New York Personal Injury Lawyers

Understanding OSHA Regulations in NYC Construction Accident Cases

By Dansker & Aspromonte

Related Posts

December 21, 2024

Were Doctors Negligent In Treating You Or A Loved One After An accident? You May Have The Right To Sue.

OSHA Safety

Understanding OSHA Regulations in NYC Construction Accident Cases

New York City is known for many things. Its glitz, its glamor, and its grit. Its towering skyscrapers and its glistening skyline. While many New Yorkers bemoan the development that constantly changes that skyline, there is no doubt that the construction business is booming in Gotham.

In its 2023-2025 New York City Construction Outlook Report, the New York Building Congress projected that New York City construction spending would reach $83 billion in 2023, with total construction spending expected to reach $261 billion over the 2023-2025 period. The report also anticipated that construction employment would grow by nearly 19,000 new jobs over the next three years. Specifically, employment in the construction of buildings, heavy and civil engineering, and specialty trades was expected to reach 153,000 jobs in 2023, growing to pre-pandemic levels by 2025.

Meanwhile, New York City permit data shows that Brooklyn led all of the boroughs in the number of construction permits issued in the second quarter of 2023 with 2,135. Of those, 838 were for new builds, 1,186 were for major alterations that would change use, egress, or occupancy (Alt 1), and the rest were for complete demolition projects. Queens came in next with 792 job permits for new builds, 714 for major alterations, and 111 for demolition projects. They were followed by The Bronx with 412 permits for new builds, 270 permits for major alterations, and 89 for demolition; and Manhattan with 185 permits for new builds, 491 permits for major alterations, and 52 for demolition. Staten Island rounded out the field with 426 permits for new builds, 133 for major alterations, and 32 for complete demolition.

New York City construction data also shows that the total number of permits issued for all construction projects in the five boroughs increased from approximately 22,000 in the first quarter of 2000 to nearly 44,000 in the second quarter of 2017. The total number of permits issued in the five boroughs topped 40,000 in the second quarter of 2023, according to the New York City Department of Buildings.

Construction Safety and Accident Data

The 2023 New York City Construction Safety Report published by the New York City Department of Buildings highlights a significant increase in construction-related incidents and injuries. The report shows that there were 841 construction-related incidents in 2023, an increase from 752 in 2022, marking an 11.8% rise. Additionally, the number of construction-related injuries climbed to 692 in 2023, up from 554 in 2022. Despite this rise in incidents and injuries, the number of fatalities decreased, with 7 fatalities recorded in 2023, compared to 11 in 2022. This marks the lowest number of fatalities in nearly a decade. Notably, the increase in injuries reflects a broader trend following the COVID-19-related construction shutdowns, with construction injuries rising every year since 2020.

What Is The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970?

In an effort to reduce the risk of workers getting seriously hurt or killed on the job, federal lawmakers passed the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act) over 50 years ago. The law aims to protect all workers, including those in New York City, by mandating that employers ensure safe working conditions that are “free of known dangers.” The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) was created under this law to enforce safety standards and ensure compliance across various industries.

Employer Mandates Under The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970

Specifically, employers must:

  • Comply with standards, rules, and regulations issued under the OSH Act.
  • Examine workplace conditions to ensure they conform to applicable OSHA standards.
  • Ensure that employees have and use safe tools and equipment, and properly maintain this equipment.
  • Use color codes, posters, labels, or signs to warn employees of potential hazards.
  • Establish or update operating procedures and communicate them so that employees follow safety and health requirements.
  • Provide safety training in a language and vocabulary workers can understand.
  • Provide medical examinations and training when required by OSHA standards.
  • Post the OSHA poster (or the state-plan equivalent) in a prominent location to inform employees of their rights and responsibilities.
  • Report to the nearest OSHA office all work-related fatalities within 8 hours and all work-related inpatient hospitalizations, amputations, and eye losses within 24 hours.
  • Maintain records of work-related injuries and illnesses. (Note: Employers with 10 or fewer employees and certain low-hazard industries may be exempt from this requirement.)

These responsibilities are part of ensuring that employees work in a safe and compliant environment. For the full list of employer responsibilities, visit the OSHA Employer Responsibilities page.

Workers’ Rights Under The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970

In addition to detailing employers’ responsibilities, the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 grants employees specific rights designed to safeguard their well-being at work. These include:

  • The right to request workplace inspections by OSHA inspectors.
  • The right to request inspections and exercise other privileges without fear of retaliation, protected under OSHA’s whistleblower laws.
  • The right to receive information and training about hazards, methods to prevent harm, and the OSHA standards that apply to their workplace.
  • The right to obtain copies of test results conducted to identify hazards in the workplace.
  • The right to review records of work-related injuries and illnesses.
  • The right to access their own medical records.

For more information on workers’ rights, visit the OSHA Workers’ Rights page.

What Is OSHA?

The **Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970** created the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). OSHA is the federal agency responsible for establishing, enforcing, and promoting workplace safety standards across the United States, including New York City. It is tasked with providing appropriate information, training, and support to both workers and employers. OSHA’s primary mission is to ensure that employers comply with safety standards and create safer working environments for employees, helping to reduce injuries and fatalities in the workplace.

OSHA standards cover all aspects of workplace safety, particularly in the construction industry. For example, Standard 1926.20(b)(3) prohibits the use of any machinery, tool, material, or equipment that does not comply with safety and health provisions. Another example is Standard 1926.28(a), which requires employers to mandate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) whenever workers are exposed to hazardous conditions or where safety provisions indicate its necessity.

Additional OSHA standards apply to various construction activities, including welding, cutting, electrical work, excavations, and steel erection. These regulations are designed to protect workers from the specific risks associated with these tasks. OSHA enforces these standards through inspections and penalties for non-compliance.

It’s important to note that while OSHA operates at the federal level, some states, including New York, have OSHA-approved state plans that cover public sector workers. However, private sector workers remain under the jurisdiction of federal OSHA standards.

A complete list of applicable standards and regulations can be found on OSHA’s website.

Understanding The OSHA Inspection Process In New York City

OSHA has jurisdiction over approximately 7 million worksites across the United States. Accordingly, the agency prioritizes inspections based on the severity of hazards. The highest priority is given to worksites where there is imminent danger of death or serious injury. Worksites where severe injuries or illnesses have occurred are inspected next. Cases based on workers’ complaints are also given high priority. Referrals made by other organizations, agencies, or media are next in line, followed by targeted inspections of high-hazard industries and finally follow-up inspections to ensure hazards cited in previous inspections have been corrected.

On-Site Inspection Process

The on-site inspection process involves several steps. First, the compliance officer prepares for the inspection by conducting research, reviewing the worksite’s history, and gathering necessary personal protective equipment (PPE).

On the scheduled inspection date, the compliance officer presents their credentials and meets with the employer to explain the purpose of the visit. The employer may designate a representative to accompany the officer, and an employee representative may also be present. The compliance officer will then conduct a walkaround to check for hazards, review records, and ensure compliance with OSHA standards, including the proper posting of the OSHA notice. The officer may also interview workers during the inspection.

When an inspector finds violations of OSHA standards or serious hazards, OSHA may issue citations and fines. OSHA must issue a citation and proposed penalty within six months of the violation’s occurrence. Citations describe the OSHA requirements allegedly violated, list any proposed penalties, and provide a deadline for correcting the hazards. Violations are categorized as willful, serious, other-than-serious, de minimis, failure to abate, and repeated. More details can be found on the OSHA Inspections Factsheet.

Steps After the On-Site Inspection

After the inspection, the compliance officer may alert the employer to any issues that can be corrected immediately. The officer will also point out other hazards or violations found. Afterward, the officer will meet with the employer to discuss the results and explain what’s next.

If OSHA issues a citation, the employer can attend an informal conference with the OSHA Area Director. During the conference, both parties can discuss citations, penalties, abatement dates, or any other relevant information. At this stage, employers may also negotiate a settlement agreement to resolve the matter and correct the hazards.

Penalties Issued in Recent New York City Construction Accident

According to OSHA’s Inspection Detail, a Brooklyn concrete company is currently contesting penalties assessed by the agency in connection with a fatal construction accident that happened on February 2, 2024. The incident occurred when a 35-year-old man working for the company was “removing dirt in the basement level of a commercial building,” and a partial collapse occurred. Falling material struck and killed the worker, according to the Inspection Detail.

Based on its inspection, OSHA found that the concrete company had committed one serious and two willful violations of relevant health and safety standards. Specifically, OSHA found that the employer did not have a “competent person” inspect the excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems before work started and as needed throughout the shift. OSHA also found that the employer “did not ensure the stability of adjoining walls and structures was not endangered by excavation operations,” and that “the employer did not provide any bracing, shoring, or support when removing the soil.” Lastly, OSHA found that “the employer did not ensure that structural stability was maintained at all times.”

OSHA assessed penalties totaling $135,510 in this case.

Penalties Issued in Recent New York City Construction Accident

According to OSHA’s Inspection Detail, a Brooklyn concrete company is currently contesting penalties assessed by the agency in connection with a fatal construction accident that occurred on February 2, 2024. The incident took place when a 35-year-old man working for the company was “removing dirt in the basement level of a commercial building,” and a partial collapse ensued. Falling material tragically struck and killed the worker, according to the Inspection Detail.

Following its inspection, OSHA determined that the concrete company had committed one serious and two willful violations of safety standards. Specifically, OSHA found that the employer did not have a “competent person” inspect the excavation, adjacent areas, and protective systems before and during the shift, as required. Additionally, OSHA noted that the employer “did not ensure the stability of adjoining walls and structures” during the excavation and failed to provide adequate bracing, shoring, or support when removing the soil. Lastly, the company “did not maintain structural stability” at all times during the project.

As a result, OSHA assessed penalties totaling $135,510 for these violations. The company is currently contesting these penalties. More information can be found in the official Construction Safety Report.

Contact Experienced New York City Construction Accident Attorneys Today

If you were injured in a New York City construction accident and suspect it stemmed from your employer’s violation of OSHA standards, you have the right to file a complaint with OSHA. You can do so online, by phone, by mail, or in person at your local OSHA office. You may file anonymously or have someone file the complaint for you. Be sure to include your employer’s name and contact information. Keep in mind that the complaint must be filed within six months of the incident, as OSHA generally cannot issue citations for violations that occurred more than six months prior.

Given the complexity of these cases, it is also important to discuss your legal options with a knowledgeable New York City construction accident lawyer. Don’t leave anything to chance—contact us today.

For more information on filing a complaint, visit the OSHA Workers’ Complaint page or learn more about the process from LawHelpNY.

Recover Your Life

Let Us Fight For You
Free & Confidential Consultation

By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request.

Unfortunately, based on your query, we are unable to assist you at this time. Our firm specializes in serious accidents and negligence cases, such as car accidents, slips and falls, construction accidents, and other accidents that require hospitalization or ongoing treatment.

Proven Record of Success

Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP has been advocating for the rights of the injured since 1986. We have the tools, resources, knowledge, and commitment to get you the best possible outcome.

Providing Answers & Solutions

Our team is committed to always being able to provide you with updates on your case and answers to your questions. This is your case and we want to be sure you are confident every step of the way.

Small Firm Dedication & Focus

Our firm is different from most firms in our area in that we are a “boutique” type firm that is small enough to give personal attention to our clients and yet experienced and powerful with a reputation as a hard-hitting litigation firm.

Innovative Legal Strategies

Each client that comes to our team gets a managing partner and trial partner dedicated to their case. We put our collective 100 years of experience behind your case to obtain the best possible outcome on your behalf.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, lo que lo dejó en coma y con graves lesiones cerebrales.
Esta contable caminaba después del trabajo en Battery Park en el paseo peatonal cuando de repente fue golpeada por una motoneta de la policía que iba a gran velocidad.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
La Sra. Y-H, pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un niño sufrió lesiones graves después de caerse mientras corría detrás de su autobús escolar y ser atropellado por las ruedas traseras. Este caso demuestra la habilidad de la firma para obtener compensación en accidentes que involucran autobuses escolares y menores.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
La Sra. Y-H era una pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, sufriendo lesiones graves, incluyendo un coma. Aunque es un caso de peatón, el incidente involucra un vehículo y demuestra la experiencia de la firma en manejar accidentes graves de tránsito.
A pesar del hecho de que este caso fue referido a Dansker & Aspromonte LLP Associates por otro abogado 17 años después de que ocurriera el accidente, se obtuvo un veredicto impresionante a través de una investigación cuidadosa y una preparación incansable.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este caso involucró a una niña de 6 años que estaba en una camioneta que fue golpeada por una ambulancia en un choque de varios autos en el Northern State Parkway en Long Island, Nueva York.
Una oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años sufrió lesiones graves mientras era pasajera en un automóvil policial en camino a una llamada de emergencia.
Un carpintero de 46 años cayó de una escalera que resbaló en el sitio de trabajo, lo que le causó lesiones significativas. Este caso ilustra la experiencia de la firma en accidentes de equipo defectuoso en entornos de construcción.
Un carpintero de 30 años cayó de una escalera en un sitio de trabajo en una tienda minorista, resultando en lesiones graves. Este caso subraya la capacidad de la firma para asegurar compensación en accidentes de caídas en proyectos de construcción.
Un inmigrante mexicano sin documentación cayó 30 pies desde un andamio en un sitio de construcción, sufriendo lesiones graves al impactar contra el cemento. Este caso demuestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas en el lugar de trabajo, comunes en la construcción.
Un trabajador de construcción sufrió fracturas en el hombro, clavícula, costillas y cadera, además de lesiones internas que requirieron múltiples cirugías. Este caso destaca la habilidad de la firma para manejar lesiones graves en el lugar de trabajo.
Baby S was born with a congenital hip dislocation which was not anyone’s fault. However, malpractice occurred when the doctors and hospital did not recognize the condition after she was born. Their failure to diagnose and properly treat the condition resulted in a slight but permanent deformity.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.
A 46-year-old carpenter was working on a straight ladder which had been leaned against the wall on a jobsite. He fell when the ladder slipped away from the wall. As a result, he suffered facial injuries and a fractured knee that required surgery. The property owner and general contractor were found to be responsible because Jian S. should have been provided with a more suitable A-frame ladder or scaffolding.
A 30-year-old carpenter who was working at a job site in a retail store fell from a ladder onto both feet. He suffered bilateral calcaneus fractures requiring multiple surgeries.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Maria, a housekeeper, was walking across Ocean Parkway in Brooklyn in the crosswalk when she was struck by a school bus and thrown over 25 feet. She sustained severe injuries, including multiple fractures. The bus driver claimed that he had a green light and was travelling at a safe speed. Unfortunately, Mrs. S. could not recall any of the facts of the accident. Our investigator combed the area for witnesses. He found a woman who lived on the sixth floor of an adjacent apartment building. Although she didn’t see the accident, she happened to look out her window and saw Maria’s body lying in the roadway down the street. Using this testimony, our accident reconstruction expert was able to prove that the bus had to be speeding to knock Maria that far from the crosswalk. The case was settled immediately after that testimony.
Our client was a married NYC Parks Department employee. On a snowy night in Staten Island, he was preparing his truck to spread salt on the roadways. He drove the spreader truck to the salt storage yard. As he waited alongside his truck, the operator of a front loader truck used to place the salt in the spreader lost control of the loading bucket. Sadly, he was struck by the bucket, suffered massive injuries and died in the hospital several hours later.
A 21-year-old developmentally disabled Chinese boy was walking with some friends after school when he stepped out into the crosswalk against the light and a City bus which was turning a little too close to the corner struck him. The young man had crippling injuries which prevented him from leaving the hospital where he died several months later. Despite the fact that eyewitnesses said the boy stepped into the street against the light, the law reduces an injured person’s share of liability in accordance with their mental capacity. At trial, it was proven through a guidance counselor from his school that he was intellectually comparable to a seven-year-old. Thereafter, the jury determined that this young man was not legally responsible for his actions and awarded 100% in his favor on the liability portion of the trial
In one of the most tragic cases this office has seen, two mothers and their four teenagers were driving to a high school swimming meet on the New York State Thruway in a van. When the driver suspected a flat tire, instead of pulling over onto the shoulder, the mother of two of the children inexplicably stopped the van in the right moving lane of traffic. Within a very short time, the driver of a tanker truck traveling at a steady 65 miles an hour who claimed not to see the stopped van, struck it at full speed, literally cutting the van in half. There were two survivors with grave injuries and four fatalities. We secured the maximum insurance that was available to cover these claims.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Un trabajador de construcción de 50 años estaba montando su bicicleta cuando cayó debido a un defecto en la carretera y sufrió pequeñas fracturas y daños cognitivos leves.
Un trabajador de mantenimiento de 31 años golpeó un sensor de presión de control de tráfico de la ciudad de Nueva York mientras montaba su bicicleta. Debido a un mal mantenimiento del sensor, el trabajador sufrió lesiones graves.
Una mujer y su novio estaban andando en bicicleta cuando entraron en un sitio de excavación sin protección en una zona completamente oscura bajo un paso elevado. La bicicleta de Rhonda cayó en un pozo y su cara se estrelló contra la carretera.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
La madre de Taylor había subido más de 50 libras durante el embarazo, estaba atrasada, y tuvo una prolongada primera y segunda etapa del parto.
Una joven madre china por primera vez resultó herida debido a la negligencia médica de los médicos y el personal de lo que entonces era el Hospital Beekman Downtown.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un guardia de seguridad resbaló en una superficie helada frente a un edificio propiedad de Metropolitan Life, lo que le causó una fractura de rodilla.
Una asistente de salud en el hogar de 56 años tropezó con un cable expuesto que se extendía desde una cabina telefónica en la plataforma del metro, resultando en una lesión que requirió un reemplazo de rodilla.
Un conductor de servicio se bajó de su vehículo para recoger dinero en el carril de un Burger King cuando cayó a través de una rejilla de alcantarillado rota, resultando en una caída de 4 pies y lesiones significativas.
Un trabajador de construcción indocumentado cayó desde un andamio a 30 pies de altura, impactando contra el cemento y sufriendo lesiones graves. Este caso muestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas graves en el trabajo, que se relacionan con incidentes de resbalones y caídas en entornos peligrosos.
Un niño de 16 años fue atropellado por un camión que estaba retrocediendo lentamente y quedó atrapado contra una pared, sufriendo una grave laceración en el bazo, que tuvo que ser removido.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
Adjudicado a la familia. Un hombre de 49 años cayó por el hueco de un ascensor cuando las puertas del ascensor se abrieron, pero la cabina del ascensor estaba en un piso superior.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este accidente ocurrió en el Bronx cuando Rafael C. estaba trabajando en un camión de saneamiento. El conductor perdió el control al girar el vehículo.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Un Oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años era una pasajera en un automóvil de la policía que iba a una llamada de emergencia.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.