New York Personal Injury Lawyers

Maximizing Wrongful Death Settlements in New York: Insights from a $21.5 Million Case

By Dansker & Aspromonte

Related Posts

December 4, 2024

Grieving Families Call on New York State

Categories

Family in courtroom

Maximizing Wrongful Death Settlements in New York: Insights from a $21.5 Million Case

After losing a loved one, many families are left reeling, both emotionally and financially.  Money can never fill the whole of a lost loved one, but it is crucial to take care of the families of people killed by the wrongful acts of others.

Wrongful death cases often produce eye-popping jury verdicts, and even the settlements, which are consistently less expensive than going to trial, are sizeable.  At Dansker & Aspromonte, our attorneys have years of experience litigating these grave cases, and the results we have achieved for our clients speak for themselves.

Not only are these successes numerous, they are also recent.  As discussed below, our attorneys recently settled a case for one of our clients for $21.5 million dollars.  That money is going to be put into a structured annuity for the client’s family.  While a precise number can never be guaranteed, our firm is here to provide a free consultation to you about your case.

Understanding Wrongful Death Settlements in New York

New York enacted a statute that allows wrongful death claims, and the state enshrined the right to bring a wrongful death claim in the constitution in 1984.[1]  Prior to that statute, there was no common law right to bring a wrongful death action.[2]  Even today, New York courts strictly construe the wrongful death statute and require anyone seeking to bring a wrongful death claim to comply with exacting statutory requirements.[3]

When filed, wrongful death claims are often high value cases in terms of their finances due to the gravity of the injuries involved.  Generally, the value of a settlement in these cases is impacted by:

  1. Whether the decedent had children, how many children he or she had, and how old those children were;
  2. The financial situation of the decedent, with families losing more financially successful decedents having larger numbers due to a greater demonstrable pecuniary loss;
  3. The viability of the underlying personal injury claim that the deceased person would have had; and
  4. Whether the defendant would have any viable defenses against the claims being brought.

Ultimately, it takes a skilled lawyer with a deep understanding of the law, insurance companies, and the statutory framework of New York’s wrongful death statute to maximize the value of a wrongful death claim.  Choosing a lawyer to represent you is one of the most important choices you will ever make, and you need to make sure to get the right lawyer for the right case.

If you have questions about your legal rights in the wake of the loss of a loved one, reach out to the attorneys at Dansker & Aspromonte by contacting them at our webpage, which is linked here, or by calling them at (516) 206-6723.

The $21.5 Million Case Study

The attorneys at Dansker & Aspromonte settled a wrongful death case for $21.5 million.  In that case, the client was ejected from a sanitation truck when it made a turn, and that same truck then ran over his leg.  The treating surgeon found his leg was bleeding internally, and the vascular surgeon who was to perform the necessary surgery did not arrive for more than two hours.  Tragically, the client passed away from an abdominal compartment syndrome after his abdomen had filled with enough fluid to cause organ failure.

The client was survived by his wife and two daughters, who were six and one.  To help his family, the attorneys at Dansker & Aspromonte brought this case in New York state court on theories of negligence against the sanitation truck and a malpractice claim against the doctors.

Their work resulted in a $21.5 million dollar settlement, a portion of which was placed in a structured annuity that will protect and pay interest on the principal.  That annuity will provide lump sums of money to the family at various junctures in the client’s daughters’ lives such as college and milestone birthdays, and it will pay out to the family in the form of monthly checks for standard living expenses.

This case exemplifies the impact of the age of children on the settlement of wrongful death suits, as the $21.5 million dollar result reflects the loss suffered by the client’s wife and young daughters.

Elements of a New York Wrongful Death Lawsuit

While an ordinary negligence claim is based on common law, a wrongful death claim in New York is governed by state statute.[4]  The right to bring a wrongful death claim is also protected by the New York State Constitution, which states “The right of action now existing to recover damages for injuries resulting in death, shall never be abrogated; and the amount recoverable shall not be subject to any statutory limitation.”[5]

A wrongful death claim, like any tort claim in New York, must be pled.  The essential elements for pleading a wrongful death case under New York are:

  1. The defendant either (1) committed a wrongful act or (2) wrongfully failed to perform some action he was obligated to perform, and by that action or inaction, the defendant would have been liable to the decedent for the injury had the decent not died.
  2. The defendant’s wrongful act or omission must be proven to have caused the death of the decedent, who had been born alive.
  3. There must be a “distributee”—or someone who is entitled to collect the benefits of the wrongful death suit—who suffered a pecuniary loss due to the decedent’s death; and
  4. The person bringing the wrongful death suit must be the personal representative of the decedent’s estate.[6]

Further, it is the wrongful death claimant’s obligation to prove these elements as well as plead them.

Breach of Duty in Wrongful Death Cases

As previously stated, the defendant must breach a duty that would have given rise to an action by the decedent to recover for personal injuries in order to bring a wrongful death lawsuit.[7]  This duty is broad and allows the use of the wrongful death statute in negligence claims, strict liability claims, intentional tort, and even some criminal claims.[8]

However, a wrongful death suit cannot be maintained if the deceased person upon whose death the wrongful death action is predicated does not have a viable cause of action against the defendant at the time of his or her death.  Further, the wrongful death suit is subject to any defenses that the defendant would have had against the decedent had the suit been filed by the decedent himself, including statute of limitations defenses.[9]

Damages Are Limited to Distributees’ Pecuniary Loss in Wrongful Death Cases

Distributees in a wrongful death claim can recover compensatory damages for the pecuniary loss they suffered due to the decedent’s passing.  This includes damages for the loss of services and loss of parental guidance.[10]  The ultimate question in determining whether a distributee can recover is whether the distributee’s reasonable expectancy of future assistance or support by the decedent was frustrated by the decedent’s death.[11]

Importantly, New York does not allow for parties to recover for loss of society in wrongful death cases because the New York wrongful death statute “has steadfastly restricted recovery to ‘pecuniary injuries.’”[12]  In plain English, this means that wrongful death actions can only recover for injuries that are able to be measured in money, and damages for items like grief, loss of society, affection, conjugal fellowship, and loss of consortium are unavailable to wrongful death plaintiffs.[13]

Practical Tips for Maximizing Wrongful Death Settlements

File a Survival Action: Personal Injury Claims Do Not Pass With the Decedent

New York Survival Action statute provides that no personal injury or property injury action will abate because the tortfeasor or the claimant passed away.[14]  Effectively, this means that a person who is injured, files a lawsuit against a defendant, and then dies prior to the resolution of that lawsuit may have that lawsuit continued by his or her personal representative after he or she passes.[15]  The rule applies similarly if the injured person could have filed an action prior to his death but did not do so.  As long as the action is not time-barred, the decedent’s personal representative may still file that lawsuit against the original tortfeasor.[16]

Filing a survival action allows the decedent’s representatives to recover an item of damages unavailable to a wrongful death plaintiff: damages for the decedent’s pain and suffering.[17]  As previously stated, damage awards for pain and suffering are non-pecuniary awards that are unavailable to wrongful death plaintiffs, but they are available in survival actions.  New York courts allow survival action plaintiffs to recover damages for pain and suffering if they can prove that there was a period of time in which the decedent consciously experienced pain and suffering between sustaining the injury and dying.[18]

Wrongful death plaintiffs can significantly increase their damage awards and settlement values by maintaining or filing an available survival action alongside their wrongful death claim.  By doing this, they force defendants to consider the potential value of pain and suffering damages.

Perform a Thorough Investigation of the Decedent’s Economic Life

Obviously, the value of a human life cannot be measured in dollars and cents.  The New York wrongful death statute reflects that idea and is not intended to compensate distributees for the value of the deceased person’s life.  The damages awarded under this statute compensate wrongful death plaintiffs for their pecuniary losses such as their personal loss of support or voluntary assistance, their decreased probable inheritance, and the services or parental guidance that the decedent would otherwise have provided.[19]

To that end, practitioners should endeavor to investigate the decedent’s finances, including his or her income, the assets he or she had at the time of passing, and how the decedent tended to save or spend his or her money.  Further, the relationship of the decedent with the wrongful death beneficiaries may also be important, as they cannot recover damages for that of which they had no reasonable expectation of receiving.

Effective Representation is Critical

Wrongful death cases are among the most complex cases in New York’s legal system.  The importance of retaining an experienced lawyer with knowledge of New York’s rules of civil procedure and a deep understanding of the ins-and-outs of these types of cases.  If you or a loved one is in need of skilled legal representation then contact the attorneys at Dansker & Aspromonte either at our webpage, which is linked here, or by calling them at (516) 206-6723.

Challenges & Complexities in Wrongful Death Cases

Death of a Child or Non-Wage Earner

In some instances, the decedent will be a person who either did not earn an income or a child.  Given that wrongful death claims intend to remedy pecuniary injuries to beneficiaries resulting from the decedent’s passing, this can create evidentiary issues in proving the value of that pecuniary loss.

The pecuniary loss is not immediately evident where a non-wage earner or child dies.  In those cases, it’s important to remember that one calculation regarding pecuniary injuries is the increased expenditures required to continue the services he or she provided.[20]  Further, if that person was a parent, there may be compensable losses available for loss of parental guidance.[21]

Below are two more specific ways these problems may present themselves and solutions accompanying them:

  1. Decedent Children: While the loss of a child is psychologically devastating, New York’s wrongful death statute still awards damages only for pecuniary losses. Prior to 1984, the wrongful death awards for the loss of minors were meager and sometimes limited to funeral expenses.  However, Parilis v. Feinstein changed that by holding the “calculation of pecuniary loss is a matter resting squarely within the province of the jury.”[22]  Under Parilis, proof of the child’s age, character, and physical condition as well as the circumstances of his distributees were sufficient to uphold the jury’s verdict.[23]
  2. Where the Decedent is a Homemaker: When one spouse works as a homemaker and does not earn an income, an issue of pecuniary loss is almost certain to arise. However, it is important to remember that expert testimony evidence is admissible regarding the replacement value of the homemaker’s services.[24]

The Two Levels of the Statute of Limitations in Wrongful Death Claims

For any wrongful death claimant, the statute of limitations requires them to bring their claim within two years of the date of the decedent’s death.[25]  That two-year period is strictly enforced by New York courts, regardless of the theory of liability alleged.  But there is also a second level statute of limitations consideration: the statute of limitations will bar a wrongful death claim where the decedent’s action was barred by the statute of limitations at his death.[26]

The statue of limitations pertaining to wrongful death claims—specifically that the two years begin to run two years from the date of death—can be tolled under some circumstances.  First, the statute of limitations is tolled for infancy, meaning that it is tolled until such a time that a guardian is appointed for a distributee who is a child or that child reaches the age of majority.[27]  Second, if the defendant fraudulently conceals his or her misconduct, thereby preventing the personal representative from commencing the wrongful death action within the two-year period, the statute will be tolled.[28]  Finally, New York applies the “discovery rule” to the statute of limitations, meaning that a wrongful death claim arising from exposure to harmful or toxic substances is not barred until the exposure is discovered.[29]

Conclusion

As discussed above, New York’s wrongful death statute is an abrogation of the common law that courts strictly construe, and anyone seeking to bring a wrongful death claim will be required to jump through statutory hoops.  The value of representation with substantial experience in litigating wrongful death claims cannot be overstated.

If you are in need of representation after losing a loved one due to another person’s wrongful conduct then reach out to the attorneys at Dansker & Aspromonte.  Our attorneys have years of experience handling these cases.  Their resume backed by results for our clients, and our attorneys are available to provide a free, confidential consultation to you.  Reach out either on our webpage, which is linked here, or by calling them at (516) 206-6723.

Time is of the essence when looking to file a lawsuit.  With our free consultations, there is no reason to delay making the call.

[1]  N.Y. Constitution, Art. 1, § 16.

[2]  Gonzalez v. New York City Housing Authority, 77 N.Y.2d 663 (1991).

[3]  Young v. Robertshaw Controls Co., 481 N.Y.S.2d 891 (1984).

[4]  Action by Personal Representative for Wrongful Act, Neglect, or Default Causing Death of Decedent N.Y. EPTL § 5-4.1 (2024).

[5]  N.Y. Const. Art. 1, § 16.

[6]  Chamberlain v. City of White Plains, 986 F.Supp.2d 363 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (“Finally, to state a claim for wrongful death, the decedent’s personal representative must plead: ‘(1) the death of a human being; (2) a wrongful act, neglect or default of the defendant that caused the decedent’s death; (3) the survival of distributees who suffered pecuniary loss by reason of the decedent’s death; and (4) the appointment of a personal representative of the decedent.’”).

[7]  Id.

[8]  New York Law of Torts § 15:8; Fisher v. Farrell, 183 A.D.2d 1010 (1992); Kollin v. Shaff, 79 Misc.2d 49 (1974); Sullivan v. Dunahm, 7 Am.Negl.Cas. 126 (N.Y. App. Ct. 1900).

[9]  Phelps v. Greco, 177 A.D.2d 559 (1991).

[10]  Abruzzo v. City of New York, 233 A.D.2d 278 (1996); Gonzalez v. New York City Housing Authority, 77 N.Y.2d 663 (1991).

[11]  Gonzalez v. New York City Housing Authority, 77 N.Y.2d 663 (1991).

[12]  Gonzalez v. New York City Housing Authority, 77 N.Y.2d 663 (1991).

[13]  Gonzalez v. New York City Housing Authority, 77 N.Y.2d 663 (1991).

[14]  N.Y. EPTL § 11-3.2 (2024).

[15]  Frometa v. Mar-Can Transportation Company, Inc., 148 N.Y.S.3d 613 (2021).

[16]  Stolarski v. Family Services of Westchester, Inc., 973 N.Y.S.2d 725 (2013).

[17]  Tenczar v. Milligan, 365 N.Y.S.2d 272 (1975).

[18]  Tenczar v. Milligan, 365 N.Y.S.2d 272 (1975).

[19]  Gonzalez v. New York City Housing Authority, 77 N.Y.2d 663 (1991).

[20]  Gonzalez v. New York City Housing Authority, 77 N.Y.2d 663 (1991).

[21]  Gonzalez v. New York City Housing Authority, 77 N.Y.2d 663 (1991).

[22]  Parilis v. Feinstein, 49 N.Y.2d 984 (1980).

[23]  Parilis v. Feinstein, 49 N.Y.2d 984 (1980).

[24]  De Long v. Erie County, 60 N.Y.2d 296 (1983).

[25]  Proano v. Gutman, 180 N.Y.S.3d 279 (2022)

[26]  Kelliher v. New York Cent. & H.R.R. Co., 212 N.Y. 207 (1914).

[27]  Hernandez v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., 78 N.Y.2d 687 (1991).

[28]  McIvor v. DiBenedetto, 503 N.Y.S.2d 836 (1986).

[29]  N.Y. C.P.L.R. 214-c.

Recover Your Life

Let Us Fight For You
Free & Confidential Consultation

By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request.

Unfortunately, based on your query, we are unable to assist you at this time. Our firm specializes in serious accidents and negligence cases, such as car accidents, slips and falls, construction accidents, and other accidents that require hospitalization or ongoing treatment.

Proven Record of Success

Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP has been advocating for the rights of the injured since 1986. We have the tools, resources, knowledge, and commitment to get you the best possible outcome.

Providing Answers & Solutions

Our team is committed to always being able to provide you with updates on your case and answers to your questions. This is your case and we want to be sure you are confident every step of the way.

Small Firm Dedication & Focus

Our firm is different from most firms in our area in that we are a “boutique” type firm that is small enough to give personal attention to our clients and yet experienced and powerful with a reputation as a hard-hitting litigation firm.

Innovative Legal Strategies

Each client that comes to our team gets a managing partner and trial partner dedicated to their case. We put our collective 100 years of experience behind your case to obtain the best possible outcome on your behalf.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, lo que lo dejó en coma y con graves lesiones cerebrales.
Esta contable caminaba después del trabajo en Battery Park en el paseo peatonal cuando de repente fue golpeada por una motoneta de la policía que iba a gran velocidad.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
La Sra. Y-H, pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un niño sufrió lesiones graves después de caerse mientras corría detrás de su autobús escolar y ser atropellado por las ruedas traseras. Este caso demuestra la habilidad de la firma para obtener compensación en accidentes que involucran autobuses escolares y menores.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
La Sra. Y-H era una pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, sufriendo lesiones graves, incluyendo un coma. Aunque es un caso de peatón, el incidente involucra un vehículo y demuestra la experiencia de la firma en manejar accidentes graves de tránsito.
A pesar del hecho de que este caso fue referido a Dansker & Aspromonte LLP Associates por otro abogado 17 años después de que ocurriera el accidente, se obtuvo un veredicto impresionante a través de una investigación cuidadosa y una preparación incansable.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este caso involucró a una niña de 6 años que estaba en una camioneta que fue golpeada por una ambulancia en un choque de varios autos en el Northern State Parkway en Long Island, Nueva York.
Una oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años sufrió lesiones graves mientras era pasajera en un automóvil policial en camino a una llamada de emergencia.
Un carpintero de 46 años cayó de una escalera que resbaló en el sitio de trabajo, lo que le causó lesiones significativas. Este caso ilustra la experiencia de la firma en accidentes de equipo defectuoso en entornos de construcción.
Un carpintero de 30 años cayó de una escalera en un sitio de trabajo en una tienda minorista, resultando en lesiones graves. Este caso subraya la capacidad de la firma para asegurar compensación en accidentes de caídas en proyectos de construcción.
Un inmigrante mexicano sin documentación cayó 30 pies desde un andamio en un sitio de construcción, sufriendo lesiones graves al impactar contra el cemento. Este caso demuestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas en el lugar de trabajo, comunes en la construcción.
Un trabajador de construcción sufrió fracturas en el hombro, clavícula, costillas y cadera, además de lesiones internas que requirieron múltiples cirugías. Este caso destaca la habilidad de la firma para manejar lesiones graves en el lugar de trabajo.
Baby S was born with a congenital hip dislocation which was not anyone’s fault. However, malpractice occurred when the doctors and hospital did not recognize the condition after she was born. Their failure to diagnose and properly treat the condition resulted in a slight but permanent deformity.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.
A 46-year-old carpenter was working on a straight ladder which had been leaned against the wall on a jobsite. He fell when the ladder slipped away from the wall. As a result, he suffered facial injuries and a fractured knee that required surgery. The property owner and general contractor were found to be responsible because Jian S. should have been provided with a more suitable A-frame ladder or scaffolding.
A 30-year-old carpenter who was working at a job site in a retail store fell from a ladder onto both feet. He suffered bilateral calcaneus fractures requiring multiple surgeries.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Maria, a housekeeper, was walking across Ocean Parkway in Brooklyn in the crosswalk when she was struck by a school bus and thrown over 25 feet. She sustained severe injuries, including multiple fractures. The bus driver claimed that he had a green light and was travelling at a safe speed. Unfortunately, Mrs. S. could not recall any of the facts of the accident. Our investigator combed the area for witnesses. He found a woman who lived on the sixth floor of an adjacent apartment building. Although she didn’t see the accident, she happened to look out her window and saw Maria’s body lying in the roadway down the street. Using this testimony, our accident reconstruction expert was able to prove that the bus had to be speeding to knock Maria that far from the crosswalk. The case was settled immediately after that testimony.
Our client was a married NYC Parks Department employee. On a snowy night in Staten Island, he was preparing his truck to spread salt on the roadways. He drove the spreader truck to the salt storage yard. As he waited alongside his truck, the operator of a front loader truck used to place the salt in the spreader lost control of the loading bucket. Sadly, he was struck by the bucket, suffered massive injuries and died in the hospital several hours later.
A 21-year-old developmentally disabled Chinese boy was walking with some friends after school when he stepped out into the crosswalk against the light and a City bus which was turning a little too close to the corner struck him. The young man had crippling injuries which prevented him from leaving the hospital where he died several months later. Despite the fact that eyewitnesses said the boy stepped into the street against the light, the law reduces an injured person’s share of liability in accordance with their mental capacity. At trial, it was proven through a guidance counselor from his school that he was intellectually comparable to a seven-year-old. Thereafter, the jury determined that this young man was not legally responsible for his actions and awarded 100% in his favor on the liability portion of the trial
In one of the most tragic cases this office has seen, two mothers and their four teenagers were driving to a high school swimming meet on the New York State Thruway in a van. When the driver suspected a flat tire, instead of pulling over onto the shoulder, the mother of two of the children inexplicably stopped the van in the right moving lane of traffic. Within a very short time, the driver of a tanker truck traveling at a steady 65 miles an hour who claimed not to see the stopped van, struck it at full speed, literally cutting the van in half. There were two survivors with grave injuries and four fatalities. We secured the maximum insurance that was available to cover these claims.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Un trabajador de construcción de 50 años estaba montando su bicicleta cuando cayó debido a un defecto en la carretera y sufrió pequeñas fracturas y daños cognitivos leves.
Un trabajador de mantenimiento de 31 años golpeó un sensor de presión de control de tráfico de la ciudad de Nueva York mientras montaba su bicicleta. Debido a un mal mantenimiento del sensor, el trabajador sufrió lesiones graves.
Una mujer y su novio estaban andando en bicicleta cuando entraron en un sitio de excavación sin protección en una zona completamente oscura bajo un paso elevado. La bicicleta de Rhonda cayó en un pozo y su cara se estrelló contra la carretera.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
La madre de Taylor había subido más de 50 libras durante el embarazo, estaba atrasada, y tuvo una prolongada primera y segunda etapa del parto.
Una joven madre china por primera vez resultó herida debido a la negligencia médica de los médicos y el personal de lo que entonces era el Hospital Beekman Downtown.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un guardia de seguridad resbaló en una superficie helada frente a un edificio propiedad de Metropolitan Life, lo que le causó una fractura de rodilla.
Una asistente de salud en el hogar de 56 años tropezó con un cable expuesto que se extendía desde una cabina telefónica en la plataforma del metro, resultando en una lesión que requirió un reemplazo de rodilla.
Un conductor de servicio se bajó de su vehículo para recoger dinero en el carril de un Burger King cuando cayó a través de una rejilla de alcantarillado rota, resultando en una caída de 4 pies y lesiones significativas.
Un trabajador de construcción indocumentado cayó desde un andamio a 30 pies de altura, impactando contra el cemento y sufriendo lesiones graves. Este caso muestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas graves en el trabajo, que se relacionan con incidentes de resbalones y caídas en entornos peligrosos.
Un niño de 16 años fue atropellado por un camión que estaba retrocediendo lentamente y quedó atrapado contra una pared, sufriendo una grave laceración en el bazo, que tuvo que ser removido.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
Adjudicado a la familia. Un hombre de 49 años cayó por el hueco de un ascensor cuando las puertas del ascensor se abrieron, pero la cabina del ascensor estaba en un piso superior.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este accidente ocurrió en el Bronx cuando Rafael C. estaba trabajando en un camión de saneamiento. El conductor perdió el control al girar el vehículo.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Un Oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años era una pasajera en un automóvil de la policía que iba a una llamada de emergencia.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.