New York Personal Injury Lawyers

Legal Rights & Remedies for NYC Pedestrian Accident Victims

By Dansker & Aspromonte

Related Posts

December 8, 2024

Pedestrian Safety in Urban Environments: A Legal Perspective

Categories

NYC Pedestrian Cross Walk

Know Your Rights: Legal Options for NYC Pedestrian Accident Victims

In 2014, New York City invested $110 million to preventing pedestrian accidents.[1]  Pedestrian accidents—defined as an occurrence in which a person who is walking, running, or otherwise not inside of a vehicle is struck by a vehicle—have horrific consequences for their victims.  Recognizing these consequences, New York City used that money to implement Vision Zero to prevent pedestrian accidents and their consequences.[2]  Vision Zero is a philosophical departure from prior endeavors to prevent pedestrian accidents: this program focuses on improving systems to increase safety with the expectation that human beings will make errors while driving.

Five years after the implementation of Vision Zero, New York City had another year of record low traffic fatalities, and pedestrian deaths fell 36% at targeted locations compared to the years before the implementation of Vision Zero.[3]  In that same year, both Manhattan and Staten Island recorded their lowest ever number of pedestrian deaths.[4]  But the program has done more than save lives: it also saves money by preventing people from going through the myriad problems attendant to pedestrian accidents.

This article is designed to address the costs of pedestrian accidents both to those who suffer injuries in them and to society at large.  After discussing these costs, this article will briefly discuss the impact that Vision Zero and other pedestrian safety initiatives have on pedestrian safety and the economic benefits these programs can bring to the community.  It will then go on to discuss how New York’s No-Fault Insurance Law impacts pedestrian accident cases.  Despite the progress made through these initiatives, pedestrian accidents still occur, upheaving the lives of their victims and leaving them in the lurch.  This guide will provide options to you if you or a loved one have been injured in a pedestrian accident.

 

The Personal Injury Attorneys at Dansker & Aspromonte Have a

This article was designed using authoritative sources from the New York City Department of Transportation (“NYC DOT”), research from universities across the nation, studies from the Center for Disease Control, and caselaw, statutes, and regulations from New York.  This article has been fact-checked by our attorneys at Dankser & Aspromonte using these authoritative sources, but it cannot act as a substitute for trusted legal counsel—especially in the wake of an injury caused by a pedestrian accident.

After enduring a pedestrian accident, the first order of business must be to get well and heal your injuries.  Once you are able, you should retain trusted counsel to act as your advocate and guide through the legal labyrinth that is the New York legal system.  Our attorneys at Dansker & Aspromonte have significant experience in handling pedestrian accident claims and routinely achieve excellent results for their clients.

Our attorneys routinely achieve excellent results for our clients.  For example, one of our clients was recently awarded a $10.3 million verdict for the injuries she sustained due to being struck by the rear door of a passing truck that flew open after being improperly secured by its driver.  Tragically, the client developed traumatic epilepsy that was both permanent and progressive.  Our attorneys achieved this result—despite the fact that she did not show visible signs of injury impairment at trial—by utilizing the testimony of medical experts to prove that the epilepsy was caused by the accident, permanent, and progressive.

Beyond the pedigree, our attorneys can help you to navigate the complexities of New York’s No-Fault Insurance Statute.  Our attorneys have studied the law and know how to help you achieve your best recovery, regardless of the nature of your injuries.  Our attorneys act as your most dedicated advocate and trusted counsel depending on what the situation calls for.

Results in a given case cannot be ethically guaranteed because every result is based on the facts of the given case, but this is the extent of the experience our attorneys will bring to your case.  If you or a loved one have been injured in a pedestrian accident then do not hesitate to reach out to our attorneys either by calling us at (516) 206-6723 or by reaching out to us at our online portal, which is linked here.

The Impact of Injury: Pain Isn’t the Only Price of Pedestrian Accidents

It is difficult to overstate the impact of pedestrian accidents on their victims and on the public as a whole.  In 2016 alone, more than 8,000 people visited the emergency department due to pedestrian accidents.[5]  1518 of them were hospitalized for longer periods of time.[6]  People injured in pedestrian accidents in New York City face a long road to recovery.  This process is not only physically and emotionally painful these victims, but sadly, some never fully recover from their injuries.

Meanwhile, their families are often forced to pick up the work once performed by the injured person.  However, the trauma brought by a serious pedestrian accident is more than just physical pain and emotional strain on victims and their families.  These victims and their families often face devastating financial consequences and long-term detrimental health effects.

The Financial Impact of Pedestrian Accidents

The CDC estimated that the economic cost of traumatic injuries totaled more than $4.2 trillion in the United States, including (a) $327 billion in medical care, $69 billion in work loss, and $3.8 trillion in the value of the loss of life or quality of life.[7]  The CDC has also found that the average financial cost due to medical expenses and lost time working due to unintentional injuries is approximately $15,000.[8]  This figure is likely too low because it does not account for injuries treated outside of the emergency room, and more importantly, does not consider costs for mental health treatment or costs incurred for medically necessary treatment caused by the injury that was not incurred until years later.[9]

The serious injuries wrought by pedestrian accidents can have permanent consequences for the people impacted by them.  For example, a recent study from the University of Michigan found insured people who are admitted to the hospital for traumatic injuries faced an average out-of-pocket expense of $3400, and those with high-deductible insurance faced an average of around a $5,000 expense.[10]  In that same study, people who sustained major injuries in the past eighteen months were 23% more likely to have medical debt sent to collections, and 70% of them had had larger amounts of medical debt in collections than those who had not recently sustained such a traumatic injury.[11]  Bankruptcy was twice as common for those hospitalized by a traumatic injury in the past eighteen months than for those who had not sustained such an injury.[12]  Adding further injury to financial insult, that study found an association between the financial distress caused by these injuries and worse long-term recovery in terms of physical and mental health.[13]

How Pedestrian Accidents Impact Victims’ Physical & Mental Health

According to a recent study, the severity of the injuries that occur due to pedestrian accidents is dependent upon several factors, including:

  • the speed of the vehicle;
  • which part of the body first comes into contact with the vehicle;
  • the angle of the vehicle’s impact on the body;
  • the pedestrian’s center of gravity;
  • which part of the vehicle first makes contact with the pedestrian’s body; and
  • the design of the vehicle.[14]

Generally, pedestrian accidents are categorized by the height of the impact of the motor vehicle relative to the affected pedestrian’s center of gravity.[15]  The relationship between the height of impact relative to the affected person’s center of gravity helps to explain why the injuries sustained by adults and children are often different because adults tend to be taller than children and have different centers of gravity.  Studies show that the most common injuries arising from pedestrian accidents involving adults are trauma to the head, injuries to the legs and pelvis, tibial plateau fractures, injuries to the ligaments in the knee, and traumatic brain injuries.[16]  Adults injured in pedestrian accidents are generally more likely to sustain musculoskeletal injuries than they are to sustain injuries to their head and neck.[17]

The opposite is true for children, who are more likely to face injuries to the head and neck then they are to sustain musculoskeletal injuries.  Generally, the most common injuries in children are:

  • injuries to the head & neck, which occurred in 34.6% of the injuries studied;
  • traumatic brain injuries;
  • chest and abdominal injuries;
  • musculoskeletal injuries, which occurred 22.2% of the time; and
  • injuries to the upper and lower legs leading to long-term disabilities.[18]

Adults and children victimized in pedestrian accidents tend to suffer different injuries, but they share in the severity of their injuries and their life-altering impact.

Improving Safety, Saving Money

As previously stated, a 2019 study that considered the cost of medical care, the price of lost wages, and the values of quality of life losses estimated the economic cost of human injuries was $4.2 trillion dollars.[19]  This loss of $4.2 trillion on an annual basis is a daunting figure, and implementing safety measures to prevent pedestrian accidents is significantly less expensive in both human terms and financial figures.[20]

Recent studies have shown the implementation of Vision Zero has resulted in dramatic injury reductions and savings in Medicaid expenditures.[21]  Vision Zero is a pedestrian and traffic safety program implemented by New York City utilizing a systems-based approach to reduce traffic and pedestrian injuries to zero.[22]  This systems-based approach incorporates an understanding of how human beings actually behave and seeks to address human error by implementing safe policies, enforcing those policies, and redesigning New York City streets and sidewalks.[23]  Moreso, Vision Zero uses statistical analysis to address areas facing greater problems where a disproportionate number of pedestrian injuries occur.[24]

This approach is working.[25]  A recent study found a marked decrease in pedestrian injuries per 100,00 New York City citizens after the implementation of Vizion Zero.[26]  Not only did Vision Zero keep people safe, that same study found that healthcare costs related to pedestrian injuries dropped by over $90 million since New York City implemented Vision Zero.[27]  Further, the New York City Department of Transportation has documented the economic benefits flowing from projects that improve pedestrian, cyclist, and transit rider safety in the form of increased retail sales.[28]  NYC DOT conducted a study that found that:

  • retail sales doubled in the three years following the installation of bicycle lanes and a tree-lined median at Brooklyn’s Vanderbilt Avenue; and
  • stores near the intersection of Amsterdam and St. Nicholas Avenues in Harlem saw a 48% rise in retail sales after the NYC DOT redesigned a difficult intersection to change its traffic patterns and create a new public space.[29]

Studies analyzing Complete Streets—another transportation policy and design approach requiring streets to be planned, designed, operated, and maintained to enable safe travel—found that New York City increased retail sales on 9th Avenue in Manhattan and decreased commercial vacancies in Union Square by almost 50% after redesigning targeted parts of New York City.[30]

The Rights of NYC Pedestrians Injured in Accidents

New York has what is known as a No-Fault Insurance statute (hereafter the “No-Fault Law”).[31]  This statute exists to accomplish the following:

  • remove most motor vehicle accidents from common-law tort litigation;[32]
  • ensure that injured people are promptly compensated for the losses they incurred—whether or not the accident was their fault;[33] and
  • reduce the cost of insurance premiums to motorists.[34]

The No-Fault Law requires car owners’ insurance policies to compensate anyone the car owner injures as a result of the use or operation of the vehicle in New York state—regardless of fault.[35]  These benefits are paid without considering who was at fault, meaning that insurers generally cannot avoid payment obligations by raising the defense of comparative negligence.[36]  Such a defense is ordinarily a significant barrier to recovering the medical costs after a pedestrian accident, but this law removes it entirely to make sure injured people are promptly compensated for their injuries.

The No-Fault Law distinguishes between the damages available to injured people based on whether or not the injured person sustained a “serious injury.”  Ordinarily, injured people who file a personal injury lawsuit can recover their “basic economic loss” if and only if that loss exceeds $50,000.[37]  This includes only medical expenses, lost wages, and other reasonable or necessary expenses.[38]

In cases of “serious injury,” the No-Fault Law serves to provide for non-economic losses.[39]  Victims of pedestrian accidents who suffer a “serious injury” under the No-Fault law are treated differently than those who did not suffer a serious physical injury per the No-Fault law.[40]  The No-Fault law defines the “serious physical injury threshold” to mean that a person suffers a “serious injury” if he or she suffers an injury that results in[41]:

  • death;
  • dismemberment;
  • significant disfigurement;
  • fractured bones;
  • the lost of a fetus;
  • permanent loss of the use of a bodily organ, member, function, or system;
  • permanent consequential limitation of the use of a bodily organ or member;
  • significant limitation of the use of a body function or system; or
  • a medically determined injury impairment of an non-permanent nature which prevents the injured person from performing substantially all of the material facts which constitute that person’s typical daily activities for more than ninety days during the one-hundred eighty days immediately following the occurrence of the injury or impairment.

Absent a serious injury, no recovery will be available for non-economic losses.

Our pedestrian accident attorneys at Dansker & Aspromonte provide free consultations about your case and can tell you if your injury falls under the “serious injury” category.  This article was developed using their deep understanding of the law, but it cannot act as a substitute to a consultation about your case.  Please do not delay in retaining trusted counsel, for unnecessary delay can cost your case.

Conclusion

As seen above, New York has taken action to prevent pedestrian accidents.  The injuries sustained in these accidents are serious and costly to both their victims and society.  While New York has made progress in increasing pedestrian safety, there are still many steps that can be taken to reach Vision Zero’s ultimate goal.

If you have been injured in a pedestrian accident then time is of the essence.  You should retain trusted legal counsel as soon as possible to ensure you maximize the value of your claim.  You and your loved ones can have peace of mind that your claim is in competent, skilled hands after retaining our attorneys at Dansker & Aspromonte.  Reach out by calling us at (516) 206-6723 or by reaching out to us at our online portal, which is linked here.

At Dansker & Aspromonte, we love hearing from our clients and our community.  If you have been injured in a pedestrian accident, we want to know: what challenges have you faced after a pedestrian accident?

[1]  New York Department of Transportation, Pedestrian Safety Initiatives – Taking Action on Pedestrian Safety (accessed Dec. 2024), https://www.ny.gov/programs/pedestrian-safety.

[2]  Vision Zero Network, “What is Vision Zero?” (accessed Dec. 2024), https://visionzeronetwork.org/about/what-is-vision-zero/.

[3]  Vision Zero, Year 5 Report (March 2019), https://actionvisionzero.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/nyc-vision-zero-year-5-reportmarch19.pdf.

[4]  Id.

[5]  NYC Data Portal: Environment & Health, Pedestrian Injury Emergency department visits (accessed Dec. 2024), https://a816-dohbesp.nyc.gov/IndicatorPublic/data-explorer/transportation-related-injuries/?id=2094#display=summary.

[6]  Id.

[7]  Cora Peterson, et al, Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Economic Cost of Injury – United States 2019 (Dec. 3, 2021), https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/pdfs/mm7048a1-h.pdf.

[8]  Curtis Florence, et al., Center for Disease Control and Prevention Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, “Estimated Lifetime Medical and Work-Loss Costs of Emergency Department-Treated Nonfatal Injuries – United States 2013” (October 2, 2015), https://www.cdc.gov/MMWr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6438a5.htm.

[9]  Id.

[10]  John Scott, et al., Financial Outcomes After Traumatic Injury Among Working-Ague US Adults With Commercial Insurance, JAMA Health Forum (November 11, 2022), https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/2798436.

[11]  John Scott, et al., University of Michigan: Institute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation, “Major financial pain follows major injury, U-M study shows” (Nov. 14, 2022), https://ihpi.umich.edu/news/major-financial-pain-follows-major-injury-u-m-study-shows.

[12]  Id.

[13]  Id.

[14]  Bharath Chakravarthy, et al., “Pedestrian Injuries: Emergency Care Considerations”, Cal J. Emerg. Med. (Feb. 2007), https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2859736/#:~:text=Most%20injuries%20arising%20from%20these,brain%20injuries%2C%20are%20all%20common.

[15]  Id.

[16]  Id.

[17]  Id.

[18]  Id.

[19]  Cora Peterson, et al, Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Economic Cost of Injury – United States 2019 (Dec. 3, 2021), https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/pdfs/mm7048a1-h.pdf.

[20]  Kacie L Dragan & Sherry A Glied, “Major Traffic Safety Reform and Road Traffic Injuries Among Low-Income New York Residents, 2009-2021,” American Journal of Public Health (Pub. May 8, 2024), https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307617.

[21]  Id.

[22]  Vision Zero Network, “What is Vision Zero?” (accessed Dec. 2024), https://visionzeronetwork.org/about/what-is-vision-zero/.

[23]  Id.

[24]  Id.

[25]  Kacie L Dragan & Sherry A Glied, “Major Traffic Safety Reform and Road Traffic Injuries Among Low-Income New York Residents, 2009-2021,” American Journal of Public Health (Pub. May 8, 2024), https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307617.

[26]  Id.

[27]  Id.

[28]  New York City Department of Transportation, “The Economic Benefits of Sustainable Streets,” (accessed December 2024), https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/dot-economic-benefits-of-sustainable-streets.pdf.

[29]  Id.

[30]  New York City Department of Transportation, “Measuring the Street: New Metrics for 21st Century Streets,” (2012).

[31]  See N.Y. Ins. Law § 5103.

[32]  Walton v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 88 N.Y.2d 211 (1996).

[33]  Contact Chiropractic, P.C. v. New York City Transit Authority, 31 N.Y.3d 187 (2018).

[34]  Id.

[35]  Byrne v. Oester Trucking, Inc., 386 F.Supp.2d 386 (2005).

[36]  Id.

[37]  Ventra v. U.S., 121 F.Supp.2d 326 (S.D.N.Y. 2000).

[38]  N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102(a).

[39]  Oberly v. Bangs Ambulance Inc., 96 N.Y.2d 295 (2001).

[40]  Blake v. Ford, 470 N.Y.S.2d 255 (1983).

[41]  N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102(d).

Recover Your Life

Let Us Fight For You
Free & Confidential Consultation

By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request.

Unfortunately, based on your query, we are unable to assist you at this time. Our firm specializes in serious accidents and negligence cases, such as car accidents, slips and falls, construction accidents, and other accidents that require hospitalization or ongoing treatment.

Proven Record of Success

Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP has been advocating for the rights of the injured since 1986. We have the tools, resources, knowledge, and commitment to get you the best possible outcome.

Providing Answers & Solutions

Our team is committed to always being able to provide you with updates on your case and answers to your questions. This is your case and we want to be sure you are confident every step of the way.

Small Firm Dedication & Focus

Our firm is different from most firms in our area in that we are a “boutique” type firm that is small enough to give personal attention to our clients and yet experienced and powerful with a reputation as a hard-hitting litigation firm.

Innovative Legal Strategies

Each client that comes to our team gets a managing partner and trial partner dedicated to their case. We put our collective 100 years of experience behind your case to obtain the best possible outcome on your behalf.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, lo que lo dejó en coma y con graves lesiones cerebrales.
Esta contable caminaba después del trabajo en Battery Park en el paseo peatonal cuando de repente fue golpeada por una motoneta de la policía que iba a gran velocidad.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
La Sra. Y-H, pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un niño sufrió lesiones graves después de caerse mientras corría detrás de su autobús escolar y ser atropellado por las ruedas traseras. Este caso demuestra la habilidad de la firma para obtener compensación en accidentes que involucran autobuses escolares y menores.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
La Sra. Y-H era una pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, sufriendo lesiones graves, incluyendo un coma. Aunque es un caso de peatón, el incidente involucra un vehículo y demuestra la experiencia de la firma en manejar accidentes graves de tránsito.
A pesar del hecho de que este caso fue referido a Dansker & Aspromonte LLP Associates por otro abogado 17 años después de que ocurriera el accidente, se obtuvo un veredicto impresionante a través de una investigación cuidadosa y una preparación incansable.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este caso involucró a una niña de 6 años que estaba en una camioneta que fue golpeada por una ambulancia en un choque de varios autos en el Northern State Parkway en Long Island, Nueva York.
Una oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años sufrió lesiones graves mientras era pasajera en un automóvil policial en camino a una llamada de emergencia.
Un carpintero de 46 años cayó de una escalera que resbaló en el sitio de trabajo, lo que le causó lesiones significativas. Este caso ilustra la experiencia de la firma en accidentes de equipo defectuoso en entornos de construcción.
Un carpintero de 30 años cayó de una escalera en un sitio de trabajo en una tienda minorista, resultando en lesiones graves. Este caso subraya la capacidad de la firma para asegurar compensación en accidentes de caídas en proyectos de construcción.
Un inmigrante mexicano sin documentación cayó 30 pies desde un andamio en un sitio de construcción, sufriendo lesiones graves al impactar contra el cemento. Este caso demuestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas en el lugar de trabajo, comunes en la construcción.
Un trabajador de construcción sufrió fracturas en el hombro, clavícula, costillas y cadera, además de lesiones internas que requirieron múltiples cirugías. Este caso destaca la habilidad de la firma para manejar lesiones graves en el lugar de trabajo.
Baby S was born with a congenital hip dislocation which was not anyone’s fault. However, malpractice occurred when the doctors and hospital did not recognize the condition after she was born. Their failure to diagnose and properly treat the condition resulted in a slight but permanent deformity.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.
A 46-year-old carpenter was working on a straight ladder which had been leaned against the wall on a jobsite. He fell when the ladder slipped away from the wall. As a result, he suffered facial injuries and a fractured knee that required surgery. The property owner and general contractor were found to be responsible because Jian S. should have been provided with a more suitable A-frame ladder or scaffolding.
A 30-year-old carpenter who was working at a job site in a retail store fell from a ladder onto both feet. He suffered bilateral calcaneus fractures requiring multiple surgeries.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Maria, a housekeeper, was walking across Ocean Parkway in Brooklyn in the crosswalk when she was struck by a school bus and thrown over 25 feet. She sustained severe injuries, including multiple fractures. The bus driver claimed that he had a green light and was travelling at a safe speed. Unfortunately, Mrs. S. could not recall any of the facts of the accident. Our investigator combed the area for witnesses. He found a woman who lived on the sixth floor of an adjacent apartment building. Although she didn’t see the accident, she happened to look out her window and saw Maria’s body lying in the roadway down the street. Using this testimony, our accident reconstruction expert was able to prove that the bus had to be speeding to knock Maria that far from the crosswalk. The case was settled immediately after that testimony.
Our client was a married NYC Parks Department employee. On a snowy night in Staten Island, he was preparing his truck to spread salt on the roadways. He drove the spreader truck to the salt storage yard. As he waited alongside his truck, the operator of a front loader truck used to place the salt in the spreader lost control of the loading bucket. Sadly, he was struck by the bucket, suffered massive injuries and died in the hospital several hours later.
A 21-year-old developmentally disabled Chinese boy was walking with some friends after school when he stepped out into the crosswalk against the light and a City bus which was turning a little too close to the corner struck him. The young man had crippling injuries which prevented him from leaving the hospital where he died several months later. Despite the fact that eyewitnesses said the boy stepped into the street against the light, the law reduces an injured person’s share of liability in accordance with their mental capacity. At trial, it was proven through a guidance counselor from his school that he was intellectually comparable to a seven-year-old. Thereafter, the jury determined that this young man was not legally responsible for his actions and awarded 100% in his favor on the liability portion of the trial
In one of the most tragic cases this office has seen, two mothers and their four teenagers were driving to a high school swimming meet on the New York State Thruway in a van. When the driver suspected a flat tire, instead of pulling over onto the shoulder, the mother of two of the children inexplicably stopped the van in the right moving lane of traffic. Within a very short time, the driver of a tanker truck traveling at a steady 65 miles an hour who claimed not to see the stopped van, struck it at full speed, literally cutting the van in half. There were two survivors with grave injuries and four fatalities. We secured the maximum insurance that was available to cover these claims.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Un trabajador de construcción de 50 años estaba montando su bicicleta cuando cayó debido a un defecto en la carretera y sufrió pequeñas fracturas y daños cognitivos leves.
Un trabajador de mantenimiento de 31 años golpeó un sensor de presión de control de tráfico de la ciudad de Nueva York mientras montaba su bicicleta. Debido a un mal mantenimiento del sensor, el trabajador sufrió lesiones graves.
Una mujer y su novio estaban andando en bicicleta cuando entraron en un sitio de excavación sin protección en una zona completamente oscura bajo un paso elevado. La bicicleta de Rhonda cayó en un pozo y su cara se estrelló contra la carretera.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
La madre de Taylor había subido más de 50 libras durante el embarazo, estaba atrasada, y tuvo una prolongada primera y segunda etapa del parto.
Una joven madre china por primera vez resultó herida debido a la negligencia médica de los médicos y el personal de lo que entonces era el Hospital Beekman Downtown.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un guardia de seguridad resbaló en una superficie helada frente a un edificio propiedad de Metropolitan Life, lo que le causó una fractura de rodilla.
Una asistente de salud en el hogar de 56 años tropezó con un cable expuesto que se extendía desde una cabina telefónica en la plataforma del metro, resultando en una lesión que requirió un reemplazo de rodilla.
Un conductor de servicio se bajó de su vehículo para recoger dinero en el carril de un Burger King cuando cayó a través de una rejilla de alcantarillado rota, resultando en una caída de 4 pies y lesiones significativas.
Un trabajador de construcción indocumentado cayó desde un andamio a 30 pies de altura, impactando contra el cemento y sufriendo lesiones graves. Este caso muestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas graves en el trabajo, que se relacionan con incidentes de resbalones y caídas en entornos peligrosos.
Un niño de 16 años fue atropellado por un camión que estaba retrocediendo lentamente y quedó atrapado contra una pared, sufriendo una grave laceración en el bazo, que tuvo que ser removido.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
Adjudicado a la familia. Un hombre de 49 años cayó por el hueco de un ascensor cuando las puertas del ascensor se abrieron, pero la cabina del ascensor estaba en un piso superior.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este accidente ocurrió en el Bronx cuando Rafael C. estaba trabajando en un camión de saneamiento. El conductor perdió el control al girar el vehículo.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Un Oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años era una pasajera en un automóvil de la policía que iba a una llamada de emergencia.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.