New York Personal Injury Lawyers

Construction Accidents in NYC

By Dansker & Aspromonte

Related Posts

January 16, 2025

Construction Accident Law: Recent Developments and Key Cases in NYC

Construction Worker NYC

Construction Accidents in NYC

The growth of the construction industry in New York City is staggering.  According to the New York City Construction Outlook Report for 2024 through 2026:

  • total construction spending is projected to increase to $65.5 billion in 2026;
  • the number of construction jobs may balloon to 160,000 jobs by the same year; and
  • the construction activity in NYC comprises 3% of all spending nationwide over the past five years.[1]

While the economic statistics are cause for celebration, there will inevitably be injuries accompanying this construction boom—particularly in the spring time.  With spring’s arrival comes unpredictable weather conditions such as ice and snow that pose significant hazards to the construction crews working these jobs.

Many of these accidents can be avoided entirely through the effective utilization of laws and regulations designed to increase safety on the jobsite and thorough safety planning.  However, not every jobsite will be effective in implementing the necessary safety plans and procedure.

When that happens, contact the construction accident attorneys at Dansker & Aspromonte to discuss your legal rights and options.  Our attorneys have years of experience litigating construction accident cases and are available to consult with you about your case at no upfront cost.  Call us today at (516) 774-3988 to schedule your initial consultation free of charge.  You can also contact us through our online portal, which is linked here.

 

Common Accidents on Construction Sites

There is a reason that construction workers are required to wear hardhats and steel-toed boots: construction jobsites are inherently dangerous.  Workers face numerous risks that can lead to serious injury or even death if they are not mitigated appropriately.  What follows are just a few of the most common risks faced by construction workers on jobsites according to the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics[2]:

  • Falls, Slips, & Trips: The risk of injuring oneself by falling is prevalent on the jobsite, with 62.2% of construction laborers being exposed to heights, and the incidence rate for nonfatal falls, slips, or trips is higher for construction workers than all other workers in the United States.
  • Struck-by Object Incidents: More than 30% of construction laborers are required to drive a motor vehicle or operate motorized equipment. Another 60% of construction laborers work in proximity to moving mechanical parts.  Ultimately, 65 construction workers were killed by contact with moving objects or equipment in 2020.
  • Exposure to Hazardous Substances: A hazardous substance is a substance that negatively affects the respiratory system, eyes, skin, or other living tissue through its inhalation, ingestion, or contact with the person. Typically, this is not a risk that construction workers are capable of mitigating, and fatalities due to these exposures reached a five-year high in 2020.
  • Exertion-Related Injuries: Construction workers are highly likely to suffer a nonfatal injury due to overexertion because the almost 93% of construction laborers are required to move heavy objects around the site.

Construction Risks

Seasonal Weather

Spring brings welcome weather for many people.  Temperatures tend to rise during the spring, but the rising temperatures often lead to more volatile or unpredictable weather.  Rain, wind, and varying temperatures can make it difficult to effectively plan for the safety needs of the day on the construction site.  These conditions increase the risk of injury on the jobsites.

Rushed Project Schedules

According to a NASA report, schedule pressure—or the induced demand perceived by people to perform their work within a given time frame—both jeopardizes the quality of the work performed and the safety of the workers performing it.[3]  The report found that workers perceiving that they must overcome schedule pressure are more prone to cutting corners—including safety corners—to meet the demands of their schedule, and schedule pressure can also lead to increased work defects.  The research suggests that too much of this pressure jeopardizes site safety.

Increased Workforce Challenges

Construction projects typically ramp up as the weather warms up, meaning that there is a greater demand for workers on the jobsite during these periods.[4]  Many of the newest workers will begin their work on the jobsite in the spring with little to no training or experience.  The lack of training and experience matters because these workers will not fully understand all of the risks they face on the jobsite.

Urban Density & Pedestrian Safety Risks

NYC’s dense urban environment presents safety risks to those working on the jobsite and even those who are near the site.  These tightly packed jobsites can leave little to no room for the workers to maneuver on the job—thereby increasing the risk of injury.

NYC Regulatory Framework

NYC enacted Local Law 196 in 2017.[5]  For the first time, construction workers and their supervisors on specific job sites were required by law to complete designated safety training courses.  Further, Local Law 196 requires workers to obtain a Site Safety Training (“SST”) card by completing 40 hours of safety training on topics such as fall prevention, scaffolding safety, and general site safety practices.

NYC Building Codes

Chapter 33 of the NYC Building Code[6] mandates safety rules and procedures for both construction and demolition sites, including:

  • obliging certain construction sites to have qualified Site Safety Managers, Coordinators, or Superintendents to ensure safety compliance;
  • mandated installation of protective structures such as guardrails, safety nets, and required utilization of personal protective equipment (“PPE”) to prevent accidents;
  • required inspections of both the equipment and the work practices on the jobsite to prevent injuries and deaths; and
  • specific requirements for safety logs or reports in order to ensure transparency and accountability.

New York State Labor Laws Protecting Workers

New York implemented Section 200, Section 240, and Section 241 to ensure New York’s construction workers are protected on the job.[7]  At bottom, these statutes demand that employers and property owners adhere to safety protocols and provide protective equipment as needed, and they impose strict liability on them for their failure to comply.  Each section will be discussed below.

Section 200: The General Duty to Protect Health and Safety

Section 200 of the New York Labor Laws establishes a general duty on employers to provide a safe working environment for their employees.[8]  The law has two key provisions.  First, the physical workplace must be constructed, equipped, arranged, and operated to provide reasonable and adequate protection to the lives, health, and safety of every person employed there.  Second, Section 200 requires all of the machinery, equipment, and devices to be well-lit, operated, and guarded to the extent necessary to provide reasonable and adequate protection of the safety of the workers.

 

Section 240: Scaffolding

Section 240—also referred to as the “Scaffold Law”—specifically addresses the hazards of working in an elevated space.  The most prominent function of the Scaffold Law is to require the contractors, owners, and their agents to furnish or erect appropriate safety devices such as scaffolding, hoists, stays, ladders, slings, iron ropes, and any other equipment to protect workers involved in the work of construction, demolition, alterations, painting, cleaning, or erection.[9]  Anyone who violates these requirements can be held strictly liable for resulting injuries.  Contributory negligence is therefore not a defense to any suit brought alleging the violation of one of Section 240’s provisions.

Section 241: Construction, Excavation, and Demolition Work

Finally, Section 241 outlines the specific safety requirements for construction sites.[10]  This section specifically mandates that areas in which construction, excavation, or demolition is to be performed must be constructed, equipped, arranged, and operated as to provide reasonable and adequate protection for the safety of the employees on that jobsite.  This section also requires compliance with the rules promulgated by the New York Commissioner of Labor.

Legal Protections for Workers & Bystanders

Personal Injury Lawsuits

A personal injury lawsuit is a lawsuit filed under New York tort law alleging that someone suffered an injury, and as a result of said injury, they are owed financial compensation.[11]  These lawsuits can be filed by any person who is looking to recover financial compensation for their injuries from a construction accident.  Further, personal injury lawsuits may allow victims to recover punitive damages where the responsible party’s conduct has a high degree of moral culpability which manifests a conscious disregard of the rights of others or conduct so reckless as to amount to such disregard.[12]

 

Workers’ Compensation

In New York, the Workers’ Compensation Law is codified in Chapter 67 of the New York Consolidated Laws.  It outlines an employees rights in any proceeding concerning a workplace injury—such as an injury occurring in a construction accident.[13]  Workers’ compensation provides benefits to employees who file lawsuits for injuries or illnesses arising out of and in the course of their employment.[14]

Workers’ compensation is intended to ensure that injured workers are paid medical benefits for the necessary and reasonable medical treatment they received for work-related injuries or illnesses.  However, only employees are entitled to file an action for workers’ compensation.  Further, workers’ compensation does not award damages for pain and suffering nor does it award punitive damages.

Legal Protections Against Employer Retaliation

Two different sections of the New York Labor laws protect workers from employer retaliation after they file lawsuits or complaints against their employers.  First, Section 215 of the New York Labor Law[15]:

  • ensures that employees can file complaints about perceived violations of labor laws to their employer, the Commissioner of Labor, the New York Attorney General, or any other person;
  • protects employees as they are about to institute or have recently instituted a legal proceeding under or related to New York’s labor laws; and
  • protects employees when they provide information or testify against their employer in any investigation or proceeding concerning the violation of New York’s labor laws.

Section 215 prohibits employers from taking retaliatory actions such as termination, threats of termination, any type of penalty, or any other form of discrimination against the employee.  If the employer does take such retaliatory action against the employee then the employee can sue the employer for compensation for lost wages and benefits, liquidated damages, or reinstatement to their former position.

The second provision—Section 740—protects whistleblowers against retaliatory actions by their employers[16].  Specifically, Section 740 protects employees who (1) disclose or threaten to disclose information about employer activities or practices that violate laws, rules or regulations; (2) testify or provide information in investigations or hearings; and (3) object or refuse to participate in activities, policies, or practices that violate the law.

NYC Construction Accident Litigation

Key Evidence in Construction Accident Cases

Construction accident litigation is often as complex as the myriad moving pieces on the actual construction site itself.  There is no one-size-fits-all in construction litigation, but there are common types of evidence used in construction accident cases.

First, photos and witness statements are important in construction accident cases just like they would be in any other case.  However, construction sites are so heavily regulated that there should be a history of documentation in the form of safety reports and OSHA violation records.  Acquiring this evidence is paramount in any successful construction accident case.

Second, the testimony of expert witnesses will be necessary in any construction accident case.  Such testimony is likely to the take the form of testimony on the standards and practices in the construction industry, generally, but there may also be testimony from engineers who understand the heavy machinery that is ever-present on the jobsite.

Statute of Limitations for Filing Construction Accident Claims

There are two statutes of limitation to keep track of in New York construction accident cases.  First, a plaintiff in a personal injury lawsuit has only three years to file his claim, and after that, he or she may not file the claim at any point in the future unless an exception to this general rule applies.[17]

Remember: under New York Law you are not permitted to sue your employer in a personal injury lawsuit.  You are only permitted to claim benefits through the New York Worker’s Compensation laws.  If you are seeking to recover through the workers’ compensation system then you will only have two years to file your workers’ compensation claim under the applicable statute of limitations.[18]

Conclusion

The construction industry is responsible for enormous economic growth in New York, but the jobs boom it has brought will inevitably result in injuries to some construction workers.  Many responsible companies work hard to implement safety procedures and keep their workers safe, but sadly, not every construction company shares this same commitment to safety and the well-being of their workers.  When faced with these companies, it is important to consider what your legal rights and options are under the New York personal injury laws and workers’ compensation laws.

Remember: you have a limited period of time to file these claims, so see a qualified construction accident attorney like ours at Dansker & Aspromonte as soon as you are able to do so.  Our attorneys bring a wealth of experience to your case and will work tirelessly to get you all of the money you are owed.  You can call us at (516) 774-3988 to schedule your free consultation, or you can contact us through our online portal, which is linked here.

[1]  “2024-2026 New York City Construction Outlook Report,” New York Building Congress (accessed 3/15/2025), https://buildingcongress.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/2024-Construction-Outlook.pdf.

[2]  Nichole Helmick & Jeremy Petosa, “Workplace Injuries and Job Requirements for Construction Laborers,” U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (November 2022), https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2022/workplace-injuries-and-job-requirements-for-construction-laborers/.

[3]  James E. Leemann, Ph.D., “Deadlines can erode safety and promote risk-taking,” Industrial Safety & Hygiene News (March 1, 2016), https://www.ishn.com/articles/103452-deadlines-can-erode-safety-and-promote-risk-taking.

[4]  “Understanding the Construction Hiring Cycle: When and Why to Start Your Job Search,” Ardith Rademacher Associates: Construction Recruiter & Staffing (accessed 3/14/2025), https://www.strathire.com/understanding-the-construction-hiring-cycle-when-and-why-to-start-your-job-search/.

[5]  NYC Local Law 196 of 2017.

[6]  NYCBC Chapter 33.

[7]  New York Labor Law § 200; New York Labor Law § 240; New York Labor Law Section 241.

[8]  New York Labor Law § 200.

[9]  New York Labor Law § 240.

[10]  New York Labor Law § 241.

[11]  L.J. V. Zhang, 212 N.Y.S.3d 789 (2024).

[12]  Chauca v. Abraham, 30 N.Y.3d 325 (2017).

[13]  New York Workers’ Compensation Law § 1.

[14]  Matter of Grover v. State Ins. Fund, 65 AD 3d 1329 (2018).

[15]  New York Labor Law § 215.

[16]  New York Labor Law § 740.

[17]  NYCPLR § 214(5).

[18]  New York Workers’ Compensation Law § 28.

Recover Your Life

Let Us Fight For You
Free & Confidential Consultation

By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request.

Unfortunately, based on your query, we are unable to assist you at this time. Our firm specializes in serious accidents and negligence cases, such as car accidents, slips and falls, construction accidents, and other accidents that require hospitalization or ongoing treatment.

Proven Record of Success

Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP has been advocating for the rights of the injured since 1986. We have the tools, resources, knowledge, and commitment to get you the best possible outcome.

Providing Answers & Solutions

Our team is committed to always being able to provide you with updates on your case and answers to your questions. This is your case and we want to be sure you are confident every step of the way.

Small Firm Dedication & Focus

Our firm is different from most firms in our area in that we are a “boutique” type firm that is small enough to give personal attention to our clients and yet experienced and powerful with a reputation as a hard-hitting litigation firm.

Innovative Legal Strategies

Each client that comes to our team gets a managing partner and trial partner dedicated to their case. We put our collective 100 years of experience behind your case to obtain the best possible outcome on your behalf.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, lo que lo dejó en coma y con graves lesiones cerebrales.
Esta contable caminaba después del trabajo en Battery Park en el paseo peatonal cuando de repente fue golpeada por una motoneta de la policía que iba a gran velocidad.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
La Sra. Y-H, pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un niño sufrió lesiones graves después de caerse mientras corría detrás de su autobús escolar y ser atropellado por las ruedas traseras. Este caso demuestra la habilidad de la firma para obtener compensación en accidentes que involucran autobuses escolares y menores.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
La Sra. Y-H era una pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, sufriendo lesiones graves, incluyendo un coma. Aunque es un caso de peatón, el incidente involucra un vehículo y demuestra la experiencia de la firma en manejar accidentes graves de tránsito.
A pesar del hecho de que este caso fue referido a Dansker & Aspromonte LLP Associates por otro abogado 17 años después de que ocurriera el accidente, se obtuvo un veredicto impresionante a través de una investigación cuidadosa y una preparación incansable.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este caso involucró a una niña de 6 años que estaba en una camioneta que fue golpeada por una ambulancia en un choque de varios autos en el Northern State Parkway en Long Island, Nueva York.
Una oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años sufrió lesiones graves mientras era pasajera en un automóvil policial en camino a una llamada de emergencia.
Un carpintero de 46 años cayó de una escalera que resbaló en el sitio de trabajo, lo que le causó lesiones significativas. Este caso ilustra la experiencia de la firma en accidentes de equipo defectuoso en entornos de construcción.
Un carpintero de 30 años cayó de una escalera en un sitio de trabajo en una tienda minorista, resultando en lesiones graves. Este caso subraya la capacidad de la firma para asegurar compensación en accidentes de caídas en proyectos de construcción.
Un inmigrante mexicano sin documentación cayó 30 pies desde un andamio en un sitio de construcción, sufriendo lesiones graves al impactar contra el cemento. Este caso demuestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas en el lugar de trabajo, comunes en la construcción.
Un trabajador de construcción sufrió fracturas en el hombro, clavícula, costillas y cadera, además de lesiones internas que requirieron múltiples cirugías. Este caso destaca la habilidad de la firma para manejar lesiones graves en el lugar de trabajo.
Baby S was born with a congenital hip dislocation which was not anyone’s fault. However, malpractice occurred when the doctors and hospital did not recognize the condition after she was born. Their failure to diagnose and properly treat the condition resulted in a slight but permanent deformity.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.
A 46-year-old carpenter was working on a straight ladder which had been leaned against the wall on a jobsite. He fell when the ladder slipped away from the wall. As a result, he suffered facial injuries and a fractured knee that required surgery. The property owner and general contractor were found to be responsible because Jian S. should have been provided with a more suitable A-frame ladder or scaffolding.
A 30-year-old carpenter who was working at a job site in a retail store fell from a ladder onto both feet. He suffered bilateral calcaneus fractures requiring multiple surgeries.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Maria, a housekeeper, was walking across Ocean Parkway in Brooklyn in the crosswalk when she was struck by a school bus and thrown over 25 feet. She sustained severe injuries, including multiple fractures. The bus driver claimed that he had a green light and was travelling at a safe speed. Unfortunately, Mrs. S. could not recall any of the facts of the accident. Our investigator combed the area for witnesses. He found a woman who lived on the sixth floor of an adjacent apartment building. Although she didn’t see the accident, she happened to look out her window and saw Maria’s body lying in the roadway down the street. Using this testimony, our accident reconstruction expert was able to prove that the bus had to be speeding to knock Maria that far from the crosswalk. The case was settled immediately after that testimony.
Our client was a married NYC Parks Department employee. On a snowy night in Staten Island, he was preparing his truck to spread salt on the roadways. He drove the spreader truck to the salt storage yard. As he waited alongside his truck, the operator of a front loader truck used to place the salt in the spreader lost control of the loading bucket. Sadly, he was struck by the bucket, suffered massive injuries and died in the hospital several hours later.
A 21-year-old developmentally disabled Chinese boy was walking with some friends after school when he stepped out into the crosswalk against the light and a City bus which was turning a little too close to the corner struck him. The young man had crippling injuries which prevented him from leaving the hospital where he died several months later. Despite the fact that eyewitnesses said the boy stepped into the street against the light, the law reduces an injured person’s share of liability in accordance with their mental capacity. At trial, it was proven through a guidance counselor from his school that he was intellectually comparable to a seven-year-old. Thereafter, the jury determined that this young man was not legally responsible for his actions and awarded 100% in his favor on the liability portion of the trial
In one of the most tragic cases this office has seen, two mothers and their four teenagers were driving to a high school swimming meet on the New York State Thruway in a van. When the driver suspected a flat tire, instead of pulling over onto the shoulder, the mother of two of the children inexplicably stopped the van in the right moving lane of traffic. Within a very short time, the driver of a tanker truck traveling at a steady 65 miles an hour who claimed not to see the stopped van, struck it at full speed, literally cutting the van in half. There were two survivors with grave injuries and four fatalities. We secured the maximum insurance that was available to cover these claims.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Un trabajador de construcción de 50 años estaba montando su bicicleta cuando cayó debido a un defecto en la carretera y sufrió pequeñas fracturas y daños cognitivos leves.
Un trabajador de mantenimiento de 31 años golpeó un sensor de presión de control de tráfico de la ciudad de Nueva York mientras montaba su bicicleta. Debido a un mal mantenimiento del sensor, el trabajador sufrió lesiones graves.
Una mujer y su novio estaban andando en bicicleta cuando entraron en un sitio de excavación sin protección en una zona completamente oscura bajo un paso elevado. La bicicleta de Rhonda cayó en un pozo y su cara se estrelló contra la carretera.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
La madre de Taylor había subido más de 50 libras durante el embarazo, estaba atrasada, y tuvo una prolongada primera y segunda etapa del parto.
Una joven madre china por primera vez resultó herida debido a la negligencia médica de los médicos y el personal de lo que entonces era el Hospital Beekman Downtown.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un guardia de seguridad resbaló en una superficie helada frente a un edificio propiedad de Metropolitan Life, lo que le causó una fractura de rodilla.
Una asistente de salud en el hogar de 56 años tropezó con un cable expuesto que se extendía desde una cabina telefónica en la plataforma del metro, resultando en una lesión que requirió un reemplazo de rodilla.
Un conductor de servicio se bajó de su vehículo para recoger dinero en el carril de un Burger King cuando cayó a través de una rejilla de alcantarillado rota, resultando en una caída de 4 pies y lesiones significativas.
Un trabajador de construcción indocumentado cayó desde un andamio a 30 pies de altura, impactando contra el cemento y sufriendo lesiones graves. Este caso muestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas graves en el trabajo, que se relacionan con incidentes de resbalones y caídas en entornos peligrosos.
Un niño de 16 años fue atropellado por un camión que estaba retrocediendo lentamente y quedó atrapado contra una pared, sufriendo una grave laceración en el bazo, que tuvo que ser removido.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
Adjudicado a la familia. Un hombre de 49 años cayó por el hueco de un ascensor cuando las puertas del ascensor se abrieron, pero la cabina del ascensor estaba en un piso superior.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este accidente ocurrió en el Bronx cuando Rafael C. estaba trabajando en un camión de saneamiento. El conductor perdió el control al girar el vehículo.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Un Oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años era una pasajera en un automóvil de la policía que iba a una llamada de emergencia.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.