New York Personal Injury Lawyers

Grieving Families Call on New York State

By Dansker & Aspromonte

Related Posts

December 3, 2024

Maximizing Wrongful Death Settlements in New York: Insights from a $21.5 Million Case

Categories

Grieving Family

Grieving Families Call on New York State

In a study conducted by New York Life, more than 2/3 of teaches reported that they either “always” or usually saw withdrawal, difficulty concentrating, absenteeism, and a decrease in academic performance in students who have lost either a parent or a sibling.[1]  When the children themselves were surveyed, many said support from family and friends waned within three months of losing their parent, but it took them more than six years to move forward.[2]

People who are in bereavement suffer many difficult symptoms, and they have to deal with these symptoms while engaging with a legal system that is unequipped to provide resources to them or their children after their losses.  In seeking to pass The Grieving Families Act, advocates are trying to reform the inadequacies of New York’s current wrongful death law.

Understanding New York’s Wrongful Death Law

In its current form, New York’s wrongful death law is a statutory act that allows a deceased person’s personal representative to bring an action for wrongful death if he pleads and proves (1) that a human being died; (2) that a wrongful act by or the neglect of the defendant caused the decedent’s death; (3) there are distributees who both survived the decedent and suffered a pecuniary loss by reason of his death; and (4) a personal representative of the decedent must be appointed.[3]  In plain English, this allows the estate of a person who was killed by another person’s wrongful act to maintain an action for wrongful death against the bad actor as long as the deceased person would have been able to maintain an action against the bad actor had the decedent not passed away.

New York’s wrongful death currently limits the available damages to compensatory damages awarded to distributees for the pecuniary loss that they suffered due to the decedent’s passing.[4]  This would allow for damages to compensate the distributee for his loss of support by the decedent and other injuries that can be measured in money, but it prohibits awarding damages for things like grief, loss of society, affection, conjugal fellowship, and loss of consortium.[5]  New York’s wrongful death law further prohibits awards of damage for the pain and suffering of the decedent.[6]

Currently, New York joins Alabama on the lonely list of states that limit recovery in wrongful death actions to economic damages.[7]  Alabama is still more restrictive than New York, for Alabama’s wrongful death statute only awards punitive damages.[8]  In Alabama, damages for wrongful death actions are not intended to compensate for the life taken nor do they consider the pecuniary loss to the claimants or their mental suffering.[9]

New York law also limits the people eligible to bring a claim for wrongful death.  Currently, only a child, parent, spouse, or the personal representative of the decedent’s estate can bring a wrongful death action.[10]

There is currently a nationwide trend towards the legislative expansion of wrongful death statutes across the United States.[11]

The Grieving Families Act: Proposed Reforms

The Grieving Families Act (the “Act”) is a piece of reform legislation intended to overhaul New York’s wrongful death system.[12]  The Act would expand both the damages that a wrongful death claimant can recover to include damages for non-economic considerations such as grief, anguish, loss of love, society, protection, comfort, companionship, and consortium.[13]  It would also expand the class of people who may seek to bring a wrongful death claim by allowing a decedent’s extended family members—such as siblings, grandparents, or cousins—to bring a claim.[14]

Ultimately, the Act recognizes that the current New York law effectively measures the value of a human life in terms of its economic production without any concern for the grief and emotional loss of the deceased person’s loved ones.[15]  The bill’s proponents further argue that it is unjust for lower-income people, many of whom are people of color, to receive substantially less in wrongful death actions by measuring the value of the claim only by the pecuniary loss infliected.

The Act has passed the New York legislature three times.  New York Governor Kathy Hochul vetoed the Act in 2022 and then vetoed a revised bill in 2023.[16]  It is expected that Governor Hochul will veto the 2024 version of the bill as well.[17]

Proponents of the Act argue that the current wrongful death statute results in discriminatory results for low-income people and those who have non-traditional family structures by providing financial relief based only on the decedent’s income/earnings.[18]  They go on to argue that the changes proposed by the Act allow non-financial contributions to be considered when assessing the value of the decedent’s life and the grief of the survivors, which would be significant for low-income households, retirees, and children who cannot contribute to the home financially.[19]

New York’s business leaders have opposed the Act based on studies from the New York Civil Justice Institute and the Empire State Chapter of Associated Builders and Contractors finding that the change would (1) increase the cost of medical professional liability insurance by 40%, (2) increase automotive insurance premiums by a total of $2.2 billion, and (3) would result in a 12% increase in annual premiums across the board.[20]  They argue this would be especially disastrous in a state like New York, where tax rates are comparatively higher than other states.

Governor Hochul, whose veto has killed two prior versions of the bill, has acknowledged that the legislation is well-intentioned, but she is unlikely to sign the third iteration of it.  Governor Hochul has expressed a willingness to compromise on a bill that would help family members who are harmed by the death of family members, but her concerns appear to be based on maintaining a sense of legal certainty as to who the proper beneficiaries would be in a wrongful death claim.[21]  Governor Hochul is also opposed to the bill on the grounds that it would increase insurance premiums and because it is vague In Its terminology, which could result in bedrock principles of the law being upended.[22]

The Human Cost of Injustice: Stories from Grieving Families

The current wrongful death law excludes people like Mr. Kurt Kiess.[23]  Mr. Kiess’s son passed away in an automotive crash where a drunk driver crashed into the Uber his son was taking.  Mr. Kiess’s son was not married, nor did he have children, and Mr. Kiess did not suffer a financial loss due to the death of his son.  Without suffering a financial loss, Mr. Kiess cannot bring a wrongful death claim on behalf of his deceased son beyond a claim for his son’s conscious pain and suffering before he died.

Ms. Shawnee Benton-Gibson is another person who has been affected by the inadequacies of the current New York law.[24]  Ms. Benton-Gibson’s daughter—Ms. Shamony Makeba Gibson—was a thirty-year-old woman who died in October 2019 after giving birth to her son two weeks earlier.  Her ability to file a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of her daughter was frustrated by the pandemic.  Ms. Benton-Gibson believes that her daughter’s death was preventable, and now her daughter left two children behind.

Mr. Leszek Wiszowaty is another person left underserved by the current state of the law.[25]  Mr. Wiszowaty lost his eighteen-year-old son Matthew at Rockaway Beach in August of 2021.  Mr. Wiszowaty is suing the City of New York and its Department of Parks & Rec for failing to adequately staff lifeguards in the dangerously turbulent waters of Rockaway Beach.

Legal and Social Implications of Reform

The Act, now in its third iteration, poses several issues of legal significance.  The most recent version of the Act has a provision that would apply it retroactively to any cause of action accruing since July 1, 2018.[26]  Such a measure of is of dubious constitutionality, for it is undoubtedly prejudicial to defendants and their insurance carriers because the policies issued by the insurers to the defendants were formulated based on the law as it existed at the time.[27]  This means both (1) that the defendant is likely underinsured for the current risk and (2) the agreed upon premiums, which were based on the law as it existed at the time, are likely to be inadequate to cover the risk.[28]

Enacting this law to apply retroactively would expand the number of claimants and increase the recoverable damage, thereby increasing the risk exponentially.[29]  Governor Hochul has indicated that she would be amenable to signing a bill without the retroactivity provision.

But there is another issue: the bill contains a lot of vague language and procedures that need to be defined.[30]  The current bill states that a “close family member” could be eligible for compensation without defining the term “close family member.”[31]  This could result in a large group of people vying for estate damages, even if they have only a distant emotional connection to the deceased person.  Such a scenario would frustrate the entire purpose of expanding the statute and increase the time-consuming and costly discovery necessary to identify claimants.[32]  Further, the bill is silent on who is obligated to identify and notify potential claimants and does not identify how competing claims would be adjudicated.[33]

How to Get Involved in Advocacy

The Grieving Families Coalition is a New York-based advocacy group whose mission statement says they are “committed to ensuring that when loved ones are lost in senseless and tragic accidents, the state recognizes the emotional suffering of those who loved them most.”[34]  The Grieving Families Coalition is seeking help in fulfilling its mission of passing the Act by directly emailing Governor Hochul in an effort to persuade her.  If you would like to learn more about the Grieving Families Coalition then you can find their website linked here.

Conclusion

Lawyers—especially those litigating wrongful death cases and other personal injury cases—have a responsibility to advocate for public safety and for equality in the eyes of the law.  Citizens are not equal under New York’s wrongful death statute as it is currently written because the only damage awards available to them are entirely contingent upon the decedent’s financial status.  Sadly, that economic tether disproportionately harms people of color as well.

At Dansker & Aspromonte, our attorneys believe that all of our clients are entitled to equal treatment under the law.  That and the pursuit of justice on their behalf animates everything our attorneys do.  If one of your loved ones has been killed by another person’s negligent behavior then call us at (516) 206-6723 or by contacting us at our webpage, which is linked here.

[1]  Childhood grief: a pervasive problem, New York Life, https://www.newyorklife.com/assets/foundation/docs/pdfs/childhood-grief.pdf.

[2]  Childhood grief: a pervasive problem, New York Life, https://www.newyorklife.com/assets/foundation/docs/pdfs/childhood-grief.pdf.

[3]  Action by Personal Representative for Wrongful Act, Neglect, or Default Causing Death of Decedent N.Y. EPTL § 5-4.1 (2024); Chamberlain v. City of White Plains, 986 F.Supp.2d 363 (S.D.N.Y. 2013).

[4]  Abruzzo v. City of New York, 233 A.D.2d 278 (1996); Gonzalez v. New York City Housing Authority, 77 N.Y.2d 663 (1991).

[5]  Gonzalez v. New York City Housing Authority, 77 N.Y.2d 663 (1991).

[6]  Tenczar v. Milligan, 365 N.Y.S.2d 272 (1975).

[7]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[8]   Bonner v. Williams, 370 F.2d 301 (5th Cir. 1966).

[9]   Bonner v. Williams, 370 F.2d 301 (5th Cir. 1966).

[10]  Action by Personal Representative for Wrongful Act, Neglect, or Default Causing Death of Decedent N.Y. EPTL § 5-4.1 (2024).

[11]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[12]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[13]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[14]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[15]  https://hopefornyfamilies.com/#:~:text=The%20Grieving%20Families%20Coalition%20is,those%20who%20loved%20them%20most.

[16]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[17]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[18]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[19]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[20]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[21]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[22]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[23]  Lewis, Rebecca, “Amended again, Grieving Families Act set to pass and seek Hochul’s approval,” City & State New York (June 4, 2024), https://www.cityandstateny.com/policy/2024/06/amended-again-grieving-families-act-set-pass-and-seek-hochuls-approval/397114/.

[24]  Blau, Reuven, “Grieving Families Act Supporters Hope Third Time’s the Charm for Beleaguered Bill,” The City (June 3, 2024), https://www.thecity.nyc/2024/06/03/grieving-families-act-third-time-vetoed-bill/.

[25]  Blau, Reuven, “Grieving Families Act Supporters Hope Third Time’s the Charm for Beleaguered Bill,” The City (June 3, 2024), https://www.thecity.nyc/2024/06/03/grieving-families-act-third-time-vetoed-bill/.

[26]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[27]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[28]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[29]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[30]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[31]  Id.

[32]  Midgley & Potenza, The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery, Best Lawyers (May 20, 2024), https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/new-york-wrongful-death-recovery-expansion/5859.

[33]  Id.

[34]  Hope for NY Families (accessed 9/11/2024), https://hopefornyfamilies.com/#:~:text=The%20Grieving%20Families%20Coalition%20is,those%20who%20loved%20them%20most.

Recover Your Life

Let Us Fight For You
Free & Confidential Consultation

By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request.

Unfortunately, based on your query, we are unable to assist you at this time. Our firm specializes in serious accidents and negligence cases, such as car accidents, slips and falls, construction accidents, and other accidents that require hospitalization or ongoing treatment.

Proven Record of Success

Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP has been advocating for the rights of the injured since 1986. We have the tools, resources, knowledge, and commitment to get you the best possible outcome.

Providing Answers & Solutions

Our team is committed to always being able to provide you with updates on your case and answers to your questions. This is your case and we want to be sure you are confident every step of the way.

Small Firm Dedication & Focus

Our firm is different from most firms in our area in that we are a “boutique” type firm that is small enough to give personal attention to our clients and yet experienced and powerful with a reputation as a hard-hitting litigation firm.

Innovative Legal Strategies

Each client that comes to our team gets a managing partner and trial partner dedicated to their case. We put our collective 100 years of experience behind your case to obtain the best possible outcome on your behalf.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, lo que lo dejó en coma y con graves lesiones cerebrales.
Esta contable caminaba después del trabajo en Battery Park en el paseo peatonal cuando de repente fue golpeada por una motoneta de la policía que iba a gran velocidad.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
La Sra. Y-H, pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un niño sufrió lesiones graves después de caerse mientras corría detrás de su autobús escolar y ser atropellado por las ruedas traseras. Este caso demuestra la habilidad de la firma para obtener compensación en accidentes que involucran autobuses escolares y menores.
Un joven chino con discapacidad de desarrollo de 21 años caminaba con algunos amigos después de la escuela cuando salió al cruce de peatones contra la luz y un autobús de la ciudad que estaba girando demasiado cerca de la esquina lo golpeó.
La Sra. Y-H era una pasajera en un tren del metro que descarriló.
Un ayudante de camarero de 20 años fue atropellado por un automóvil en Ocean Parkway en Brooklyn, sufriendo lesiones graves, incluyendo un coma. Aunque es un caso de peatón, el incidente involucra un vehículo y demuestra la experiencia de la firma en manejar accidentes graves de tránsito.
A pesar del hecho de que este caso fue referido a Dansker & Aspromonte LLP Associates por otro abogado 17 años después de que ocurriera el accidente, se obtuvo un veredicto impresionante a través de una investigación cuidadosa y una preparación incansable.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este caso involucró a una niña de 6 años que estaba en una camioneta que fue golpeada por una ambulancia en un choque de varios autos en el Northern State Parkway en Long Island, Nueva York.
Una oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años sufrió lesiones graves mientras era pasajera en un automóvil policial en camino a una llamada de emergencia.
Un carpintero de 46 años cayó de una escalera que resbaló en el sitio de trabajo, lo que le causó lesiones significativas. Este caso ilustra la experiencia de la firma en accidentes de equipo defectuoso en entornos de construcción.
Un carpintero de 30 años cayó de una escalera en un sitio de trabajo en una tienda minorista, resultando en lesiones graves. Este caso subraya la capacidad de la firma para asegurar compensación en accidentes de caídas en proyectos de construcción.
Un inmigrante mexicano sin documentación cayó 30 pies desde un andamio en un sitio de construcción, sufriendo lesiones graves al impactar contra el cemento. Este caso demuestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas en el lugar de trabajo, comunes en la construcción.
Un trabajador de construcción sufrió fracturas en el hombro, clavícula, costillas y cadera, además de lesiones internas que requirieron múltiples cirugías. Este caso destaca la habilidad de la firma para manejar lesiones graves en el lugar de trabajo.
Baby S was born with a congenital hip dislocation which was not anyone’s fault. However, malpractice occurred when the doctors and hospital did not recognize the condition after she was born. Their failure to diagnose and properly treat the condition resulted in a slight but permanent deformity.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.
A 46-year-old carpenter was working on a straight ladder which had been leaned against the wall on a jobsite. He fell when the ladder slipped away from the wall. As a result, he suffered facial injuries and a fractured knee that required surgery. The property owner and general contractor were found to be responsible because Jian S. should have been provided with a more suitable A-frame ladder or scaffolding.
A 30-year-old carpenter who was working at a job site in a retail store fell from a ladder onto both feet. He suffered bilateral calcaneus fractures requiring multiple surgeries.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Maria, a housekeeper, was walking across Ocean Parkway in Brooklyn in the crosswalk when she was struck by a school bus and thrown over 25 feet. She sustained severe injuries, including multiple fractures. The bus driver claimed that he had a green light and was travelling at a safe speed. Unfortunately, Mrs. S. could not recall any of the facts of the accident. Our investigator combed the area for witnesses. He found a woman who lived on the sixth floor of an adjacent apartment building. Although she didn’t see the accident, she happened to look out her window and saw Maria’s body lying in the roadway down the street. Using this testimony, our accident reconstruction expert was able to prove that the bus had to be speeding to knock Maria that far from the crosswalk. The case was settled immediately after that testimony.
Our client was a married NYC Parks Department employee. On a snowy night in Staten Island, he was preparing his truck to spread salt on the roadways. He drove the spreader truck to the salt storage yard. As he waited alongside his truck, the operator of a front loader truck used to place the salt in the spreader lost control of the loading bucket. Sadly, he was struck by the bucket, suffered massive injuries and died in the hospital several hours later.
A 21-year-old developmentally disabled Chinese boy was walking with some friends after school when he stepped out into the crosswalk against the light and a City bus which was turning a little too close to the corner struck him. The young man had crippling injuries which prevented him from leaving the hospital where he died several months later. Despite the fact that eyewitnesses said the boy stepped into the street against the light, the law reduces an injured person’s share of liability in accordance with their mental capacity. At trial, it was proven through a guidance counselor from his school that he was intellectually comparable to a seven-year-old. Thereafter, the jury determined that this young man was not legally responsible for his actions and awarded 100% in his favor on the liability portion of the trial
In one of the most tragic cases this office has seen, two mothers and their four teenagers were driving to a high school swimming meet on the New York State Thruway in a van. When the driver suspected a flat tire, instead of pulling over onto the shoulder, the mother of two of the children inexplicably stopped the van in the right moving lane of traffic. Within a very short time, the driver of a tanker truck traveling at a steady 65 miles an hour who claimed not to see the stopped van, struck it at full speed, literally cutting the van in half. There were two survivors with grave injuries and four fatalities. We secured the maximum insurance that was available to cover these claims.
Following a 4- story fall, a construction worker at a West 17th Street construction site in Manhattan recently won a $5.5 million dollar settlement from the general contractor and building owner for failing to provide him with a safe workplace. Defendants had argued that the fall was the result of the 56 year old construction worker’s own carelessness but Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP lawyers were able to prove otherwise. As a result of his fall, the construction worker suffered fractures of his shoulder, clavicle, ribs and hip, as well as internal injuries which required multiple surgeries. These injuries required home care which was primarily provided by his wife who also received a payment of $500,000 as part of the settlement. To minimize their own responsibility, the general contractor and building owner claimed that the worker had made an excellent recovery when he had not. In order to prove the case, Dansker & Aspromonte Associates LLP retained 5 separate experts to illustrate the full extent of the worker’s injuries and the disabling effect they would have over the course of his life.
Un trabajador de construcción de 50 años estaba montando su bicicleta cuando cayó debido a un defecto en la carretera y sufrió pequeñas fracturas y daños cognitivos leves.
Un trabajador de mantenimiento de 31 años golpeó un sensor de presión de control de tráfico de la ciudad de Nueva York mientras montaba su bicicleta. Debido a un mal mantenimiento del sensor, el trabajador sufrió lesiones graves.
Una mujer y su novio estaban andando en bicicleta cuando entraron en un sitio de excavación sin protección en una zona completamente oscura bajo un paso elevado. La bicicleta de Rhonda cayó en un pozo y su cara se estrelló contra la carretera.
Un repartidor en bicicleta de 26 años fue golpeado por una camioneta Dollar Rent-A-Car que iba a gran velocidad en una intersección concurrida, causando múltiples fracturas en el cuello, espalda, brazo y pierna, así como daños cerebrales leves.
La madre de Taylor había subido más de 50 libras durante el embarazo, estaba atrasada, y tuvo una prolongada primera y segunda etapa del parto.
Una joven madre china por primera vez resultó herida debido a la negligencia médica de los médicos y el personal de lo que entonces era el Hospital Beekman Downtown.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Christian, un niño de 4 años, fue llevado al hospital para una reparación rutinaria de párpados caídos. El hospital, en una medida de reducción de costos, había contratado sus servicios de anestesia en quirófano a una corporación que empleaba principalmente enfermeras anestesistas en lugar de médicos capacitados para administrar anestesia.
Un guardia de seguridad resbaló en una superficie helada frente a un edificio propiedad de Metropolitan Life, lo que le causó una fractura de rodilla.
Una asistente de salud en el hogar de 56 años tropezó con un cable expuesto que se extendía desde una cabina telefónica en la plataforma del metro, resultando en una lesión que requirió un reemplazo de rodilla.
Un conductor de servicio se bajó de su vehículo para recoger dinero en el carril de un Burger King cuando cayó a través de una rejilla de alcantarillado rota, resultando en una caída de 4 pies y lesiones significativas.
Un trabajador de construcción indocumentado cayó desde un andamio a 30 pies de altura, impactando contra el cemento y sufriendo lesiones graves. Este caso muestra la experiencia de la firma en caídas graves en el trabajo, que se relacionan con incidentes de resbalones y caídas en entornos peligrosos.
Un niño de 16 años fue atropellado por un camión que estaba retrocediendo lentamente y quedó atrapado contra una pared, sufriendo una grave laceración en el bazo, que tuvo que ser removido.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
Adjudicado al cónyuge. El Sr. S. era un empleado casado del Departamento de Parques de Nueva York. En una noche nevada en Staten Island, estaba preparando su camión para esparcir sal en las carreteras
Adjudicado a la familia. Un hombre de 49 años cayó por el hueco de un ascensor cuando las puertas del ascensor se abrieron, pero la cabina del ascensor estaba en un piso superior.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Este accidente ocurrió en el Bronx cuando Rafael C. estaba trabajando en un camión de saneamiento. El conductor perdió el control al girar el vehículo.
Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.Una pasante de teatro de 22 años caminaba por la intersección de la calle 42 y la Novena Avenida en Manhattan cuando fue golpeada por la puerta trasera de un camión que pasaba cuando la puerta abrio volando porque no había sido asegurado correctamente por el conductor.
En uno de los casos más trágicos que ha visto esta oficina, dos madres y sus cuatro adolescentes conducían a una reunión de natación de la escuela secundaria en el New York State Thruway en una camioneta.
Un bombero de 42 años, que antes había corrido más de 30 maratones, se cortó la pierna mientras luchaba contra un incendio.
Un Oficial de la Policía de la Ciudad de Nueva York de 35 años era una pasajera en un automóvil de la policía que iba a una llamada de emergencia.
An undocumented Mexican immigrant working on scaffolding at a construction site fell 30 feet onto the cement. He fractured his skull and vertebrae in his neck and back. It was shown at trial that the company he worked for failed to provide him with a safety line, which would have prevented his fall.
Julio, 16, was an outpatient at the Manhattan Children’s Psychiatric Hospital where he attended school and got psychiatric counseling and supportive therapy every day. The NYC Board of Ed operated the school. One day after school, Julio ran after his bus, which was leaving without him. He slipped and was run over by the back wheels, sustaining severe injuries, including bilateral hip fractures and a shearing injury to his buttocks. Board of Ed rules required that Julio was to be escorted to the bus. The NYCTA denied liability, claiming they weren’t negligent because Julio ran after the bus. The City denied liability because they claimed the school day was over. At trial, both the Board of Ed who had knowledge of Julio’s poor impulse control and was required to put him safely on the bus, and the NYCTA whose bus driver saw Julio running and made no effort to slow or stop the bus were found to be responsible.
Baby Taylor C. – Taylor’s mother had gained over 50 pounds during the pregnancy, was past due, and had a prolonged first stage and second stage of delivery. These are warning signs of an overly large baby. Baby Taylor was 9 lbs. 13 oz. Instead of delivery by C-section, which was clearly indicated, the attending physician elected a natural birth. When the baby was stuck in the pelvic area, excessive force was used to pull her out, injuring the nerves in her neck and causing partial paralysis of her left arm. The condition is known as Erbs Palsy. The case was settled during the trial. Fortunately, Baby Taylor’s injury improved over time.
Ayisha W- A young girl slid down a sliding pond in the playground of an NYC school. The slide was not installed properly and there was a gap between the metal on the side of the slide. As Ayisha slid down, her ring finger went into the gap and the top of it was cut off. The City argued that since it was just the tip of her finger it was not worth much money. At trial, it was proved that Ayisha had a devastating emotional reaction that affected every aspect of her life and self-esteem. The jury agreed.