New York Personal Injury Lawyers

Car Accidents Insurance Claims in New York: A Comprehensive Guide for Victims 

By Dansker & Aspromonte

Related Posts

December 5, 2024

The Complexities of No-Fault Insurance in New York

Categories

Car Accident Settlement

When car accidents happen, the prospects of obtaining fair compensation for victims often thin out. This is largely due to an insurance system filled with obstacles, frequently put in place by insurance adjusters aiming to minimize payouts and protect their company’s bottom line.

Understandably, this presents significant challenges in New York, where car accidents occur daily. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reports over 100,000 car accidents occurring in New York in 2023.[1] In pursuing compensation from insurance companies, many victims face significant hurdles, with fewer than 2,000 claims filed and an even lower percentage of successful compensations.[2]

Recently, courts have increasingly ruled in favor of victims, challenging insurance companies’ tactics of delay, denial, and underpayment. A notable case from 2002 exemplifies this trend. In that case, the victims sought Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Benefits (SUM) after a car accident, providing timely notice.

The insurer, however, focused on incomplete proof-of-claim forms, alleging non-compliance. It delayed the petition for nine months, requesting additional documentation. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the victims, finding the insurer’s notice requirements unnecessary and burdensome.[3]

When a car accident victim is unable to obtain the full damages they seek and deserve, financial difficulties can quickly follow due to out-of-pocket expenses. In such cases, victims may wonder if filing for an insurance claim was worth the effort.

The unfortunate reality is that there is a significant gap between the compensation awarded in many car accident cases and the actual impact on victims and their families. Bridging this gap requires proactive measures—ideally, with the counsel of a New York Accident Lawyer.

This post will provide an exposé into the challenges of the insurance claim process, revealing common tactics used by insurers and sharing practical tips for negotiating a car accident settlement.


1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Report (accessed October 27, 2024)

2 NYC Comptroller’s Annual Claims Report (accessed October 2024)

3 Matter of New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v Aguirre, 20 AD3d 538

Understanding Your Rights under New York Insurance Laws

In New York, car owners are required to carry an insurance policy, which includes minimum coverage for car accidents categorized as personal injuries.[4] The state’s No-Fault Law mandates that the injured party’s insurance company assumes liability for medical treatment and other costs regardless of who is at fault.

If an insurance company fails to cover car accident costs, the financial impact on victims can be severe, leading to accumulating medical expenses, repair bills, and other damages. In the most serious cases, accidents may result in death or lasting injuries, compounding financial strain and stress for families.

However, many insurance claims do yield favorable outcomes for victims, highlighting the importance of understanding New York insurance laws. Victims are entitled to compensation for basic and non-economic losses,[5] including no-fault benefits, with potential awards reaching or exceeding $50,000.

Is New York A ‘No-Fault’ Insurance State? What Does This Mean?

Yes, New York operates under a “no-fault” insurance system. Simply put, an insurance policyholder is reimbursed by their insurance company for accident-related damages, regardless of fault.

According to New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) guidelines,[6] no-fault coverage includes:

  • Reasonable and necessary medical and rehabilitation expenses
  • Up to 80% of lost earnings for up to three years
  • Up to $25 per day for additional expenses
  • A $2,000 death benefit if the accident is fatal

New York’s ‘no-fault’ status requires drivers involved in accidents, such as rear-end collisions, to use Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage for accident-related injuries, regardless of fault.[7] However, victims may pursue liability claims against other drivers if their injuries meet specific severity thresholds, necessitating proof of negligence or a safety rule violation.

New York also follows pure comparative negligence principles, allowing crash victims to seek compensation from other parties, even if they bear some responsibility. Liability is assigned proportionally, and damages are allocated accordingly.[8] In practice, this means that even if another driver is only 5% at fault, they may still be liable for 5% of the total damages.

Do Victims Have a Time Limit to File a Lawsuit?

New York state law requires all drivers to carry uninsured motorist coverage as part of their auto insurance.[9] This coverage protects you if an uninsured driver causes your injuries. However, if you lack auto insurance (e.g., you don’t own a car), you may need to file a claim directly against the at-fault driver.

After an accident, it’s crucial to begin the claims process promptly, as there are statutory deadlines for submitting insurance claims.[10] Generally, you have 30 days to file a no-fault insurance claim.

In New York, victims have a limited window to pursue legal action, known as the statute of limitations. Under §214 of the Civil Practice Law & Rules, the time frame to file a personal injury claim is generally three years from the accident date though there are shorter deadlines against certain municipal organizations such as the City of New York or other govermental entities. [11]

If the accident results in death, a wrongful death suit must be filed within the statutory limit set by the Estates, Powers & Trusts Law §5-4.1.[12] It’s worth noting that there are exceptions to these deadlines. Consulting with a car accident lawyer can help navigate these complex laws and determine your options.

Ultimately, in order to protect your rights, it is advisable to speak with an attorney as soon as possible after an accident. Missing an applicable deadline could forfeit your right to seek compensation.


4 NYC Bar – Auto Accidents

5 New York Consolidated Laws, Insurance Law – ISC § 5102

6 New York State Department of Financial Services

7 NYC Bar – Compensable Damages

8 NY CPLR § 1411

9 NYC Bar – Auto Accidents

10 NY Senate – CVP § 214

11 NY Senate – EPT § 5-4.1

How to Handle Insurance Claims After a Car Accident

Document and Report the Accident

Following a car accident, the first crucial step for the victim is to document the incident. Thoroughly gathering evidence and recording the scene is essential for supporting your insurance claim. Begin by photographing the accident scene from multiple angles, capturing vehicle damage in detail. Ensure that your documentation provides a clear view of the accident location, including intersections, road signs, and traffic lights.

Next, meticulously record all visible injuries sustained in the accident. After completing these essential tasks, exchange information with the other parties involved. Collect names, phone numbers, insurance details, vehicle information (make, model, and license plate number), and driver’s license information.

Under New York laws, reporting accidents that result in death or personal injury to the New York Department of Motor Vehicles is mandatory. Reporting is also required if the crash results in property damage valued at $1,000 or more. In these cases, you must file the Report of Motor Vehicle Accident (MV-104) form.[13] If the accident involves a fatality, you must notify the police immediately and file the MV-104. Fleeing the scene of an accident that results in death is a criminal offense in New York.

Even if there were no fatalities, it’s essential to notify your insurance provider promptly, as delays may compromise your claim. This is also an appropriate time to consult with a lawyer who has experience handling insurance claims after a car accident. By thoroughly documenting the accident, you strengthen your insurance claim and establish a solid foundation for a smoother resolution.

Why You Must Seek Medical Attention After a Car Accident

The phrase “health is wealth” takes on added significance when filing an insurance claim after a car accident. Medical expenses can escalate quickly, placing a heavy financial burden on the victim. Injuries from car accidents can range from mild concussions to severe amputations, and in the worst cases, fatalities.

Seeking immediate medical attention is essential, no matter how minor the injuries may initially seem. Some injuries, like whiplash, may not be apparent right away but can have serious health implications later on.

The core of your insurance claim lies in the extent of your injuries. This will justify the compensation you seek and why the insurance company should cover your expenses. To support this, you need concrete medical evidence. A comprehensive medical evaluation can be extremely helpful, as any injuries or bills not substantiated by medical records may be excluded from coverage by the insurance company.

When filing a personal injury claim, the insurance company or court will scrutinize your actions following the accident, particularly any delays in treatment. In New York, only individuals with “serious injuries” may pursue fault-based claims against negligent drivers. Delaying medical treatment could weaken your case, as the insurer may argue that your injuries were not serious or were unrelated to the accident. Timely medical care, on the other hand, establishes a clear link between the crash and your injuries, significantly strengthening your claim.

What to Do If an Insurance Claim Is Denied in NYC

When you file an insurance claim after an accident, an adjuster will assess the extent of injuries and determine whether to approve or deny the claim.

It’s not uncommon for claimants to experience delays or outright denials. If the insurance company denies your claim, they will provide a formal letter explaining the reasons. However, a denial doesn’t have to be the final outcome.

Victims can appeal the decision by gathering supporting evidence, such as police reports, eyewitness statements, photos, and medical records. Successfully appealing a denial requires detailed documentation of the accident and a carefully written letter challenging the denial. The letter should reference the relevant policy provisions and the reasons for the denial.

The reason for denial will influence the best approach for the appeal. Consulting with an attorney can be invaluable in reviewing your case, drafting a compelling response, and potentially overturning the denial.

The appeals process gives you the opportunity to contest a denial and potentially receive the compensation you deserve.


13 Report of Motor Vehicle Accident (MV-104)

Delay, Denial, and Underpayment Tactics by Insurance Adjusters (and How to Handle Them)

Like other businesses, insurance companies are profit-driven. They operate on a simple model—maximize premium collection and minimize payouts to policyholders.

Occasionally, due to overzealous oversight or bad-faith intentions, insurance companies adopt tactics to reduce payouts at the expense of their policyholders. These tactics generally fall into three categories: Delay, Denial, or Underpayment.

Delay Tactics

In some cases, insurance companies engage in bad-faith practices by intentionally delaying the claims process. They may repeatedly ask for documents you’ve already provided, stop responding, demand excessive information, delay sending an adjuster, or take months to process simple claims.

These delays can put financial strain on policyholders, causing some to abandon their claims or accept lower settlements out of frustration.

Blatant Denial or Misrepresentation

Another tactic is to deny legitimate claims. Insurers may give vague or unfounded reasons for denial, or misinterpret policy language. A common approach is to assert that the policy does not cover a specific injury or that the policyholder has failed to meet certain conditions, even when the evidence suggests otherwise.

Disputing Your Injuries or Claim

Insurance companies might argue that your treatment is not medically necessary, even if recommended by a healthcare provider. This tactic is designed to minimize payouts by making you believe that your injury is unrelated to the accident, allowing them to underpay what should be covered medical expenses.

Bad-Faith Investigation and Surveillance

Surveillance is another method insurers use to gather evidence against claimants. By doing so, they aim to misrepresent findings to reduce or deny claims. This invasion of privacy can create a hostile environment for claimants, who may feel discouraged from pursuing their claims.

Lowball Settlement Offers

Insurance companies often attempt to downplay your injuries, offering a low initial settlement that undervalues your claim. This offer may come before you fully understand your injuries’ long-term impact, hoping to capitalize on your lack of information.

This tactic is designed to prompt you into accepting a quick payment, thereby closing the claim and limiting your future financial recovery. Resisting initial pressure to settle allows you to fully assess injuries and damages before making a decision.

Tips for Negotiating a Car Accident Settlement with Insurance Companies

Insurance companies typically begin with low offers, expecting negotiations. Don’t rush to accept an offer before you understand your claim’s full value and have completed medical treatment.

Rejecting the first offer is common and rarely backfires, as insurers usually anticipate negotiations. Consulting with a lawyer can help you make informed decisions.

While insurance companies have vast resources, you have the right to hold out for fair compensation. Take the time to fully evaluate your injuries and their long-term costs, and don’t hesitate to seek expert advice.

Insurance adjusters expect rejection of the first offer, using it as a negotiation starting point. Unless the claim lacks merit, rejecting the initial offer typically leads to further discussions. Understanding these dynamics and standing firm can help you navigate the settlement process and achieve your desired outcome.

In a recent ruling, the New York Court of Appeals held that insurance carriers must demonstrate prejudice before denying coverage based on late notice of a Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists (SUM) claim, provided the insured gave timely accident notice.[14] This case underscores insurers’ contractual obligation to act in good faith toward their policyholders.


14 Rekemeyer v State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (2005)

How Can I Avoid Bad Faith Insurance Tactics?

Bad faith insurance occurs when an insurer intentionally tries to renege on its obligations to clients. Simple mistakes don’t necessarily qualify as bad faith, but a pattern of unethical behavior or intentional deception may.

There are ways to protect yourself from bad-faith insurance practices. First, keep detailed records of all interactions, correspondence, and claims submissions. It’s also essential to understand your policy’s terms, limitations, and exclusions. If anything is unclear, consider hiring a lawyer to help interpret the policy.

Clear communication can also help shield you from bad-faith tactics. Express your concerns and expectations early on. Many states have laws in place to protect consumers from bad-faith insurance practices, so familiarize yourself with these regulations and seek support when needed. By recognizing bad-faith tactics and taking proactive steps, policyholders can work to ensure fair treatment and protect their rights.

It’s important to note that not only insurance companies can be guilty of bad faith; occasionally, claimants attempt to exaggerate or falsify claims to secure larger settlements. In a 1959 case, for instance, the court ruled in favor of the insurance company after finding inconsistencies in the claimant’s testimony.[15]

Cases like this are, however, the exception rather than the rule, as insurance companies are often seen cutting corners themselves. In a notable 2000 case,[16] car accident victim Carmella Pinto sustained serious injuries, including a herniated disc and nerve damage. The defendant’s liability was conceded, and jury deliberations suggested a high probability that the verdict would exceed the $100,000 policy limit held by Allstate Insurance.

Despite this, Allstate initially offered only $30,000 to settle the claim. The jury ultimately awarded Pinto $350,000. After Allstate paid its policy limit of $100,000, Pinto’s legal team filed a federal lawsuit against Allstate, alleging bad faith for failing to settle within the policy limits when it was apparent that a jury might award a much higher amount.

A lower court initially granted summary judgment in favor of Allstate. However, this ruling was overturned on appeal by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, leading to a trial. Ultimately, Allstate agreed to settle for an additional $325,000, bringing the total to $425,000—far above their original policy limit.


15 Car and General Insurance Corp. v. Goldstein, 179 F. Supp. 888 (S.D.N.Y. 1959)

16 Pinto v. Allstate Insurance Company, 221 F.3d 394 (2d Cir. 2000)

Why Should I Hire a Lawyer?

When hiring legal counsel for insurance-related cases, carefully assess their success rate in similar cases. The lawyer you choose should be able to demonstrate knowledge of potential obstacles set by insurance companies and strategies to overcome them.

A good rule of thumb when hiring a lawyer is to prioritize firms with a proven track record in car accident cases, expertise in New York insurance laws, and strong negotiation skills. Dandalaw’s legal team, for example, has achieved remarkable success in car accident insurance claims, including securing a multimillion-dollar award for a six-year-old victim of an ambulance-minivan collision, despite the insurance company’s initial denial of liability.[17]

How Can I Cover Legal Costs?

Fortunately, contingency fee arrangements offer a practical option for victims who cannot afford hourly legal fees. In this type of arrangement, the lawyer is entitled to a predetermined percentage of the settlement once the case is resolved in your favor. Dandalaw offers contingency fee payment options tailored to the unique circumstances of each case.

Conclusion

After familiarizing yourself with the basic requirements for pursuing a claim, maintain detailed records of the accident to support your case, and consider hiring an attorney who can strengthen your claim with evidence and investigative expertise to help you pursue the maximum compensation under the law.

No-fault insurance in New York is designed to protect citizens’ rights, but these rights are best asserted with strong legal representation. With a qualified attorney, you can confidently claim your legal entitlements from the insurance company.

When it comes to settlements, experience is essential. You need a lawyer who understands the complexities and tactics that insurance companies might employ to limit your compensation. Have you faced difficulties with an insurance company after an accident? Consult a lawyer to negotiate a fair settlement. Share your story below or contact dandalaw.com for a free consultation.


17 Dandalaw – Car Accident Case Resulting in Serious Injuries

Recover Your Life

Let Us Fight For You
Free & Confidential Consultation

By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request.

Unfortunately, based on your query, we are unable to assist you at this time. Our firm specializes in serious accidents and negligence cases, such as car accidents, slips and falls, construction accidents, and other accidents that require hospitalization or ongoing treatment.

Proven Record of Success

Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP has been advocating for the rights of the injured since 1986. We have the tools, resources, knowledge, and commitment to get you the best possible outcome.

Providing Answers & Solutions

Our team is committed to always being able to provide you with updates on your case and answers to your questions. This is your case and we want to be sure you are confident every step of the way.

Small Firm Dedication & Focus

Our firm is different from most firms in our area in that we are a “boutique” type firm that is small enough to give personal attention to our clients and yet experienced and powerful with a reputation as a hard-hitting litigation firm.

Innovative Legal Strategies

Each client that comes to our team gets a managing partner and trial partner dedicated to their case. We put our collective 100 years of experience behind your case to obtain the best possible outcome on your behalf.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, lo que lo dejó en coma y con graves lesiones cerebrales.
Esta contable caminaba después del trabajo en Battery Park en el paseo peatonal cuando de repente fue golpeada por una motoneta de la policía que iba a gran velocidad.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
La Sra. Y-H, pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un niño sufrió lesiones graves después de caerse mientras corría detrás de su autobús escolar y ser atropellado por las ruedas traseras. Este caso demuestra la habilidad de la firma para obtener compensación en accidentes que involucran autobuses escolares y menores.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
La Sra. Y-H era una pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, sufriendo lesiones graves, incluyendo un coma. Aunque es un caso de peatón, el incidente involucra un vehículo y demuestra la experiencia de la firma en manejar accidentes graves de tránsito.
A pesar del hecho de que este caso fue referido a Dansker & Aspromonte LLP Associates por otro abogado 17 años después de que ocurriera el accidente, se obtuvo un veredicto impresionante a través de una investigación cuidadosa y una preparación incansable.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este caso involucró a una niña de 6 años que estaba en una camioneta que fue golpeada por una ambulancia en un choque de varios autos en el Northern State Parkway en Long Island, Nueva York.
Una oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años sufrió lesiones graves mientras era pasajera en un automóvil policial en camino a una llamada de emergencia.
Un carpintero de 46 años cayó de una escalera que resbaló en el sitio de trabajo, lo que le causó lesiones significativas. Este caso ilustra la experiencia de la firma en accidentes de equipo defectuoso en entornos de construcción.
Un carpintero de 30 años cayó de una escalera en un sitio de trabajo en una tienda minorista, resultando en lesiones graves. Este caso subraya la capacidad de la firma para asegurar compensación en accidentes de caídas en proyectos de construcción.
Un inmigrante mexicano sin documentación cayó 30 pies desde un andamio en un sitio de construcción, sufriendo lesiones graves al impactar contra el cemento. Este caso demuestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas en el lugar de trabajo, comunes en la construcción.
Un trabajador de construcción sufrió fracturas en el hombro, clavícula, costillas y cadera, además de lesiones internas que requirieron múltiples cirugías. Este caso destaca la habilidad de la firma para manejar lesiones graves en el lugar de trabajo.
Baby S was born with a congenital hip dislocation which was not anyone’s fault. However, malpractice occurred when the doctors and hospital did not recognize the condition after she was born. Their failure to diagnose and properly treat the condition resulted in a slight but permanent deformity.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.
A 46-year-old carpenter was working on a straight ladder which had been leaned against the wall on a jobsite. He fell when the ladder slipped away from the wall. As a result, he suffered facial injuries and a fractured knee that required surgery. The property owner and general contractor were found to be responsible because Jian S. should have been provided with a more suitable A-frame ladder or scaffolding.
A 30-year-old carpenter who was working at a job site in a retail store fell from a ladder onto both feet. He suffered bilateral calcaneus fractures requiring multiple surgeries.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Maria, a housekeeper, was walking across Ocean Parkway in Brooklyn in the crosswalk when she was struck by a school bus and thrown over 25 feet. She sustained severe injuries, including multiple fractures. The bus driver claimed that he had a green light and was travelling at a safe speed. Unfortunately, Mrs. S. could not recall any of the facts of the accident. Our investigator combed the area for witnesses. He found a woman who lived on the sixth floor of an adjacent apartment building. Although she didn’t see the accident, she happened to look out her window and saw Maria’s body lying in the roadway down the street. Using this testimony, our accident reconstruction expert was able to prove that the bus had to be speeding to knock Maria that far from the crosswalk. The case was settled immediately after that testimony.
Our client was a married NYC Parks Department employee. On a snowy night in Staten Island, he was preparing his truck to spread salt on the roadways. He drove the spreader truck to the salt storage yard. As he waited alongside his truck, the operator of a front loader truck used to place the salt in the spreader lost control of the loading bucket. Sadly, he was struck by the bucket, suffered massive injuries and died in the hospital several hours later.
A 21-year-old developmentally disabled Chinese boy was walking with some friends after school when he stepped out into the crosswalk against the light and a City bus which was turning a little too close to the corner struck him. The young man had crippling injuries which prevented him from leaving the hospital where he died several months later. Despite the fact that eyewitnesses said the boy stepped into the street against the light, the law reduces an injured person’s share of liability in accordance with their mental capacity. At trial, it was proven through a guidance counselor from his school that he was intellectually comparable to a seven-year-old. Thereafter, the jury determined that this young man was not legally responsible for his actions and awarded 100% in his favor on the liability portion of the trial
In one of the most tragic cases this office has seen, two mothers and their four teenagers were driving to a high school swimming meet on the New York State Thruway in a van. When the driver suspected a flat tire, instead of pulling over onto the shoulder, the mother of two of the children inexplicably stopped the van in the right moving lane of traffic. Within a very short time, the driver of a tanker truck traveling at a steady 65 miles an hour who claimed not to see the stopped van, struck it at full speed, literally cutting the van in half. There were two survivors with grave injuries and four fatalities. We secured the maximum insurance that was available to cover these claims.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Un trabajador de construcción de 50 años estaba montando su bicicleta cuando cayó debido a un defecto en la carretera y sufrió pequeñas fracturas y daños cognitivos leves.
Un trabajador de mantenimiento de 31 años golpeó un sensor de presión de control de tráfico de la ciudad de Nueva York mientras montaba su bicicleta. Debido a un mal mantenimiento del sensor, el trabajador sufrió lesiones graves.
Una mujer y su novio estaban andando en bicicleta cuando entraron en un sitio de excavación sin protección en una zona completamente oscura bajo un paso elevado. La bicicleta de Rhonda cayó en un pozo y su cara se estrelló contra la carretera.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
La madre de Taylor había subido más de 50 libras durante el embarazo, estaba atrasada, y tuvo una prolongada primera y segunda etapa del parto.
Una joven madre china por primera vez resultó herida debido a la negligencia médica de los médicos y el personal de lo que entonces era el Hospital Beekman Downtown.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un guardia de seguridad resbaló en una superficie helada frente a un edificio propiedad de Metropolitan Life, lo que le causó una fractura de rodilla.
Una asistente de salud en el hogar de 56 años tropezó con un cable expuesto que se extendía desde una cabina telefónica en la plataforma del metro, resultando en una lesión que requirió un reemplazo de rodilla.
Un conductor de servicio se bajó de su vehículo para recoger dinero en el carril de un Burger King cuando cayó a través de una rejilla de alcantarillado rota, resultando en una caída de 4 pies y lesiones significativas.
Un trabajador de construcción indocumentado cayó desde un andamio a 30 pies de altura, impactando contra el cemento y sufriendo lesiones graves. Este caso muestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas graves en el trabajo, que se relacionan con incidentes de resbalones y caídas en entornos peligrosos.
Un niño de 16 años fue atropellado por un camión que estaba retrocediendo lentamente y quedó atrapado contra una pared, sufriendo una grave laceración en el bazo, que tuvo que ser removido.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
Adjudicado a la familia. Un hombre de 49 años cayó por el hueco de un ascensor cuando las puertas del ascensor se abrieron, pero la cabina del ascensor estaba en un piso superior.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este accidente ocurrió en el Bronx cuando Rafael C. estaba trabajando en un camión de saneamiento. El conductor perdió el control al girar el vehículo.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Un Oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años era una pasajera en un automóvil de la policía que iba a una llamada de emergencia.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.