means a residential care provider that arranges for or directly provides long-term care.[29]  The ACA goes on to define the phrase “long-term care” to mean supportive and health services for people who need assistance because they have a “loss of capacity” for self-care due to illness, disability, or vulnerability.[30]  But the ACA goes on, defining “loss of capacity” expansively to mean an inability to engage in 1 or more activities of daily living, which include the inability to eat, dress oneself, bathe oneself, or manage one’s own financial affairs.[31]  These broad definitions massively expands the number of people who are obligated to report nursing home abuse under the law.

The Elder Justice Act doesn’t just expand the number of mandatory reporters in the nursing home context: it specifies what they must report, to whom they must report it, and the time frame in which they must report it.[32]  Under the Elder Justice Act:

  • mandatory reporters must report “any reasonable suspicion of a crime” against any person who resides in or receives care from their long-term care facility;
  • mandatory reporters must report their reasonable suspicion to at least one law enforcement entity in their jurisdiction;
  • they must make their report no later than 24 hours after forming their reasonable suspicion if the resident is not injured, and
  • the mandatory reporter must report their reasonable suspicion of a crime within two (2) hours if the older person suffered a serious bodily injury, though these timelines may be subject to exceptions under certain circumstances.[33]

Reporting Nursing Home Abuse in New York

New York State has multiple agencies to which nursing home abuse can be reported, including:

  • New York State Adult Protective Services (“APS”): APS intakes, investigates, and assesses referrals of abuse, neglect, and financial exploitation of adults who cannot protect themselves. APS is for cases in which the older person does not have someone who is willing and able to assist responsibly.
  • New York State Department of Health (“DOH”): DOH specifically addresses complaints about nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and adult care facilities licensed by the state. A complaint against a nursing home can be filed by calling their hotline: 1-888-201-4563.  Alternatively, a complaint can be filed on DOH’s website, which you will find linked here.
  • New York State Department of Financial Services (“DFS”): Complaints of exploitation, fraud, scams, or other unauthorized transactions can be reported to the New York Department of Financial Services at this link.

Conclusion

Many nursing homes and residential-care facilities are well-intentioned, high-quality facilities that work hard to provide a good life to their residents, but sadly, there are facilities that place profits over people and fail to live up to their moral and legal obligations.  Facilities like these propagate elder abuse in its myriad forms, including financial, physical, emotional, and neglect.  Both federal and New York law aim to end elder abuse by requiring mandatory reporting, guaranteeing residents’ rights, and commanding staffing and facility-investments.  Remember: you can still make a report even if it is not your obligation to do so under the law, and you absolutely should where warranted.

There has been great progress on nursing home abuse issues, but there are still those who would victimize the most vulnerable among us.

If you are in need of an attorney to enforce the rights of an older person in your life and hold a nursing home accountable for their injuries then reach out to Dansker & Aspromonte.  Understanding your loved one’s rights and legal options is paramount in stopping the abuse and bringing the abusers to justice.  Our nursing home abuse attorneys are available for an initial consultation at no cost to you.  Schedule your free consultation with our attorneys by calling us at (516) 774-3988 or by reaching out to us through our online portal, which is linked here.

 

[1]  David Burnes, et al., “Estimated Incidence and Factors Associated With Risk of Elder Mistreatment in New York State,” (Apr. 18, 2022), https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9014652/.

[2]  David Burnes, et al., “Estimated Incidence and Factors Associated With Risk of Elder Mistreatment in New York State,” (Apr. 18, 2022), https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9014652/.

[3]  David Burnes, et al., “Estimated Incidence and Factors Associated With Risk of Elder Mistreatment in New York State,” (Apr. 18, 2022), https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9014652/.

[4]  LeadingAge New York, “Governor Signs Law Enacting Additional Nursing Home Posting Requirements” (Oct. 1, 2024), https://www.leadingageny.org/advocacy/main/government-politics-and-advocacy-blog/governor-signs-law-enacting-additional-nursing-home-posting-requirements/.

[5]  New York State Bar Association, “Elder Abuse: An FAQ for Attorneys” (accessed 2/12/2025), https://nysba.org/app/uploads/2020/02/elderabuseFAQ-2.pdf.

[6]  N.Y. Elder Law Practice § 1:6 (2024 ed.).

[7]  Yongjie Yon, et al., The prevalence of elder abuse in institutional settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur. J. Pub. Health (Feb. 2019), https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29878101/.

[8]  “Elder Abuse: How to spot warning signs, get help, and report mistreatment”, American Psychological Association (Updated July 8, 2024), https://www.apa.org/topics/aging-older-adults/elder-abuse.

[9]  N.Y. Elder Law Practice § 1:6 (2024 ed.).

[10]  N.Y. Elder Law Practice § 1:6 (2024 ed.).

[11]  N.Y. Elder Law Practice § 1:6 (2024 ed.).

[12]  Yongjie Yon, et al., The prevalence of elder abuse in institutional settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur. J. Pub. Health (Feb. 2019), https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29878101/.

[13]  N.Y. Elder Law Practice § 1:6 (2024 ed.).

[14]  N.Y. Elder Law Practice § 1:6 (2024 ed.).

[15]  N.Y. Elder Law Practice § 1:6 (2024 ed.).

[16]  Yongjie Yon, et al., The prevalence of elder abuse in institutional settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur. J. Pub. Health (Feb. 2019), https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29878101/.

[17]  N.Y. Pub. Health Law § 2803-c (McKinnney).

[18]  N.Y. Pub. Health Laws § 2803-c (McKinney); New York Department of Health, “Your Rights as a Nursing Home Resident in New York State” (accessed February 7, 2025), https://www.health.ny.gov/facilities/nursing/rights/.

[19]  N.Y. Pub. Health Laws § 2828 (McKinney).

[20]  N.Y. Pub. Health Laws § 2828 (McKinney).

[21]  N.Y. Pub. Health Laws § 2828 (McKinney).

[22]  New York State Department of Health, “Nursing Home Minimum Staffing and Direct Resident Care Spending” (accessed February 7, 2025), https://www.health.ny.gov/facilities/nursing/minimum_staffing/.

[23]  N.Y. Pub. Health Laws § 2801-d (McKinnney).

[24]  N.Y. Pub. Health Laws § 2801-d (McKinnney).

[25]  N.Y. Pub. Health Laws § 2801-d (McKinnney).

[26]  N.Y. Pub. Health Laws § 2801-d (McKinnney).

[27]  42 USCA § 1397j.  See also Elder Justice Act Under 6703(B)(3) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (accessed Feb. 6, 2025), https://opwdd.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2020/01/eja-attachment.pdf

[28]  42 USCA § 1320b-25.

[29]  42 USCA § 1397j.

[30]  42 USCA § 1397j.

[31]  42 USCA § 1397j.

[32]  42 USCA § 1320b-25.

[33]  42 USCA § 1320b-25.

Recover Your Life

Let Us Fight For You
Free & Confidential Consultation

By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request.

Unfortunately, based on your query, we are unable to assist you at this time. Our firm specializes in serious accidents and negligence cases, such as car accidents, slips and falls, construction accidents, and other accidents that require hospitalization or ongoing treatment.

Proven Record of Success

Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP has been advocating for the rights of the injured since 1986. We have the tools, resources, knowledge, and commitment to get you the best possible outcome.

Providing Answers & Solutions

Our team is committed to always being able to provide you with updates on your case and answers to your questions. This is your case and we want to be sure you are confident every step of the way.

Small Firm Dedication & Focus

Our firm is different from most firms in our area in that we are a “boutique” type firm that is small enough to give personal attention to our clients and yet experienced and powerful with a reputation as a hard-hitting litigation firm.

Innovative Legal Strategies

Each client that comes to our team gets a managing partner and trial partner dedicated to their case. We put our collective 100 years of experience behind your case to obtain the best possible outcome on your behalf.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, lo que lo dejó en coma y con graves lesiones cerebrales.
Esta contable caminaba después del trabajo en Battery Park en el paseo peatonal cuando de repente fue golpeada por una motoneta de la policía que iba a gran velocidad.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
La Sra. Y-H, pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un niño sufrió lesiones graves después de caerse mientras corría detrás de su autobús escolar y ser atropellado por las ruedas traseras. Este caso demuestra la habilidad de la firma para obtener compensación en accidentes que involucran autobuses escolares y menores.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
La Sra. Y-H era una pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, sufriendo lesiones graves, incluyendo un coma. Aunque es un caso de peatón, el incidente involucra un vehículo y demuestra la experiencia de la firma en manejar accidentes graves de tránsito.
A pesar del hecho de que este caso fue referido a Dansker & Aspromonte LLP Associates por otro abogado 17 años después de que ocurriera el accidente, se obtuvo un veredicto impresionante a través de una investigación cuidadosa y una preparación incansable.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este caso involucró a una niña de 6 años que estaba en una camioneta que fue golpeada por una ambulancia en un choque de varios autos en el Northern State Parkway en Long Island, Nueva York.
Una oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años sufrió lesiones graves mientras era pasajera en un automóvil policial en camino a una llamada de emergencia.
Un carpintero de 46 años cayó de una escalera que resbaló en el sitio de trabajo, lo que le causó lesiones significativas. Este caso ilustra la experiencia de la firma en accidentes de equipo defectuoso en entornos de construcción.
Un carpintero de 30 años cayó de una escalera en un sitio de trabajo en una tienda minorista, resultando en lesiones graves. Este caso subraya la capacidad de la firma para asegurar compensación en accidentes de caídas en proyectos de construcción.
Un inmigrante mexicano sin documentación cayó 30 pies desde un andamio en un sitio de construcción, sufriendo lesiones graves al impactar contra el cemento. Este caso demuestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas en el lugar de trabajo, comunes en la construcción.
Un trabajador de construcción sufrió fracturas en el hombro, clavícula, costillas y cadera, además de lesiones internas que requirieron múltiples cirugías. Este caso destaca la habilidad de la firma para manejar lesiones graves en el lugar de trabajo.
Baby S was born with a congenital hip dislocation which was not anyone’s fault. However, malpractice occurred when the doctors and hospital did not recognize the condition after she was born. Their failure to diagnose and properly treat the condition resulted in a slight but permanent deformity.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.
A 46-year-old carpenter was working on a straight ladder which had been leaned against the wall on a jobsite. He fell when the ladder slipped away from the wall. As a result, he suffered facial injuries and a fractured knee that required surgery. The property owner and general contractor were found to be responsible because Jian S. should have been provided with a more suitable A-frame ladder or scaffolding.
A 30-year-old carpenter who was working at a job site in a retail store fell from a ladder onto both feet. He suffered bilateral calcaneus fractures requiring multiple surgeries.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Maria, a housekeeper, was walking across Ocean Parkway in Brooklyn in the crosswalk when she was struck by a school bus and thrown over 25 feet. She sustained severe injuries, including multiple fractures. The bus driver claimed that he had a green light and was travelling at a safe speed. Unfortunately, Mrs. S. could not recall any of the facts of the accident. Our investigator combed the area for witnesses. He found a woman who lived on the sixth floor of an adjacent apartment building. Although she didn’t see the accident, she happened to look out her window and saw Maria’s body lying in the roadway down the street. Using this testimony, our accident reconstruction expert was able to prove that the bus had to be speeding to knock Maria that far from the crosswalk. The case was settled immediately after that testimony.
Our client was a married NYC Parks Department employee. On a snowy night in Staten Island, he was preparing his truck to spread salt on the roadways. He drove the spreader truck to the salt storage yard. As he waited alongside his truck, the operator of a front loader truck used to place the salt in the spreader lost control of the loading bucket. Sadly, he was struck by the bucket, suffered massive injuries and died in the hospital several hours later.
A 21-year-old developmentally disabled Chinese boy was walking with some friends after school when he stepped out into the crosswalk against the light and a City bus which was turning a little too close to the corner struck him. The young man had crippling injuries which prevented him from leaving the hospital where he died several months later. Despite the fact that eyewitnesses said the boy stepped into the street against the light, the law reduces an injured person’s share of liability in accordance with their mental capacity. At trial, it was proven through a guidance counselor from his school that he was intellectually comparable to a seven-year-old. Thereafter, the jury determined that this young man was not legally responsible for his actions and awarded 100% in his favor on the liability portion of the trial
In one of the most tragic cases this office has seen, two mothers and their four teenagers were driving to a high school swimming meet on the New York State Thruway in a van. When the driver suspected a flat tire, instead of pulling over onto the shoulder, the mother of two of the children inexplicably stopped the van in the right moving lane of traffic. Within a very short time, the driver of a tanker truck traveling at a steady 65 miles an hour who claimed not to see the stopped van, struck it at full speed, literally cutting the van in half. There were two survivors with grave injuries and four fatalities. We secured the maximum insurance that was available to cover these claims.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Un trabajador de construcción de 50 años estaba montando su bicicleta cuando cayó debido a un defecto en la carretera y sufrió pequeñas fracturas y daños cognitivos leves.
Un trabajador de mantenimiento de 31 años golpeó un sensor de presión de control de tráfico de la ciudad de Nueva York mientras montaba su bicicleta. Debido a un mal mantenimiento del sensor, el trabajador sufrió lesiones graves.
Una mujer y su novio estaban andando en bicicleta cuando entraron en un sitio de excavación sin protección en una zona completamente oscura bajo un paso elevado. La bicicleta de Rhonda cayó en un pozo y su cara se estrelló contra la carretera.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
La madre de Taylor había subido más de 50 libras durante el embarazo, estaba atrasada, y tuvo una prolongada primera y segunda etapa del parto.
Una joven madre china por primera vez resultó herida debido a la negligencia médica de los médicos y el personal de lo que entonces era el Hospital Beekman Downtown.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un guardia de seguridad resbaló en una superficie helada frente a un edificio propiedad de Metropolitan Life, lo que le causó una fractura de rodilla.
Una asistente de salud en el hogar de 56 años tropezó con un cable expuesto que se extendía desde una cabina telefónica en la plataforma del metro, resultando en una lesión que requirió un reemplazo de rodilla.
Un conductor de servicio se bajó de su vehículo para recoger dinero en el carril de un Burger King cuando cayó a través de una rejilla de alcantarillado rota, resultando en una caída de 4 pies y lesiones significativas.
Un trabajador de construcción indocumentado cayó desde un andamio a 30 pies de altura, impactando contra el cemento y sufriendo lesiones graves. Este caso muestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas graves en el trabajo, que se relacionan con incidentes de resbalones y caídas en entornos peligrosos.
Un niño de 16 años fue atropellado por un camión que estaba retrocediendo lentamente y quedó atrapado contra una pared, sufriendo una grave laceración en el bazo, que tuvo que ser removido.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
Adjudicado a la familia. Un hombre de 49 años cayó por el hueco de un ascensor cuando las puertas del ascensor se abrieron, pero la cabina del ascensor estaba en un piso superior.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este accidente ocurrió en el Bronx cuando Rafael C. estaba trabajando en un camión de saneamiento. El conductor perdió el control al girar el vehículo.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Un Oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años era una pasajera en un automóvil de la policía que iba a una llamada de emergencia.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.